File Download
 
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
 
Supplementary

Article: Influence of various implant platform configurations on peri-implant tissue dimensions: An experimental study in dog
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleInfluence of various implant platform configurations on peri-implant tissue dimensions: An experimental study in dog
 
AuthorsBaffone, GM1
Botticelli, D1 3
Pantani, F1
Cardoso, LC2
Schweikert, MT5
Lang, NP4
 
KeywordsAnimal study
Bone healing
Bone levels
Histometry
Oral implants
Platform design
Soft tissue dimensions
 
Issue Date2011
 
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
 
CitationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 4, p. 438-444 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02146.x
 
AbstractAim: To evaluate the influence (i) of various implant platform configurations and (ii) of implant surface characteristics on peri-implant tissue dimensions in a dog model. Material and methods: Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six Labrador dogs. After 3 months of healing, two implants, one with a turned and a second with a moderately rough surface, were installed on each side of the mandible in the premolar region. On the right side of the mandible, implants with a tapered and enlarged platform were used, while standard cylindrical implants were installed in the left side of the mandible. Abutments with the diameter of the cylindrical implants were used resulting in a mismatch of 0.25mm at the tapered implant sites. The flaps were sutured to allow a non-submerged healing. After 4 months, the animals were sacrificed and ground sections were obtained for histometric assessment. Results: All implants were completely osseointegrated. A minimal buccal bone resorption was observed for both implant configurations and surface topographies. Considering the animals as the statistical unit, no significant differences were found at the buccal aspect in relation to bone levels and soft tissue dimensions. The surface topographies did not influence the outcomes either. Conclusions: The present study failed to show differences in peri-implant tissue dimensions when a mismatch of 0.25mm from a tapered platform to an abutment was applied. The surface topographies influence a neither marginal bone resorption or peri-implant soft tissue dimension. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
 
ISSN0905-7161
2012 Impact Factor: 3.433
2012 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.154
 
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02146.x
 
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000288214300012
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italia
ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by a grant from Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italia and by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia. The competent contributions of Professor Luiz Antonio Salata and Mr. Sebastiao Bianco (USP - Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histological processing are highly appreciated. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 
ReferencesReferences in Scopus
 
DC FieldValue
dc.contributor.authorBaffone, GM
 
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, D
 
dc.contributor.authorPantani, F
 
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, LC
 
dc.contributor.authorSchweikert, MT
 
dc.contributor.authorLang, NP
 
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-17T09:18:04Z
 
dc.date.available2011-06-17T09:18:04Z
 
dc.date.issued2011
 
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the influence (i) of various implant platform configurations and (ii) of implant surface characteristics on peri-implant tissue dimensions in a dog model. Material and methods: Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six Labrador dogs. After 3 months of healing, two implants, one with a turned and a second with a moderately rough surface, were installed on each side of the mandible in the premolar region. On the right side of the mandible, implants with a tapered and enlarged platform were used, while standard cylindrical implants were installed in the left side of the mandible. Abutments with the diameter of the cylindrical implants were used resulting in a mismatch of 0.25mm at the tapered implant sites. The flaps were sutured to allow a non-submerged healing. After 4 months, the animals were sacrificed and ground sections were obtained for histometric assessment. Results: All implants were completely osseointegrated. A minimal buccal bone resorption was observed for both implant configurations and surface topographies. Considering the animals as the statistical unit, no significant differences were found at the buccal aspect in relation to bone levels and soft tissue dimensions. The surface topographies did not influence the outcomes either. Conclusions: The present study failed to show differences in peri-implant tissue dimensions when a mismatch of 0.25mm from a tapered platform to an abutment was applied. The surface topographies influence a neither marginal bone resorption or peri-implant soft tissue dimension. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
 
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
 
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 4, p. 438-444 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02146.x
 
dc.identifier.citeulike8993403
 
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02146.x
 
dc.identifier.epage444
 
dc.identifier.hkuros185688
 
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000288214300012
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italia
ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by a grant from Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italia and by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia. The competent contributions of Professor Luiz Antonio Salata and Mr. Sebastiao Bianco (USP - Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histological processing are highly appreciated. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
2012 Impact Factor: 3.433
2012 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.154
 
dc.identifier.issue4
 
dc.identifier.openurl
 
dc.identifier.pmid21561485
 
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79952527343
 
dc.identifier.spage438
 
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/134341
 
dc.identifier.volume22
 
dc.languageeng
 
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
 
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
 
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research
 
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
 
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com
 
dc.subjectAnimal study
 
dc.subjectBone healing
 
dc.subjectBone levels
 
dc.subjectHistometry
 
dc.subjectOral implants
 
dc.subjectPlatform design
 
dc.subjectSoft tissue dimensions
 
dc.titleInfluence of various implant platform configurations on peri-implant tissue dimensions: An experimental study in dog
 
dc.typeArticle
 
<?xml encoding="utf-8" version="1.0"?>
<item><contributor.author>Baffone, GM</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Botticelli, D</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Pantani, F</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Cardoso, LC</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Schweikert, MT</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Lang, NP</contributor.author>
<date.accessioned>2011-06-17T09:18:04Z</date.accessioned>
<date.available>2011-06-17T09:18:04Z</date.available>
<date.issued>2011</date.issued>
<identifier.citation>Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 4, p. 438-444</identifier.citation>
<identifier.issn>0905-7161</identifier.issn>
<identifier.uri>http://hdl.handle.net/10722/134341</identifier.uri>
<description.abstract>Aim: To evaluate the influence (i) of various implant platform configurations and (ii) of implant surface characteristics on peri-implant tissue dimensions in a dog model. Material and methods: Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six Labrador dogs. After 3 months of healing, two implants, one with a turned and a second with a moderately rough surface, were installed on each side of the mandible in the premolar region. On the right side of the mandible, implants with a tapered and enlarged platform were used, while standard cylindrical implants were installed in the left side of the mandible. Abutments with the diameter of the cylindrical implants were used resulting in a mismatch of 0.25mm at the tapered implant sites. The flaps were sutured to allow a non-submerged healing. After 4 months, the animals were sacrificed and ground sections were obtained for histometric assessment. Results: All implants were completely osseointegrated. A minimal buccal bone resorption was observed for both implant configurations and surface topographies. Considering the animals as the statistical unit, no significant differences were found at the buccal aspect in relation to bone levels and soft tissue dimensions. The surface topographies did not influence the outcomes either. Conclusions: The present study failed to show differences in peri-implant tissue dimensions when a mismatch of 0.25mm from a tapered platform to an abutment was applied. The surface topographies influence a neither marginal bone resorption or peri-implant soft tissue dimension. &#169; 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S.</description.abstract>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal&apos;s web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR</publisher>
<relation.ispartof>Clinical Oral Implants Research</relation.ispartof>
<rights>The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com</rights>
<subject>Animal study</subject>
<subject>Bone healing</subject>
<subject>Bone levels</subject>
<subject>Histometry</subject>
<subject>Oral implants</subject>
<subject>Platform design</subject>
<subject>Soft tissue dimensions</subject>
<title>Influence of various implant platform configurations on peri-implant tissue dimensions: An experimental study in dog</title>
<type>Article</type>
<identifier.openurl>http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&amp;issn=0905-7161&amp;volume=22&amp;issue=4&amp;spage=438&amp;epage=444&amp;date=2004&amp;atitle=Influence+of+various+implant+platform+configurations+on+peri-implant+tissue+dimensions:+an+experimental+study+in+dog</identifier.openurl>
<description.nature>Link_to_subscribed_fulltext</description.nature>
<identifier.doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02146.x</identifier.doi>
<identifier.pmid>21561485</identifier.pmid>
<identifier.scopus>eid_2-s2.0-79952527343</identifier.scopus>
<identifier.hkuros>185688</identifier.hkuros>
<relation.references>http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79952527343&amp;selection=ref&amp;src=s&amp;origin=recordpage</relation.references>
<identifier.volume>22</identifier.volume>
<identifier.issue>4</identifier.issue>
<identifier.spage>438</identifier.spage>
<identifier.epage>444</identifier.epage>
<identifier.isi>WOS:000288214300012</identifier.isi>
<publisher.place>United States</publisher.place>
<identifier.citeulike>8993403</identifier.citeulike>
</item>
Author Affiliations
  1. UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
  2. Goiás Dentistry Improvement School
  3. ARDEC
  4. Prince Philip Dental Hospital
  5. University of Medical Science