File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.imavis.2011.02.002
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79957788287
- WOS: WOS:000292344800002
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Bookmarks:
- CiteULike: 1
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Automated fabric defect detection-A review
Title | Automated fabric defect detection-A review |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Automation Fabric defect detection Manufacturing Motif-based Quality control Textile |
Issue Date | 2011 |
Publisher | Elsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/imavis |
Citation | Image And Vision Computing, 2011, v. 29 n. 7, p. 442-458 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This paper provides a review of automated fabric defect detection methods developed in recent years. Fabric defect detection, as a popular topic in automation, is a necessary and essential step of quality control in the textile manufacturing industry. In categorizing these methods broadly, a major group is regarded as non-motif-based while a minor group is treated as motif-based. Non-motif-based approaches are conventional, whereas the motif-based approach is novel in utilizing motif as a basic manipulation unit. Compared with previously published review papers on fabric inspection, this paper firstly offers an up-to-date survey of different defect detection methods and describes their characteristics, strengths and weaknesses. Secondly, it employs a wider classification of methods and divides them into seven approaches (statistical, spectral, model-based, learning, structural, hybrid, and motif-based) and performs a comparative study across these methods. Thirdly, it also presents a qualitative analysis accompanied by results, including detection success rate for every method it has reviewed. Lastly, insights, synergy and future research directions are discussed. This paper shall benefit researchers and practitioners alike in image processing and computer vision fields in understanding the characteristics of the different defect detection approaches. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/135101 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.204 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ngan, HYT | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Pang, GKH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Yung, NHC | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-07-27T01:28:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-27T01:28:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Image And Vision Computing, 2011, v. 29 n. 7, p. 442-458 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0262-8856 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/135101 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper provides a review of automated fabric defect detection methods developed in recent years. Fabric defect detection, as a popular topic in automation, is a necessary and essential step of quality control in the textile manufacturing industry. In categorizing these methods broadly, a major group is regarded as non-motif-based while a minor group is treated as motif-based. Non-motif-based approaches are conventional, whereas the motif-based approach is novel in utilizing motif as a basic manipulation unit. Compared with previously published review papers on fabric inspection, this paper firstly offers an up-to-date survey of different defect detection methods and describes their characteristics, strengths and weaknesses. Secondly, it employs a wider classification of methods and divides them into seven approaches (statistical, spectral, model-based, learning, structural, hybrid, and motif-based) and performs a comparative study across these methods. Thirdly, it also presents a qualitative analysis accompanied by results, including detection success rate for every method it has reviewed. Lastly, insights, synergy and future research directions are discussed. This paper shall benefit researchers and practitioners alike in image processing and computer vision fields in understanding the characteristics of the different defect detection approaches. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/imavis | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Image and Vision Computing | en_HK |
dc.subject | Automation | en_HK |
dc.subject | Fabric defect detection | en_HK |
dc.subject | Manufacturing | en_HK |
dc.subject | Motif-based | en_HK |
dc.subject | Quality control | en_HK |
dc.subject | Textile | en_HK |
dc.title | Automated fabric defect detection-A review | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0262-8856&volume=29&issue=7&spage=442&epage=458&date=2011&atitle=Automated+fabric+defect+detection:+a+review | - |
dc.identifier.email | Pang, GKH:gpang@eee.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Yung, NHC:nyung@eee.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Pang, GKH=rp00162 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Yung, NHC=rp00226 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.imavis.2011.02.002 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79957788287 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 186794 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79957788287&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 442 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 458 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000292344800002 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Netherlands | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ngan, HYT=7102173824 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Pang, GKH=7103393283 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yung, NHC=7003473369 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 9174267 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0262-8856 | - |