File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Resolving financial disputes in the context of global civil justice reforms

TitleResolving financial disputes in the context of global civil justice reforms
Authors
KeywordsFinancial dispute
Civil justice reforms
Issue Date2011
PublisherCentre for Promoting Ideas. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ijbssnet.com
Citation
International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2011, v. 2 n. 7, p. 37-51 How to Cite?
AbstractIn recent years, many countries have increased their use of alternative mechanisms of dispute resolution to resolve a growing number of financial and commercial disputes. This trend has been supported by civil justice reforms including those within the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Australia, and Canada. The United States, while a common law jurisdiction, nevertheless has seen the growth of appellate mediation programs based on Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such reforms have aimed at encouraging cost effective, expeditious and amicable case handling within the civil justice system. Drawing on comparative crossjurisdictional analysis, this paper reviews the scope and nature of such reforms and examines lessons learned including the implementation of regular evaluation to fine-tune mediation rules in order to maximize their effectiveness.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/133622
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorAli, S-
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T02:12:10Z-
dc.date.available2011-05-24T02:12:10Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Business and Social Science, 2011, v. 2 n. 7, p. 37-51en_US
dc.identifier.issn2219-1933-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/133622-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, many countries have increased their use of alternative mechanisms of dispute resolution to resolve a growing number of financial and commercial disputes. This trend has been supported by civil justice reforms including those within the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Australia, and Canada. The United States, while a common law jurisdiction, nevertheless has seen the growth of appellate mediation programs based on Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such reforms have aimed at encouraging cost effective, expeditious and amicable case handling within the civil justice system. Drawing on comparative crossjurisdictional analysis, this paper reviews the scope and nature of such reforms and examines lessons learned including the implementation of regular evaluation to fine-tune mediation rules in order to maximize their effectiveness.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherCentre for Promoting Ideas. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ijbssnet.com-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Business and Social Scienceen_US
dc.subjectFinancial dispute-
dc.subjectCivil justice reforms-
dc.titleResolving financial disputes in the context of global civil justice reformsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=2219-1933&volume=2&issue=7&spage=37&epage=51&date=2011&atitle=Resolving+financial+disputes+in+the+context+of+global+civil+justice+reforms-
dc.identifier.emailAli, S: sali@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityAli, S=rp01236en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.hkuros185256en_US
dc.identifier.volume2-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage37-
dc.identifier.epage51-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats