File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Has language learning strategy research come to an end? A response to Tseng et al. (2006)

TitleHas language learning strategy research come to an end? A response to Tseng et al. (2006)
Authors
Issue Date2007
PublisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/
Citation
Applied Linguistics, 2007, v. 28 n. 4, p. 615-620 How to Cite?
AbstractTseng et al. (2006) critically examine language learning strategy (LLS) research and propose to assess language learners' strategic learning in terms of their self-regulatory capacity. In this response, I discuss whether the proposed advance of self-regulation means the marginalization of LLS research. While recognizing the merits of the proposal, I argue that the proposal needs to consider other competing constructs with similar connotations in research on learners' strategic language learning. The response also reports on recent developments in LLS research, contending that such developments could complement the advance of a broad perspective on learners' strategic learning in research. © Oxford University Press 2007.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/141762
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.25
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.749
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGao, Xen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-27T03:00:24Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-27T03:00:24Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_HK
dc.identifier.citationApplied Linguistics, 2007, v. 28 n. 4, p. 615-620en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0142-6001en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/141762-
dc.description.abstractTseng et al. (2006) critically examine language learning strategy (LLS) research and propose to assess language learners' strategic learning in terms of their self-regulatory capacity. In this response, I discuss whether the proposed advance of self-regulation means the marginalization of LLS research. While recognizing the merits of the proposal, I argue that the proposal needs to consider other competing constructs with similar connotations in research on learners' strategic language learning. The response also reports on recent developments in LLS research, contending that such developments could complement the advance of a broad perspective on learners' strategic learning in research. © Oxford University Press 2007.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Linguisticsen_HK
dc.titleHas language learning strategy research come to an end? A response to Tseng et al. (2006)en_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailGao, X: xsgao@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityGao, X=rp01549en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/applin/amm034en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-37049007171en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-37049007171&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume28en_HK
dc.identifier.issue4en_HK
dc.identifier.spage615en_HK
dc.identifier.epage620en_HK
dc.identifier.eissn1477-450X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000251505600009-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridGao, X=23099781400en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats