File Download
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: What do Hong Kong's family physicians think of clinical guidelines? - A questionnaire survey
Title | What do Hong Kong's family physicians think of clinical guidelines? - A questionnaire survey |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Attitudes Clinical guidelines Family physicians Hong Kong Survey |
Issue Date | 2011 |
Publisher | Hong Kong College of Family Physicians. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hkcfp.org.hk/ |
Citation | Hong Kong Practitioner, 2011, v. 33 n. 1, p. 4-11 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective: To study the current use of and attitude towards clinical guidelines (CGs) among Hong Kong's family physicians, and to explore the attributes that may enhance implementation. Design: Postal questionnaire survey. Subjects: A questionnaire was posted to all 1427 members of the Hong Kong College of Family Physicians (HKCFP) in the period from March to July, 2010. Main outcome measures: Response to a questionnaire on the current usage of and attitude towards CGs, respondents' demographic data. Results: 617 completed questionnaires were received (response rate 43.2%). Ninety-one percent of respondents had used CGs in patient care and 85% had used them within a month. Sixty-three percent of respondents gave the internet as the first answer to the question of where they found the clinical guidelines. "Contradicting recommendations" was ranked highest as a barrier to guideline use (82%), followed by "CGs not tailored for individual patient's needs" (77%), and "mistrust guidelines sponsored by pharmaceutical companies" (75%). There was a very high degree of agreement on what constituted a good CG: evidence-based (99%), simple and easy to use (99%), applicable to the local population (99%) and the primary care setting (98%), regularly updated (98%) and with cost effective recommendations (93%). On strategies thought to be useful in promoting the use of CGs, 96% of respondents agreed on effective dissemination, 93% on a central system for adoption of CGs, 90% on involving primary care doctors in drafting CGs and 71% on providing financial incentives. Conclusion: Most respondents were using and supportive of CGs, and would like to have a central system for guideline adoption and effective dissemination. They wished to be more involved in the development process. They thought a good CG should be evidence-based, simple and easy to use and applicable in the local setting. Family physicians' views about CGs are important and relevant for Hong Kong's guideline development policy. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/134429 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.119 |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, AKL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Baker, R | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, TP | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Kwong, MBL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, LWY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Hong, T | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-17T09:20:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-06-17T09:20:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Hong Kong Practitioner, 2011, v. 33 n. 1, p. 4-11 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1027-3948 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/134429 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To study the current use of and attitude towards clinical guidelines (CGs) among Hong Kong's family physicians, and to explore the attributes that may enhance implementation. Design: Postal questionnaire survey. Subjects: A questionnaire was posted to all 1427 members of the Hong Kong College of Family Physicians (HKCFP) in the period from March to July, 2010. Main outcome measures: Response to a questionnaire on the current usage of and attitude towards CGs, respondents' demographic data. Results: 617 completed questionnaires were received (response rate 43.2%). Ninety-one percent of respondents had used CGs in patient care and 85% had used them within a month. Sixty-three percent of respondents gave the internet as the first answer to the question of where they found the clinical guidelines. "Contradicting recommendations" was ranked highest as a barrier to guideline use (82%), followed by "CGs not tailored for individual patient's needs" (77%), and "mistrust guidelines sponsored by pharmaceutical companies" (75%). There was a very high degree of agreement on what constituted a good CG: evidence-based (99%), simple and easy to use (99%), applicable to the local population (99%) and the primary care setting (98%), regularly updated (98%) and with cost effective recommendations (93%). On strategies thought to be useful in promoting the use of CGs, 96% of respondents agreed on effective dissemination, 93% on a central system for adoption of CGs, 90% on involving primary care doctors in drafting CGs and 71% on providing financial incentives. Conclusion: Most respondents were using and supportive of CGs, and would like to have a central system for guideline adoption and effective dissemination. They wished to be more involved in the development process. They thought a good CG should be evidence-based, simple and easy to use and applicable in the local setting. Family physicians' views about CGs are important and relevant for Hong Kong's guideline development policy. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Hong Kong College of Family Physicians. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hkcfp.org.hk/ | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Hong Kong Practitioner | en_HK |
dc.subject | Attitudes | en_HK |
dc.subject | Clinical guidelines | en_HK |
dc.subject | Family physicians | en_HK |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | en_HK |
dc.subject | Survey | en_HK |
dc.title | What do Hong Kong's family physicians think of clinical guidelines? - A questionnaire survey | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1027-3948&volume=33&issue=1&spage=4&epage=12&date=2011&atitle=What+do+Hong+Kong%27s+family+physicians+think+of+clinical+guidelines?+-+A+questionnaire+survey | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lam, TP:tplam@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lam, TP=rp00386 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79956023373 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 185863 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79956023373&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 33 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 4 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 11 | en_HK |
dc.publisher.place | Hong Kong | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, AKL=8367105100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Baker, R=7404219596 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, TP=55232643600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Kwong, MBL=35976194700 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, LWY=35975638000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hong, T=35976226100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1027-3948 | - |