File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.08.005
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33244491007
- PMID: 16503307
- WOS: WOS:000240314800003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Measuring pain presence and intensity in nursing home residents
Title | Measuring pain presence and intensity in nursing home residents |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | MDS Nursing home Pain intensity Pain presence Proxy respondents |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jmda |
Citation | Journal Of The American Medical Directors Association, 2006, v. 7 n. 3, p. 147-153 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective: To examine the extent of agreement between nursing home residents' (or their proxies') reports of pain presence and intensity as derived from an interview questionnaire and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nearest to the interview date. Design: Cross-sectional comparison of the 2 data sources on pain measurements. Setting: Nursing homes included in evaluation projects of EverCare program and Minnesota Senior Health Options. Participants: Nursing home residents (n = 3100) were grouped based on the type of respondent answering the interview questionnaire: Resident, family proxy, or staff proxy. Measurements: We used kappa statistics and multinomial logit regression to examine agreement between the interview questionnaire and the MDS on pain presence and intensity. Results: Presence of pain was reported 1.3 to 1.8 times more often on the questionnaire, depending on the respondent group. Agreement on the presence of pain was slight to fair (kappa = 0.17 to 0.28) between the MDS and the questionnaire. There was slight agreement on pain intensity (kappa = 0.13 to 0.18). The family proxy respondent group showed the largest discrepancy between questionnaire and the MDS in reporting of pain presence and intensity. The staff proxy respondent group had better agreement on pain intensity than did the other respondent groups, but it achieved only slight agreement (kappa = 0.18). Conclusions: Detecting and quantifying pain in nursing home residents is complex. Pain information is best obtained directly from residents; observations should be standardized. The MDS should be revised accordingly. Copyright ©2006 American Medical Directors Association. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/137020 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.592 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lin, WC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lum, TY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Mehr, DR | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Kane, RL | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-07-29T02:14:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-29T02:14:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of The American Medical Directors Association, 2006, v. 7 n. 3, p. 147-153 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1525-8610 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/137020 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To examine the extent of agreement between nursing home residents' (or their proxies') reports of pain presence and intensity as derived from an interview questionnaire and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nearest to the interview date. Design: Cross-sectional comparison of the 2 data sources on pain measurements. Setting: Nursing homes included in evaluation projects of EverCare program and Minnesota Senior Health Options. Participants: Nursing home residents (n = 3100) were grouped based on the type of respondent answering the interview questionnaire: Resident, family proxy, or staff proxy. Measurements: We used kappa statistics and multinomial logit regression to examine agreement between the interview questionnaire and the MDS on pain presence and intensity. Results: Presence of pain was reported 1.3 to 1.8 times more often on the questionnaire, depending on the respondent group. Agreement on the presence of pain was slight to fair (kappa = 0.17 to 0.28) between the MDS and the questionnaire. There was slight agreement on pain intensity (kappa = 0.13 to 0.18). The family proxy respondent group showed the largest discrepancy between questionnaire and the MDS in reporting of pain presence and intensity. The staff proxy respondent group had better agreement on pain intensity than did the other respondent groups, but it achieved only slight agreement (kappa = 0.18). Conclusions: Detecting and quantifying pain in nursing home residents is complex. Pain information is best obtained directly from residents; observations should be standardized. The MDS should be revised accordingly. Copyright ©2006 American Medical Directors Association. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jmda | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association | en_HK |
dc.rights | NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in <Journal title>. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in PUBLICATION, [VOL#, ISSUE#, (DATE)] DOI# | - |
dc.subject | MDS | en_HK |
dc.subject | Nursing home | en_HK |
dc.subject | Pain intensity | en_HK |
dc.subject | Pain presence | en_HK |
dc.subject | Proxy respondents | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Interviews as Topic - standards | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Pain - diagnosis - epidemiology - psychology | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Pain Measurement - methods - psychology - standards | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Questionnaires - standards | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Severity of Illness Index | - |
dc.title | Measuring pain presence and intensity in nursing home residents | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Lum, TY: tlum@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lum, TY=rp01513 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.08.005 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 16503307 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33244491007 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 198935 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33244491007&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 7 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 147 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 153 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000240314800003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lin, WC=8615080600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lum, TY=8615080500 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Mehr, DR=7004895346 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Kane, RL=35334634400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1525-8610 | - |