File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of ridge mapping and cone beam computed tomography for planning dental implant therapy.

TitleComparison of ridge mapping and cone beam computed tomography for planning dental implant therapy.
Authors
KeywordsComputed tomography
Dental implant
Measurement
Ridge mapping
Issue Date2011
PublisherQuintessence Publishing Co, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/gp.php?journal_name=OMI&name_abbr=IJOMI
Citation
The International Journal Of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2011, v. 26 n. 1, p. 70-74 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of this study was to compare the relative accuracy of the ridge-mapping method against that of standard computed tomography (CT). Consecutive partially edentulous subjects requiring dental implants were recruited for this prospective study. Vacuum-formed radiographic templates with reference points were used for the ridge-mapping procedure and CT scanning. Ridge-mapping measurements were translated onto study models, which were subjected to CT scanning with the templates in place. CT images of the study models obtained from the ridge-mapping method were compared with CT images of the subjects. The data were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Differences were considered significant if P < .05. Fourteen subjects were recruited and a total of 21 implant sites were evaluated. The ridge dimensions measured by the bone-mapping method and CT scanning were significantly different (P < .05). The mean difference ranged from 0.3 to 0.5 mm, and large variations were found in the sulcus region. Measurements of the alveolar bone dimension using the ridge-mapping method are different from CT scanning, with a mean difference of about 0.4 mm.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/133314
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.859
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.671
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuk, LCen_HK
dc.contributor.authorPow, EHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLi, TKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChow, TWen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-11T08:30:28Z-
dc.date.available2011-05-11T08:30:28Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_HK
dc.identifier.citationThe International Journal Of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2011, v. 26 n. 1, p. 70-74en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/133314-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the relative accuracy of the ridge-mapping method against that of standard computed tomography (CT). Consecutive partially edentulous subjects requiring dental implants were recruited for this prospective study. Vacuum-formed radiographic templates with reference points were used for the ridge-mapping procedure and CT scanning. Ridge-mapping measurements were translated onto study models, which were subjected to CT scanning with the templates in place. CT images of the study models obtained from the ridge-mapping method were compared with CT images of the subjects. The data were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Differences were considered significant if P < .05. Fourteen subjects were recruited and a total of 21 implant sites were evaluated. The ridge dimensions measured by the bone-mapping method and CT scanning were significantly different (P < .05). The mean difference ranged from 0.3 to 0.5 mm, and large variations were found in the sulcus region. Measurements of the alveolar bone dimension using the ridge-mapping method are different from CT scanning, with a mean difference of about 0.4 mm.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/gp.php?journal_name=OMI&name_abbr=IJOMIen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofThe International journal of oral & maxillofacial implantsen_HK
dc.subjectComputed tomography-
dc.subjectDental implant-
dc.subjectMeasurement-
dc.subjectRidge mapping-
dc.titleComparison of ridge mapping and cone beam computed tomography for planning dental implant therapy.en_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0882-2786&volume=26&issue=1&spage=70&epage=74&date=2011&atitle=Comparison+of+ridge+mapping+and+cone+beam+computerized+tomography+for+planning+dental+implant+therapy-
dc.identifier.emailPow, EH:ehnpow@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityPow, EH=rp00030en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid21365040-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79955004375en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros184981en_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage70en_HK
dc.identifier.epage74en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000287565500006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLuk, LC=37016576200en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPow, EH=6603825799en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLi, TK=37097562500en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChow, TW=37096630900en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats