File Download
 
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
 
Supplementary

Article: Bone regeneration at implants placed into extraction sockets of maxillary incisors in dogs
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleBone regeneration at implants placed into extraction sockets of maxillary incisors in dogs
 
AuthorsSantis, ED1
Botticelli, D2
Pantani, F1
Pereira, FP1
Beolchini, M4
Lang, NP3
 
KeywordsAnimal study
Bone healing
Bone regeneration
Dehiscence defect
Deproteinized bovine bone mineral
Extraction socket
Maxillary incisors
Oral implants
Osseointegration
 
Issue Date2011
 
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
 
CitationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 4, p. 430-437 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.x
 
AbstractAim: To compare the influence of autologous or deproteinized bovine bone mineral as grafting material on healing of buccal dehiscence defects at implants installed immediately into the maxillary second incisor extraction socket in dogs. Material and methods: In the maxillary second incisor sockets of 12 Labrador dogs, implants were installed immediately following tooth extraction. A standardized buccal defect was created and autologous bone particles or deproteinized bovine bone mineral were used to fill the defects. A collagen membrane was placed to cover the graft material, and the flaps were sutured to fully submerge the experimental areas. Six animals were sacrificed after 2 months, and six after 4 months of healing. Ground sections were obtained for histological evaluation. Results: After 2 months of healing, all implants were osseointegrated. All buccal dehiscence defects were completely filled after 2 months irrespective of the augmentation material (autologous bone or Bio-Oss ®) applied. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) on the denuded implant surfaces was within a normal range of 30-40%. However, the newly formed tissue at 2 months was partially resorbed (>50% of the area measurements) after 4 months. Conclusions: Applying either autologous bone or deproteinized bovine bone mineral to dehiscences at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets resulted in high degree of regeneration of the defects with satisfactory BIC on the denuded implant surface. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
 
ISSN0905-7161
2012 Impact Factor: 3.433
2012 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.154
 
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.x
 
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000288214300011
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden Martina SRL
ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by a grant from Sweden & Martina SRL and by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia. The competent contributions of Professor Luiz Antonio Salata e Mr. Sebastiao Bianco (USP - Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histological processing are highly appreciated. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

 
ReferencesReferences in Scopus
 
DC FieldValue
dc.contributor.authorSantis, ED
 
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, D
 
dc.contributor.authorPantani, F
 
dc.contributor.authorPereira, FP
 
dc.contributor.authorBeolchini, M
 
dc.contributor.authorLang, NP
 
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-17T09:18:04Z
 
dc.date.available2011-06-17T09:18:04Z
 
dc.date.issued2011
 
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare the influence of autologous or deproteinized bovine bone mineral as grafting material on healing of buccal dehiscence defects at implants installed immediately into the maxillary second incisor extraction socket in dogs. Material and methods: In the maxillary second incisor sockets of 12 Labrador dogs, implants were installed immediately following tooth extraction. A standardized buccal defect was created and autologous bone particles or deproteinized bovine bone mineral were used to fill the defects. A collagen membrane was placed to cover the graft material, and the flaps were sutured to fully submerge the experimental areas. Six animals were sacrificed after 2 months, and six after 4 months of healing. Ground sections were obtained for histological evaluation. Results: After 2 months of healing, all implants were osseointegrated. All buccal dehiscence defects were completely filled after 2 months irrespective of the augmentation material (autologous bone or Bio-Oss ®) applied. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) on the denuded implant surfaces was within a normal range of 30-40%. However, the newly formed tissue at 2 months was partially resorbed (>50% of the area measurements) after 4 months. Conclusions: Applying either autologous bone or deproteinized bovine bone mineral to dehiscences at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets resulted in high degree of regeneration of the defects with satisfactory BIC on the denuded implant surface. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
 
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
 
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 4, p. 430-437 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.x
 
dc.identifier.citeulike8993404
 
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.x
 
dc.identifier.epage437
 
dc.identifier.hkuros185686
 
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000288214300011
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden Martina SRL
ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by a grant from Sweden & Martina SRL and by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia. The competent contributions of Professor Luiz Antonio Salata e Mr. Sebastiao Bianco (USP - Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histological processing are highly appreciated. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

 
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
2012 Impact Factor: 3.433
2012 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.154
 
dc.identifier.issue4
 
dc.identifier.openurl
 
dc.identifier.pmid21561484
 
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79952520030
 
dc.identifier.spage430
 
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/134340
 
dc.identifier.volume22
 
dc.languageeng
 
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
 
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
 
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research
 
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
 
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com
 
dc.subjectAnimal study
 
dc.subjectBone healing
 
dc.subjectBone regeneration
 
dc.subjectDehiscence defect
 
dc.subjectDeproteinized bovine bone mineral
 
dc.subjectExtraction socket
 
dc.subjectMaxillary incisors
 
dc.subjectOral implants
 
dc.subjectOsseointegration
 
dc.titleBone regeneration at implants placed into extraction sockets of maxillary incisors in dogs
 
dc.typeArticle
 
<?xml encoding="utf-8" version="1.0"?>
<item><contributor.author>Santis, ED</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Botticelli, D</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Pantani, F</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Pereira, FP</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Beolchini, M</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Lang, NP</contributor.author>
<date.accessioned>2011-06-17T09:18:04Z</date.accessioned>
<date.available>2011-06-17T09:18:04Z</date.available>
<date.issued>2011</date.issued>
<identifier.citation>Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 4, p. 430-437</identifier.citation>
<identifier.issn>0905-7161</identifier.issn>
<identifier.uri>http://hdl.handle.net/10722/134340</identifier.uri>
<description.abstract>Aim: To compare the influence of autologous or deproteinized bovine bone mineral as grafting material on healing of buccal dehiscence defects at implants installed immediately into the maxillary second incisor extraction socket in dogs. Material and methods: In the maxillary second incisor sockets of 12 Labrador dogs, implants were installed immediately following tooth extraction. A standardized buccal defect was created and autologous bone particles or deproteinized bovine bone mineral were used to fill the defects. A collagen membrane was placed to cover the graft material, and the flaps were sutured to fully submerge the experimental areas. Six animals were sacrificed after 2 months, and six after 4 months of healing. Ground sections were obtained for histological evaluation. Results: After 2 months of healing, all implants were osseointegrated. All buccal dehiscence defects were completely filled after 2 months irrespective of the augmentation material (autologous bone or Bio-Oss &#174;) applied. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) on the denuded implant surfaces was within a normal range of 30-40%. However, the newly formed tissue at 2 months was partially resorbed (&gt;50% of the area measurements) after 4 months. Conclusions: Applying either autologous bone or deproteinized bovine bone mineral to dehiscences at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets resulted in high degree of regeneration of the defects with satisfactory BIC on the denuded implant surface. &#169; 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S.</description.abstract>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal&apos;s web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR</publisher>
<relation.ispartof>Clinical Oral Implants Research</relation.ispartof>
<rights>The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com</rights>
<subject>Animal study</subject>
<subject>Bone healing</subject>
<subject>Bone regeneration</subject>
<subject>Dehiscence defect</subject>
<subject>Deproteinized bovine bone mineral</subject>
<subject>Extraction socket</subject>
<subject>Maxillary incisors</subject>
<subject>Oral implants</subject>
<subject>Osseointegration</subject>
<title>Bone regeneration at implants placed into extraction sockets of maxillary incisors in dogs</title>
<type>Article</type>
<identifier.openurl>http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&amp;issn=0905-7161&amp;volume=22&amp;issue=4&amp;spage=430&amp;epage=437&amp;date=2011&amp;atitle=Bone+regeneration+at+implants+placed+into+extraction+sockets+of+maxillary+incisors+in+dogs</identifier.openurl>
<description.nature>Link_to_subscribed_fulltext</description.nature>
<identifier.doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.x</identifier.doi>
<identifier.pmid>21561484</identifier.pmid>
<identifier.scopus>eid_2-s2.0-79952520030</identifier.scopus>
<identifier.hkuros>185686</identifier.hkuros>
<relation.references>http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79952520030&amp;selection=ref&amp;src=s&amp;origin=recordpage</relation.references>
<identifier.volume>22</identifier.volume>
<identifier.issue>4</identifier.issue>
<identifier.spage>430</identifier.spage>
<identifier.epage>437</identifier.epage>
<identifier.isi>WOS:000288214300011</identifier.isi>
<publisher.place>United States</publisher.place>
<identifier.citeulike>8993404</identifier.citeulike>
</item>
Author Affiliations
  1. UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
  2. ARDEC
  3. Prince Philip Dental Hospital
  4. University of Medical Science