File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of distraction osteogenesis versus costochondral graft in reconstruction of temporomandibular joint condylectomy with disc preservation

TitleComparison of distraction osteogenesis versus costochondral graft in reconstruction of temporomandibular joint condylectomy with disc preservation
Authors
Issue Date2011
PublisherWB Saunders Co. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joms
Citation
Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2011, v. 69 n. 2, p. 409-417 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: This study compared transport distraction with costochondral graft in the reconstruction of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with disc preservation. Materials and Methods: Bilateral condylectomies with disc preservation were conducted in 12 adult goats. Transport distraction of the mandibular ramus was performed on 1 side and costochondral graft on the other side. Jaw movements, TMJ healing, and condylar remodeling were assessed by clinical, radiologic, and histologic examinations. Results: Transport distraction and costochondral graft established a new condyle separating from the preserved disc with a joint space. Both techniques showed no significant difference in ankylosis scores up to 24 weeks. Signs of calcification were not noted in the transport distraction or costochondral graft side. No significant change of maximal jaw movements was found at any time point from 2 to 24 weeks. Conclusions: Distraction osteogenesis is an effective reconstruction method for TMJ reconstruction. No significant difference between these 2 techniques in reconstruction of the TMJ was noted. © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/133573
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.631
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.824
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
University of Hong Kong10205073/10971/08002/23/01
Funding Information:

This investigation was supported by a small project funding from the University of Hong Kong (10205073/10971/08002/23/01). We also acknowledge valuable technical assistance from the Laboratory Animal Unit of the Li Ka Sling Faculty of Medicine, and the Centralized Research Laboratories and Oral Radiology Unit of the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong.

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZheng, LWen_HK
dc.contributor.authorMa, Len_HK
dc.contributor.authorShi, XJen_HK
dc.contributor.authorZwahlen, RAen_HK
dc.contributor.authorCheung, LKen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T02:10:47Z-
dc.date.available2011-05-24T02:10:47Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2011, v. 69 n. 2, p. 409-417en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/133573-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study compared transport distraction with costochondral graft in the reconstruction of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with disc preservation. Materials and Methods: Bilateral condylectomies with disc preservation were conducted in 12 adult goats. Transport distraction of the mandibular ramus was performed on 1 side and costochondral graft on the other side. Jaw movements, TMJ healing, and condylar remodeling were assessed by clinical, radiologic, and histologic examinations. Results: Transport distraction and costochondral graft established a new condyle separating from the preserved disc with a joint space. Both techniques showed no significant difference in ankylosis scores up to 24 weeks. Signs of calcification were not noted in the transport distraction or costochondral graft side. No significant change of maximal jaw movements was found at any time point from 2 to 24 weeks. Conclusions: Distraction osteogenesis is an effective reconstruction method for TMJ reconstruction. No significant difference between these 2 techniques in reconstruction of the TMJ was noted. © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWB Saunders Co. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jomsen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_HK
dc.titleComparison of distraction osteogenesis versus costochondral graft in reconstruction of temporomandibular joint condylectomy with disc preservationen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0278-2391&volume=69&issue=2&spage=409&epage=414&date=2011&atitle=Comparison+of+distraction+osteogenesis+versus+costochondral+graft+in+reconstruction+of+temporomandibular+joint+condylectomy+with+disc+preservation-
dc.identifier.emailZheng, LW:lwzheng@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailZwahlen, RA:zwahlen@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailCheung, LK:lkcheung@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityZheng, LW=rp01411en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityZwahlen, RA=rp00055en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, LK=rp00013en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.032en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid21129836-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-78751582095en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros185331en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-78751582095&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume69en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage409en_HK
dc.identifier.epage417en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000287002500014-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZheng, LW=11241247300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMa, L=36072648200en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridShi, XJ=16231469600en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZwahlen, RA=7004217269en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, LK=7102302747en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats