Article: Bone regeneration at implants placed into extraction sockets of maxillary incisors in dogs

File Download Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleBone regeneration at implants placed into extraction sockets of maxillary incisors in dogs
AuthorsSantis, ED1
Botticelli, D2
Pantani, F1
Pereira, FP1
Beolchini, M4
Lang, NP3
KeywordsAnimal study
Bone healing
Bone regeneration
Dehiscence defect
Deproteinized bovine bone mineral
Extraction socket
Maxillary incisors
Oral implants
Osseointegration
Issue Date2011
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
CitationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 4, p. 430-437 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.x
AbstractAim: To compare the influence of autologous or deproteinized bovine bone mineral as grafting material on healing of buccal dehiscence defects at implants installed immediately into the maxillary second incisor extraction socket in dogs. Material and methods: In the maxillary second incisor sockets of 12 Labrador dogs, implants were installed immediately following tooth extraction. A standardized buccal defect was created and autologous bone particles or deproteinized bovine bone mineral were used to fill the defects. A collagen membrane was placed to cover the graft material, and the flaps were sutured to fully submerge the experimental areas. Six animals were sacrificed after 2 months, and six after 4 months of healing. Ground sections were obtained for histological evaluation. Results: After 2 months of healing, all implants were osseointegrated. All buccal dehiscence defects were completely filled after 2 months irrespective of the augmentation material (autologous bone or Bio-Oss ®) applied. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) on the denuded implant surfaces was within a normal range of 30-40%. However, the newly formed tissue at 2 months was partially resorbed (>50% of the area measurements) after 4 months. Conclusions: Applying either autologous bone or deproteinized bovine bone mineral to dehiscences at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets resulted in high degree of regeneration of the defects with satisfactory BIC on the denuded implant surface. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
ISSN0905-7161
2011 Impact Factor: 2.514
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.117
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.x
ReferencesReferences in Scopus
DC Field
Value
dc.contributor.authorSantis, ED
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, D
dc.contributor.authorPantani, F
dc.contributor.authorPereira, FP
dc.contributor.authorBeolchini, M
dc.contributor.authorLang, NP
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-17T09:18:04Z
dc.date.available2011-06-17T09:18:04Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare the influence of autologous or deproteinized bovine bone mineral as grafting material on healing of buccal dehiscence defects at implants installed immediately into the maxillary second incisor extraction socket in dogs. Material and methods: In the maxillary second incisor sockets of 12 Labrador dogs, implants were installed immediately following tooth extraction. A standardized buccal defect was created and autologous bone particles or deproteinized bovine bone mineral were used to fill the defects. A collagen membrane was placed to cover the graft material, and the flaps were sutured to fully submerge the experimental areas. Six animals were sacrificed after 2 months, and six after 4 months of healing. Ground sections were obtained for histological evaluation. Results: After 2 months of healing, all implants were osseointegrated. All buccal dehiscence defects were completely filled after 2 months irrespective of the augmentation material (autologous bone or Bio-Oss ®) applied. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) on the denuded implant surfaces was within a normal range of 30-40%. However, the newly formed tissue at 2 months was partially resorbed (>50% of the area measurements) after 4 months. Conclusions: Applying either autologous bone or deproteinized bovine bone mineral to dehiscences at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets resulted in high degree of regeneration of the defects with satisfactory BIC on the denuded implant surface. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 4, p. 430-437 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.x
dc.identifier.citeulike8993404
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.x
dc.identifier.epage437
dc.identifier.hkuros185686
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000288214300011
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden Martina SRL
ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by a grant from Sweden & Martina SRL and by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia. The competent contributions of Professor Luiz Antonio Salata e Mr. Sebastiao Bianco (USP - Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histological processing are highly appreciated. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
2011 Impact Factor: 2.514
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.117
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.openurl
dc.identifier.pmid21561484
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79952520030
dc.identifier.spage430
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/134340
dc.identifier.volume22
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com
dc.subjectAnimal study
dc.subjectBone healing
dc.subjectBone regeneration
dc.subjectDehiscence defect
dc.subjectDeproteinized bovine bone mineral
dc.subjectExtraction socket
dc.subjectMaxillary incisors
dc.subjectOral implants
dc.subjectOsseointegration
dc.titleBone regeneration at implants placed into extraction sockets of maxillary incisors in dogs
dc.typeArticle
Author Affiliations
  1. UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
  2. ARDEC
  3. Prince Philip Dental Hospital
  4. University of Medical Science