File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/fampra/cmq064
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79251497685
- PMID: 20696753
- WOS: WOS:000286467200008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Introducing family medicine in a pluralistic health care system: How patients and doctors see it
Title | Introducing family medicine in a pluralistic health care system: How patients and doctors see it | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||||
Keywords | Family practice Focus group Health care system Health policy Public opinion | ||||||
Issue Date | 2011 | ||||||
Publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/ | ||||||
Citation | Family Practice, 2011, v. 28 n. 1, p. 49-55 How to Cite? | ||||||
Abstract | Background: The health care systems in many countries are focused on specialist care. In those countries that have recently changed to a primary care-based system, some doctors and patients were dissatisfied with the change. Objective: To explore the opinions of the general public and the doctors on the change to a family medicine (FM)-based health care system. Methods: Qualitative study with focus groups of doctors working in different practice settings. Quantitative study with questionnaires sent to all doctors registered in Hong Kong and a telephone survey targeting the general public aged >18. Results: Doctors in the focus groups generally supported a FM-based health care system. They were concerned that there were not enough family doctors for such a system and the patients' current free choice of any doctor for primary care would impede its success. Thousand six hundred and forty-seven adults took part in the telephone survey (response rate 67.6%) and 2310 doctors (22.8%) responded to the questionnaire. Nearly 95% of the general public respondents agreed to the FM system though only 66.3% of them had ever heard of the term family doctor. About 65% of the doctors supported this system but only 33% agreed that the system would work. The specialist-doctors were less supportive of mandatory referral than the non-specialists, while the public was equally divided on this issue. Conclusions: The public accepts the FM-based system but needs education on the benefits of primary health care. Direct access to the specialist would be the greatest barrier. Government involvements are essential for the reform. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. | ||||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/134431 | ||||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.917 | ||||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: Central Policy Unit of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. HKU 7002-PPR-3). | ||||||
References | |||||||
Grants |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wun, YT | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, TP | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, KF | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Goldberg, D | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Li, DKT | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Yip, KC | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-17T09:20:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-06-17T09:20:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Family Practice, 2011, v. 28 n. 1, p. 49-55 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0263-2136 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/134431 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The health care systems in many countries are focused on specialist care. In those countries that have recently changed to a primary care-based system, some doctors and patients were dissatisfied with the change. Objective: To explore the opinions of the general public and the doctors on the change to a family medicine (FM)-based health care system. Methods: Qualitative study with focus groups of doctors working in different practice settings. Quantitative study with questionnaires sent to all doctors registered in Hong Kong and a telephone survey targeting the general public aged >18. Results: Doctors in the focus groups generally supported a FM-based health care system. They were concerned that there were not enough family doctors for such a system and the patients' current free choice of any doctor for primary care would impede its success. Thousand six hundred and forty-seven adults took part in the telephone survey (response rate 67.6%) and 2310 doctors (22.8%) responded to the questionnaire. Nearly 95% of the general public respondents agreed to the FM system though only 66.3% of them had ever heard of the term family doctor. About 65% of the doctors supported this system but only 33% agreed that the system would work. The specialist-doctors were less supportive of mandatory referral than the non-specialists, while the public was equally divided on this issue. Conclusions: The public accepts the FM-based system but needs education on the benefits of primary health care. Direct access to the specialist would be the greatest barrier. Government involvements are essential for the reform. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/ | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Family Practice | en_HK |
dc.subject | Family practice | en_HK |
dc.subject | Focus group | en_HK |
dc.subject | Health care system | en_HK |
dc.subject | Health policy | en_HK |
dc.subject | Public opinion | en_HK |
dc.title | Introducing family medicine in a pluralistic health care system: How patients and doctors see it | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0263-2136&volume=28&issue=1&spage=49&epage=55&date=2011&atitle=Introducing+family+medicine+in+a+pluralistic+health+care+system:+how+patients+and+doctors+see+it | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lam, TP: tplam@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Lam, KF: hrntlkf@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lam, TP=rp00386 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lam, KF=rp00718 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/fampra/cmq064 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20696753 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79251497685 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 185865 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79251497685&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 49 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 55 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1460-2229 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000286467200008 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.relation.project | Is there a need to promote family medicine concept in Hong Kong? - Meeting the need for recognition and treatment of depression as a model | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wun, YT=6701795798 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, TP=55232643600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, KF=8948421200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Goldberg, D=7401442597 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Li, DKT=41561721000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yip, KC=28168097100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 8739567 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0263-2136 | - |