File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Book: Imperial contagions : medicine, hygiene, and cultures of planning in Asia

TitleImperial contagions : medicine, hygiene, and cultures of planning in Asia
亞洲在殖民地時期的醫療、衛生與規劃文化
Editors
Issue Date2013
PublisherHong Kong University Press
Citation
Peckham, RS & Pomfret, DM (Eds.). Imperial contagions : medicine, hygiene, and cultures of planning in Asia. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. 2013 How to Cite?
AbstractImperial Contagions argues there was no straightforward shift from older enclavist models of colonial medicine to a newer emphasis on the prevention and treatment of disease among indigenous populations and European residents. It shows that colonial medicine was not at all homogeneous “on the ground” but was riven with tensions and contradictions. Indigenous elites contested and appropriated Western medical knowledge and practices for their own purposes. Colonial policies contained contradictory and cross-cutting impulses. This book challenges the belief that colonial regimes were uniformly able to regulate indigenous bodies and that colonial medicine served as a “tool of empire.”
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/141572
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.editorPeckham, RS-
dc.contributor.editorPomfret, DM-
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-23T06:42:35Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-23T06:42:35Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationPeckham, RS & Pomfret, DM (Eds.). Imperial contagions : medicine, hygiene, and cultures of planning in Asia. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. 2013-
dc.identifier.isbn9789888139521-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/141572-
dc.description.abstractImperial Contagions argues there was no straightforward shift from older enclavist models of colonial medicine to a newer emphasis on the prevention and treatment of disease among indigenous populations and European residents. It shows that colonial medicine was not at all homogeneous “on the ground” but was riven with tensions and contradictions. Indigenous elites contested and appropriated Western medical knowledge and practices for their own purposes. Colonial policies contained contradictory and cross-cutting impulses. This book challenges the belief that colonial regimes were uniformly able to regulate indigenous bodies and that colonial medicine served as a “tool of empire.”-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherHong Kong University Pressen_US
dc.titleImperial contagions : medicine, hygiene, and cultures of planning in Asia-
dc.title亞洲在殖民地時期的醫療、衛生與規劃文化-
dc.typeBooken_US
dc.identifier.emailPeckham, RS: rpeckham@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailPomfret, DM: pomfretd@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityPeckham, RS=rp01193en_US
dc.identifier.authorityPomfret, DM=rp01194en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros195372en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros214101-
dc.identifier.hkuros247294-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage307-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats