Article: A questionnaire study assessing local physicians, radiologists and interns’ knowledge and practice pertaining to radiation exposure related to radiological imaging

File Download
  • No File Attached
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
Supplementary
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleA questionnaire study assessing local physicians, radiologists and interns’ knowledge and practice pertaining to radiation exposure related to radiological imaging
AuthorsWong, CS3
Huang, B
Sin, HK
Wong, WL
Yiu, KL
Chu, TYC
KeywordsQuestionnaire study
Radiation exposure
Radiological imaging
Issue Date2011
PublisherElsevier Ireland Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrad
CitationEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2011 [Epub ahead of print] [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.022
AbstractPURPOSE: To assess the knowledge and practice pertaining to radiation exposure related to radiological imaging among medical doctors, in relation to specialty and year of experience. METHODOLOGY: Questionnaires as recommended by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) were distributed to doctors in tertiary hospitals by convenience sampling. Their knowledge of radiation doses of common radiological investigations was assessed by any significant difference from correct answers by sampled t-test. Comparison between specialties and between the more (>6 years experience) and less experienced doctors was made by pairwise comparisons of 'right answer minus mean difference (RMD)' using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. Descriptive analysis of their knowledge of harmful effects of radiation and the practices pertaining were also performed. RESULTS: Total 93 questionnaires were sent out and 82 (88.2%, 40 interns, 24 clinicians, 18 radiologists) were returned. Radiologists had the least deviation from correct answers compared to interns (1.29 vs. 2.40, p=0.018) and physicians (1.29 vs. 2.57, p=0.046). More-experienced doctors also performed better than the less-experienced (1.69 vs. 2.57, p=0.027). 12/80 (15%) and 4/80 (5%) failed to recognize MR and US as radiation-free modalities. Only 10/80 (12.5%) knew the risk of carcinogenesis from abdominal CT and only 4/81 (5%) will discuss radiation-related hazard with patients routinely. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of medical doctors, including radiologists, towards radiation exposure of imaging is unsatisfactory and could imply a tendency of radiation misuse and under-utilization of alternative radiation-free methods. On-job training and discussion of the radiation risk with patients are advised.
DescriptionThe European Congress of Radiology (ECR 2011), Vienna, Austria, 3-7 March 2011.
ISSN0720-048X
2011 Impact Factor: 2.606
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.195
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.022
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000300408100017
DC Field
Value
dc.contributor.authorWong, CS
dc.contributor.authorHuang, B
dc.contributor.authorSin, HK
dc.contributor.authorWong, WL
dc.contributor.authorYiu, KL
dc.contributor.authorChu, TYC
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-26T14:32:18Z
dc.date.available2011-08-26T14:32:18Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To assess the knowledge and practice pertaining to radiation exposure related to radiological imaging among medical doctors, in relation to specialty and year of experience. METHODOLOGY: Questionnaires as recommended by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) were distributed to doctors in tertiary hospitals by convenience sampling. Their knowledge of radiation doses of common radiological investigations was assessed by any significant difference from correct answers by sampled t-test. Comparison between specialties and between the more (>6 years experience) and less experienced doctors was made by pairwise comparisons of 'right answer minus mean difference (RMD)' using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. Descriptive analysis of their knowledge of harmful effects of radiation and the practices pertaining were also performed. RESULTS: Total 93 questionnaires were sent out and 82 (88.2%, 40 interns, 24 clinicians, 18 radiologists) were returned. Radiologists had the least deviation from correct answers compared to interns (1.29 vs. 2.40, p=0.018) and physicians (1.29 vs. 2.57, p=0.046). More-experienced doctors also performed better than the less-experienced (1.69 vs. 2.57, p=0.027). 12/80 (15%) and 4/80 (5%) failed to recognize MR and US as radiation-free modalities. Only 10/80 (12.5%) knew the risk of carcinogenesis from abdominal CT and only 4/81 (5%) will discuss radiation-related hazard with patients routinely. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of medical doctors, including radiologists, towards radiation exposure of imaging is unsatisfactory and could imply a tendency of radiation misuse and under-utilization of alternative radiation-free methods. On-job training and discussion of the radiation risk with patients are advised.
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
dc.descriptionThe European Congress of Radiology (ECR 2011), Vienna, Austria, 3-7 March 2011.
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2011 [Epub ahead of print] [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.022
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.022
dc.identifier.hkuros191848
dc.identifier.hkuros191572
dc.identifier.hkuros191573
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000300408100017
dc.identifier.issn0720-048X
2011 Impact Factor: 2.606
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.195
dc.identifier.openurl
dc.identifier.pmid21439746
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84856956891
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/137718
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrad
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Radiology
dc.subjectQuestionnaire study
dc.subjectRadiation exposure
dc.subjectRadiological imaging
dc.titleA questionnaire study assessing local physicians, radiologists and interns’ knowledge and practice pertaining to radiation exposure related to radiological imaging
dc.typeArticle
Author Affiliations
  1. Kwong Wah Hospital
  2. The University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine
  3. The University of Hong Kong