File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: CFP: Cooperative fast protection

TitleCFP: Cooperative fast protection
Authors
KeywordsCFP (cooperative fast protection)
Optical networks
p-cycle (preconfigured protection cycle)
Survivability
Signaling mechanisms
Issue Date2010
PublisherI E E E. The Journal's web site is located at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=50
Citation
IEEE INFOCOM’09 mini-conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, April 2009. In Journal Of Lightwave Technology, 2010, v. 28 n. 7, p. 1102-1113 How to Cite?
AbstractWe introduce a novel protection scheme, called cooperative fast protection (CFP), to fight against a single link failure in survivable(wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) mesh networks. CFP achieves capacity-efficient fast protection with features of node-autonomy and failure-independency. Though CFP organizes spare capacity into pre-cross-connected cycles, it differs from -cycle by reusing the released working capacity of the disrupted lightpaths (i.e., stubs) in a cooperative manner, and utilizing both the released stubs and the spare capacity on the cycles to set up backup paths. This is achieved by allowing all failure-aware nodes to switch traffic upon a link failure, such that the disrupted lightpaths can be restored even if the end nodes of the failed link are not on the cycles. CFP also differs from FIPP (Failure Independent Path Protecting) -cycle by reducing optical recovery time, and not requiring the cycles to pass through the source nodes of the protected lightpaths. By jointly optimizing both working and spare capacity placement, we formulate an ILP (Integer Linear Program) for CFP design without candidate cycle enumeration. Theoretical analysis and numerical results show that CFP significantly outperforms -cycle based schemes by achieving faster optical recovery speed with much higher capacity efficiency. The performance gain is achieved at the expense of higher computation complexity, but without involving any additional signaling mechanism in the optical domain. Index Terms-CFP (cooperative fast protection), optical networks, -cycle (preconfigured protection cycle), survivability. © 2010 IEEE.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/139272
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.567
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.006
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWu, Ben_HK
dc.contributor.authorHo, PHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYeung, KLen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTapolcai, Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorMouftah, HTen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-23T05:47:48Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-23T05:47:48Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_HK
dc.identifier.citationIEEE INFOCOM’09 mini-conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, April 2009. In Journal Of Lightwave Technology, 2010, v. 28 n. 7, p. 1102-1113en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0733-8724en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/139272-
dc.description.abstractWe introduce a novel protection scheme, called cooperative fast protection (CFP), to fight against a single link failure in survivable(wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) mesh networks. CFP achieves capacity-efficient fast protection with features of node-autonomy and failure-independency. Though CFP organizes spare capacity into pre-cross-connected cycles, it differs from -cycle by reusing the released working capacity of the disrupted lightpaths (i.e., stubs) in a cooperative manner, and utilizing both the released stubs and the spare capacity on the cycles to set up backup paths. This is achieved by allowing all failure-aware nodes to switch traffic upon a link failure, such that the disrupted lightpaths can be restored even if the end nodes of the failed link are not on the cycles. CFP also differs from FIPP (Failure Independent Path Protecting) -cycle by reducing optical recovery time, and not requiring the cycles to pass through the source nodes of the protected lightpaths. By jointly optimizing both working and spare capacity placement, we formulate an ILP (Integer Linear Program) for CFP design without candidate cycle enumeration. Theoretical analysis and numerical results show that CFP significantly outperforms -cycle based schemes by achieving faster optical recovery speed with much higher capacity efficiency. The performance gain is achieved at the expense of higher computation complexity, but without involving any additional signaling mechanism in the optical domain. Index Terms-CFP (cooperative fast protection), optical networks, -cycle (preconfigured protection cycle), survivability. © 2010 IEEE.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherI E E E. The Journal's web site is located at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=50en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Lightwave Technologyen_HK
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.rightsJournal of Lightwave Technology. Copyright © IEEE.-
dc.rights©2010 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.-
dc.subjectCFP (cooperative fast protection)-
dc.subjectOptical networks-
dc.subjectp-cycle (preconfigured protection cycle)-
dc.subjectSurvivability-
dc.subjectSignaling mechanisms-
dc.titleCFP: Cooperative fast protectionen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0733-8724&volume=28&issue=7&spage=1102&epage=1113&date=2010&atitle=CFP:+Cooperative+fast+protection-
dc.identifier.emailYeung, KL:kyeung@eee.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityYeung, KL=rp00204en_HK
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/JLT.2009.2037525en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79955675871en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros195075en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79955675871&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume28en_HK
dc.identifier.issue7en_HK
dc.identifier.spage1102en_HK
dc.identifier.epage1113en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000276674700001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWu, B=35231472500en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHo, PH=7402211578en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYeung, KL=7202424908en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTapolcai, J=6506252092en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMouftah, HT=7102957682en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats