File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function

TitleMaxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function
Authors
Keywordscleft
distraction
orthognathic surgery
speech
velopharyngeal function
Issue Date2010
PublisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijom
Citation
International Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2010, v. 39 n. 7, p. 633-640 How to Cite?
AbstractThis clinical randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the effects of distraction osteogenesis (DO) and conventional orthognathic surgery (CO) on velopharyngeal function and speech outcomes in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients. Twenty-one CLP patients who required maxillary advancement ranging from 4 to 10 mm were recruited and randomly assigned to either CO or DO. Evaluation of resonance and nasal emission, nasoendoscopic velopharyngeal assessment and nasometry were performed preoperatively and at a minimum of two postoperative times: 3-8 months (mean 4 months) and 12-29 months (mean 17 months). Results showed no significant differences in speech and velopharyngeal function changes between the two groups. No correlation was found between the amount of advancement and the outcome measures. It was concluded that DO has no advantage over CO for the purpose of preventing velopharyngeal incompetence and speech disturbance in moderate cleft maxillary advancement. © 2010 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/138587
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.563
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.854
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Hong Kong Research Grant CouncilHKU 7577/05 M
Funding Information:

This clinical study was supported by a Competitive Earmarked Research Grant from the Hong Kong Research Grant Council (Reference code: HKU 7577/05 M).

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChua, HDPen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWhitehill, TLen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSamman, Nen_HK
dc.contributor.authorCheung, LKen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-01T07:18:56Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-01T07:18:56Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_HK
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2010, v. 39 n. 7, p. 633-640en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/138587-
dc.description.abstractThis clinical randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the effects of distraction osteogenesis (DO) and conventional orthognathic surgery (CO) on velopharyngeal function and speech outcomes in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients. Twenty-one CLP patients who required maxillary advancement ranging from 4 to 10 mm were recruited and randomly assigned to either CO or DO. Evaluation of resonance and nasal emission, nasoendoscopic velopharyngeal assessment and nasometry were performed preoperatively and at a minimum of two postoperative times: 3-8 months (mean 4 months) and 12-29 months (mean 17 months). Results showed no significant differences in speech and velopharyngeal function changes between the two groups. No correlation was found between the amount of advancement and the outcome measures. It was concluded that DO has no advantage over CO for the purpose of preventing velopharyngeal incompetence and speech disturbance in moderate cleft maxillary advancement. © 2010 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.en_HK
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijomen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_HK
dc.subjectcleften_HK
dc.subjectdistractionen_HK
dc.subjectorthognathic surgeryen_HK
dc.subjectspeechen_HK
dc.subjectvelopharyngeal functionen_HK
dc.titleMaxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal functionen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0901-5027&volume=39&issue=7&spage=633&epage=640&date=2010&atitle=Maxillary+distraction+versus+orthognathic+surgery+in+cleft+lip+and+palate+patients:+effects+on+speech+and+velopharyngeal+function-
dc.identifier.emailWhitehill, TL: tara@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailSamman, N: nsamman@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailCheung, LK: lkcheung@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityWhitehill, TL=rp00970en_HK
dc.identifier.authoritySamman, N=rp00021en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, LK=rp00013en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.011en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid20413269-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77953611938en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros172151-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77953611938&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume39en_HK
dc.identifier.issue7en_HK
dc.identifier.spage633en_HK
dc.identifier.epage640en_HK
dc.identifier.eissn1399-0020-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000279972500001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChua, HDP=10838799100en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWhitehill, TL=7004098633en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSamman, N=7006413627en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, LK=7102302747en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats