Article: Influence of various implant platform configurations on peri-implant tissue dimensions: An experimental study in dog
File Download
(May Require Subscription)
- No File Attached
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02146.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79952527343
- PMID: 21561485
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
-
Appears in Collections:
| Title | Influence of various implant platform configurations on peri-implant tissue dimensions: An experimental study in dog | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Baffone, GM1 Botticelli, D1 3 Pantani, F1 Cardoso, LC2 Schweikert, MT5 Lang, NP4 | ||||||
| Keywords | Animal study Bone healing Bone levels Histometry Oral implants Platform design Soft tissue dimensions | ||||||
| Issue Date | 2011 | ||||||
| Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | ||||||
| Citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 4, p. 438-444 [How to Cite?] DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02146.x | ||||||
| Abstract | Aim: To evaluate the influence (i) of various implant platform configurations and (ii) of implant surface characteristics on peri-implant tissue dimensions in a dog model. Material and methods: Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six Labrador dogs. After 3 months of healing, two implants, one with a turned and a second with a moderately rough surface, were installed on each side of the mandible in the premolar region. On the right side of the mandible, implants with a tapered and enlarged platform were used, while standard cylindrical implants were installed in the left side of the mandible. Abutments with the diameter of the cylindrical implants were used resulting in a mismatch of 0.25mm at the tapered implant sites. The flaps were sutured to allow a non-submerged healing. After 4 months, the animals were sacrificed and ground sections were obtained for histometric assessment. Results: All implants were completely osseointegrated. A minimal buccal bone resorption was observed for both implant configurations and surface topographies. Considering the animals as the statistical unit, no significant differences were found at the buccal aspect in relation to bone levels and soft tissue dimensions. The surface topographies did not influence the outcomes either. Conclusions: The present study failed to show differences in peri-implant tissue dimensions when a mismatch of 0.25mm from a tapered platform to an abutment was applied. The surface topographies influence a neither marginal bone resorption or peri-implant soft tissue dimension. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | ||||||
| ISSN | 0905-7161 2011 Impact Factor: 2.514 2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.117 | ||||||
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02146.x | ||||||
| ISI Accession Number ID | WOS:000288214300012
Funding Information: This study has been supported by a grant from Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italia and by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia. The competent contributions of Professor Luiz Antonio Salata and Mr. Sebastiao Bianco (USP - Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histological processing are highly appreciated. The authors declare no conflict of interest. | ||||||
| References | References in Scopus |
| dc.contributor.author | Baffone, GM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Botticelli, D | ||||||
| dc.contributor.author | Pantani, F | ||||||
| dc.contributor.author | Cardoso, LC | ||||||
| dc.contributor.author | Schweikert, MT | ||||||
| dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | ||||||
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-17T09:18:04Z | ||||||
| dc.date.available | 2011-06-17T09:18:04Z | ||||||
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | ||||||
| dc.description.abstract | Aim: To evaluate the influence (i) of various implant platform configurations and (ii) of implant surface characteristics on peri-implant tissue dimensions in a dog model. Material and methods: Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six Labrador dogs. After 3 months of healing, two implants, one with a turned and a second with a moderately rough surface, were installed on each side of the mandible in the premolar region. On the right side of the mandible, implants with a tapered and enlarged platform were used, while standard cylindrical implants were installed in the left side of the mandible. Abutments with the diameter of the cylindrical implants were used resulting in a mismatch of 0.25mm at the tapered implant sites. The flaps were sutured to allow a non-submerged healing. After 4 months, the animals were sacrificed and ground sections were obtained for histometric assessment. Results: All implants were completely osseointegrated. A minimal buccal bone resorption was observed for both implant configurations and surface topographies. Considering the animals as the statistical unit, no significant differences were found at the buccal aspect in relation to bone levels and soft tissue dimensions. The surface topographies did not influence the outcomes either. Conclusions: The present study failed to show differences in peri-implant tissue dimensions when a mismatch of 0.25mm from a tapered platform to an abutment was applied. The surface topographies influence a neither marginal bone resorption or peri-implant soft tissue dimension. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | ||||||
| dc.description.nature | Link_to_subscribed_fulltext | ||||||
| dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 4, p. 438-444 [How to Cite?] DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02146.x | ||||||
| dc.identifier.citeulike | 8993403 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02146.x | ||||||
| dc.identifier.epage | 444 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.hkuros | 185688 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000288214300012
Funding Information: This study has been supported by a grant from Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italia and by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia. The competent contributions of Professor Luiz Antonio Salata and Mr. Sebastiao Bianco (USP - Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histological processing are highly appreciated. The authors declare no conflict of interest. | ||||||
| dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 2011 Impact Factor: 2.514 2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.117 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.openurl | | ||||||
| dc.identifier.pmid | 21561485 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79952527343 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.spage | 438 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/134341 | ||||||
| dc.identifier.volume | 22 | ||||||
| dc.language | eng | ||||||
| dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | ||||||
| dc.publisher.place | United States | ||||||
| dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Implants Research | ||||||
| dc.relation.references | References in Scopus | ||||||
| dc.rights | The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com | ||||||
| dc.subject | Animal study | ||||||
| dc.subject | Bone healing | ||||||
| dc.subject | Bone levels | ||||||
| dc.subject | Histometry | ||||||
| dc.subject | Oral implants | ||||||
| dc.subject | Platform design | ||||||
| dc.subject | Soft tissue dimensions | ||||||
| dc.title | Influence of various implant platform configurations on peri-implant tissue dimensions: An experimental study in dog | ||||||
| dc.type | Article |
Author Affiliations
- UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
- Goiás Dentistry Improvement School
- ARDEC
- Prince Philip Dental Hospital
- University of Medical Science