File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01104.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79955051662
- PMID: 21332450
- WOS: WOS:000290360100010
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A prospective randomized trial to compare immediate and 24-hour delayed catheter removal following total abdominal hysterectomy
Title | A prospective randomized trial to compare immediate and 24-hour delayed catheter removal following total abdominal hysterectomy | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||
Keywords | Catheter hysterectomy pain | ||||
Issue Date | 2011 | ||||
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0412 | ||||
Citation | Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2011, v. 90 n. 5, p. 478-482 How to Cite? | ||||
Abstract | Objective. To assess whether early or immediate removal of a 12F in-dwelling Foley catheter after total abdominal hysterectomy affects the level of subjective pain assessment postoperatively. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. University Hospital. Population. Seventy women underwent total abdominal hysterectomies for various benign gynecological diseases. Methods. Women were randomized to have the urinary catheter removed in the operating room after the surgical procedure or to have it removed on postoperative day 1. Main outcome measures. The primary outcome was patients' pain assessment and the secondary outcomes were rate of re-catheterization and symptomatic urinary tract infection. Results. There was no difference in the pain assessment between the two groups. A significantly higher number of urinary retention episodes requiring re-catheterization were found in the immediate removal group compared with the delayed removal group (20 vs. 0%; p= 0.011). The incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infection did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions. There are pros and cons regarding the policy of one-day in-dwelling catheterization compared to immediate catheter removal. © 2011 The Authors. | ||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/135670 | ||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.384 | ||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: This project was funded by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Hong Kong. | ||||
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chai, J | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Pun, TC | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-07-27T01:39:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-27T01:39:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2011, v. 90 n. 5, p. 478-482 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0001-6349 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/135670 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective. To assess whether early or immediate removal of a 12F in-dwelling Foley catheter after total abdominal hysterectomy affects the level of subjective pain assessment postoperatively. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. University Hospital. Population. Seventy women underwent total abdominal hysterectomies for various benign gynecological diseases. Methods. Women were randomized to have the urinary catheter removed in the operating room after the surgical procedure or to have it removed on postoperative day 1. Main outcome measures. The primary outcome was patients' pain assessment and the secondary outcomes were rate of re-catheterization and symptomatic urinary tract infection. Results. There was no difference in the pain assessment between the two groups. A significantly higher number of urinary retention episodes requiring re-catheterization were found in the immediate removal group compared with the delayed removal group (20 vs. 0%; p= 0.011). The incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infection did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions. There are pros and cons regarding the policy of one-day in-dwelling catheterization compared to immediate catheter removal. © 2011 The Authors. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0412 | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica | en_HK |
dc.rights | Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. Copyright © John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | - |
dc.subject | Catheter | en_HK |
dc.subject | hysterectomy | en_HK |
dc.subject | pain | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Device Removal - methods | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Hysterectomy - adverse effects | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Pain, Postoperative - etiology - psychology | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Urinary Catheterization - adverse effects - methods | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Urinary Tract Infections - epidemiology - etiology | - |
dc.title | A prospective randomized trial to compare immediate and 24-hour delayed catheter removal following total abdominal hysterectomy | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Chai, J:jchai@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Chai, J=rp00241 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01104.x | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21332450 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79955051662 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 185988 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 202228 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79955051662&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 90 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 478 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 482 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000290360100010 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chai, J=35200414100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Pun, TC=7005509306 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0001-6349 | - |