File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-27
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-65349139495
- PMID: 19284571
- WOS: WOS:000265837400001
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Bookmarks:
- CiteULike: 2
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Quarantine for pandemic influenza control at the borders of small island nations
Title | Quarantine for pandemic influenza control at the borders of small island nations | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||||||||
Keywords | References (53) View In Table Layout | ||||||||||
Issue Date | 2009 | ||||||||||
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcinfectdis/ | ||||||||||
Citation | Bmc Infectious Diseases, 2009, v. 9 How to Cite? | ||||||||||
Abstract | Background: Although border quarantine is included in many influenza pandemic plans, detailed guidelines have yet to be formulated, including considerations for the optimal quarantine length. Motivated by the situation of small island nations, which will probably experience the introduction of pandemic influenza via just one airport, we examined the potential effectiveness of quarantine as a border control measure. Methods: Analysing the detailed epidemiologic characteristics of influenza, the effectiveness of quarantine at the borders of islands was modelled as the relative reduction of the risk of releasing infectious individuals into the community, explicitly accounting for the presence of asymptomatic infected individuals. The potential benefit of adding the use of rapid diagnostic testing to the quarantine process was also considered. Results: We predict that 95% and 99% effectiveness in preventing the release of infectious individuals into the community could be achieved with quarantine periods of longer than 4.7 and 8.6 days, respectively. If rapid diagnostic testing is combined with quarantine, the lengths of quarantine to achieve 95% and 99% effectiveness could be shortened to 2.6 and 5.7 days, respectively. Sensitivity analysis revealed that quarantine alone for 8.7 days or quarantine for 5.7 days combined with using rapid diagnostic testing could prevent secondary transmissions caused by the released infectious individuals for a plausible range of prevalence at the source country (up to 10%) and for a modest number of incoming travellers (up to 8000 individuals). Conclusion: Quarantine atthe borders of island nations could contribute substantially to preventing the arrival of pandemic influenza (or at least delaying the arrival date). For small island nations we recommend consideration of quarantine alone for 9 days or quarantine for 6 days combined with using rapid diagnostic testing (if available). © 2009 Nishiura et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. | ||||||||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/134211 | ||||||||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.031 | ||||||||||
PubMed Central ID | |||||||||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: We thank the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA) for contributing to funding this research work on pandemic influenza control (via grant: 1 U01 CI000445-01). Early work on this topic was also supported by a research contract with the New Zealand Ministry of Health. The work of HN was supported by the Asian Neighbours Network Program of the Toyota Foundation and The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). | ||||||||||
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nishiura, H | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wilson, N | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Baker, MG | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-13T07:20:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-06-13T07:20:51Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Bmc Infectious Diseases, 2009, v. 9 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2334 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/134211 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Although border quarantine is included in many influenza pandemic plans, detailed guidelines have yet to be formulated, including considerations for the optimal quarantine length. Motivated by the situation of small island nations, which will probably experience the introduction of pandemic influenza via just one airport, we examined the potential effectiveness of quarantine as a border control measure. Methods: Analysing the detailed epidemiologic characteristics of influenza, the effectiveness of quarantine at the borders of islands was modelled as the relative reduction of the risk of releasing infectious individuals into the community, explicitly accounting for the presence of asymptomatic infected individuals. The potential benefit of adding the use of rapid diagnostic testing to the quarantine process was also considered. Results: We predict that 95% and 99% effectiveness in preventing the release of infectious individuals into the community could be achieved with quarantine periods of longer than 4.7 and 8.6 days, respectively. If rapid diagnostic testing is combined with quarantine, the lengths of quarantine to achieve 95% and 99% effectiveness could be shortened to 2.6 and 5.7 days, respectively. Sensitivity analysis revealed that quarantine alone for 8.7 days or quarantine for 5.7 days combined with using rapid diagnostic testing could prevent secondary transmissions caused by the released infectious individuals for a plausible range of prevalence at the source country (up to 10%) and for a modest number of incoming travellers (up to 8000 individuals). Conclusion: Quarantine atthe borders of island nations could contribute substantially to preventing the arrival of pandemic influenza (or at least delaying the arrival date). For small island nations we recommend consideration of quarantine alone for 9 days or quarantine for 6 days combined with using rapid diagnostic testing (if available). © 2009 Nishiura et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcinfectdis/ | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Infectious Diseases | en_HK |
dc.subject | References (53) View In Table Layout | en_US |
dc.title | Quarantine for pandemic influenza control at the borders of small island nations | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Nishiura, H:nishiura@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Nishiura, H=rp01488 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1471-2334-9-27 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19284571 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC2670846 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-65349139495 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-65349139495&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000265837400001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Nishiura, H=7005501836 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wilson, N=23500712800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Baker, MG=7403075366 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 4166734 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1471-2334 | - |