File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/07408170903113789
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-77649319448
- WOS: WOS:000273919300004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Can flexibility be constraining?
Title | Can flexibility be constraining? |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Cross-training Flexibility Optimization Scheduling Workforce management |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/0740817x.asp |
Citation | IIE Transactions (Institute Of Industrial Engineers), 2010, v. 42 n. 1, p. 45-59 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Five common options for workforce flexibility and their robustness under uncertain demand are investigated. In the first stage, a firm makes optimal staffing decisions according to estimated demand and a given workforce flexibility policy. In the second stage, it reallocates its workforce to react to demand shocks. Numerical results are presented that show that flexibility can lead a firm to staff with too little slack to be flexible to demand shocks, thus leading to higher total costs, i.e., staffing and inventory costs. The forms of flexibility that give robust benefits are identified and an analysis on how different forms of flexibility interact with each other is performed. [Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of IIE Transactions for the following supplemental resource: Appendix with additional tables of results.] © 2010 quot;IIEquot;. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/141776 |
ISSN | 2018 Impact Factor: 2.884 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pinker, E | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, HH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Berman, O | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-09-27T03:00:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-09-27T03:00:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | IIE Transactions (Institute Of Industrial Engineers), 2010, v. 42 n. 1, p. 45-59 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0740-817X | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/141776 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Five common options for workforce flexibility and their robustness under uncertain demand are investigated. In the first stage, a firm makes optimal staffing decisions according to estimated demand and a given workforce flexibility policy. In the second stage, it reallocates its workforce to react to demand shocks. Numerical results are presented that show that flexibility can lead a firm to staff with too little slack to be flexible to demand shocks, thus leading to higher total costs, i.e., staffing and inventory costs. The forms of flexibility that give robust benefits are identified and an analysis on how different forms of flexibility interact with each other is performed. [Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of IIE Transactions for the following supplemental resource: Appendix with additional tables of results.] © 2010 quot;IIEquot;. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/0740817x.asp | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers) | en_HK |
dc.subject | Cross-training | en_HK |
dc.subject | Flexibility | en_HK |
dc.subject | Optimization | en_HK |
dc.subject | Scheduling | en_HK |
dc.subject | Workforce management | en_HK |
dc.title | Can flexibility be constraining? | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Lee, HH: hhlee@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lee, HH=rp01556 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/07408170903113789 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-77649319448 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77649319448&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 42 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 45 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 59 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1545-8830 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000273919300004 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Pinker, E=6603181996 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lee, HH=35757543400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Berman, O=7006475587 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0740-817X | - |