File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1038/ajg.2009.202
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-68349146553
- PMID: 19455125
- WOS: WOS:000268965300019
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Repeat-screening colonoscopy 5 years after normal baseline-screening colonoscopy in average-risk chinese: A prospective study
Title | Repeat-screening colonoscopy 5 years after normal baseline-screening colonoscopy in average-risk chinese: A prospective study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | References (29) View In Table Layout |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | Nature Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/ajg/index.html |
Citation | American Journal Of Gastroenterology, 2009, v. 104 n. 8, p. 2028-2034 How to Cite? |
Abstract | OBJECTIVES: Although colonoscopy is considered the most accurate screening tool for colorectal neoplasm, the optimal interval of repeating a screening colonoscopy, particularly in average-risk subjects after a negative colonoscopy, is poorly defined. We determine the 5-year risk of advanced neoplasia on rescreening colonoscopy in a cohort of average-risk Chinese subjects.METHODS:We invited a cohort of asymptomatic average-risk Chinese subjects (aged 55-75 years) who were recruited in our previous screening colonoscopy studies to undergo a repeat colonoscopy at the end of 5 years. The rates of advanced colorectal neoplasia at the end of 5 years in these subjects were determined according to their baseline colonoscopy findings.RESULTS:A total of 511 of the 620 eligible subjects underwent repeat-screening colonoscopy at the end of 5 years. Among them, 401 subjects had no baseline neoplasia (370 with no baseline polyps and 31 with hyperplastic polyps). In subjects with no baseline polyp, 24.6% were found to have at least one adenoma and 1.4% had advanced neoplasia on rescreening. The number needed to rescreen for one advanced neoplasia in subjects with no baseline polyp was 74 (95% confidence interval (CI), 32-168). The prevalence of advanced neoplasia at 5 years in subjects with baseline-advanced neoplasia was 20.7% (relative risk 19.6; 95% CI, 5.2-74.1; vs. subjects with no baseline polyp). The presence of baseline-advanced neoplasia (odds ratio (OR) 13.1; 95% CI, 4.1-41.7) and age in years (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22) are two independent factors for development of advanced neoplasia at 5 years.CONCLUSIONS:The risk of advanced neoplasia is sufficiently low 5 years after a normal screening colonoscopy in Chinese subjects. © 2009 by the American College of Gastroenterology. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/132849 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 8.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.391 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Leung, WK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, JY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Suen, BY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, GL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chow, DK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, LH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | To, KF | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Yim, CK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, ES | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tsoi, KK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, SS | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Sung, JJ | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-04T07:57:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-04-04T07:57:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | American Journal Of Gastroenterology, 2009, v. 104 n. 8, p. 2028-2034 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0002-9270 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/132849 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: Although colonoscopy is considered the most accurate screening tool for colorectal neoplasm, the optimal interval of repeating a screening colonoscopy, particularly in average-risk subjects after a negative colonoscopy, is poorly defined. We determine the 5-year risk of advanced neoplasia on rescreening colonoscopy in a cohort of average-risk Chinese subjects.METHODS:We invited a cohort of asymptomatic average-risk Chinese subjects (aged 55-75 years) who were recruited in our previous screening colonoscopy studies to undergo a repeat colonoscopy at the end of 5 years. The rates of advanced colorectal neoplasia at the end of 5 years in these subjects were determined according to their baseline colonoscopy findings.RESULTS:A total of 511 of the 620 eligible subjects underwent repeat-screening colonoscopy at the end of 5 years. Among them, 401 subjects had no baseline neoplasia (370 with no baseline polyps and 31 with hyperplastic polyps). In subjects with no baseline polyp, 24.6% were found to have at least one adenoma and 1.4% had advanced neoplasia on rescreening. The number needed to rescreen for one advanced neoplasia in subjects with no baseline polyp was 74 (95% confidence interval (CI), 32-168). The prevalence of advanced neoplasia at 5 years in subjects with baseline-advanced neoplasia was 20.7% (relative risk 19.6; 95% CI, 5.2-74.1; vs. subjects with no baseline polyp). The presence of baseline-advanced neoplasia (odds ratio (OR) 13.1; 95% CI, 4.1-41.7) and age in years (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22) are two independent factors for development of advanced neoplasia at 5 years.CONCLUSIONS:The risk of advanced neoplasia is sufficiently low 5 years after a normal screening colonoscopy in Chinese subjects. © 2009 by the American College of Gastroenterology. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Nature Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/ajg/index.html | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | American Journal of Gastroenterology | en_HK |
dc.subject | References (29) View In Table Layout | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | China | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Follow-Up Studies | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Prospective Studies | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Risk Factors | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Time Factors | en_HK |
dc.title | Repeat-screening colonoscopy 5 years after normal baseline-screening colonoscopy in average-risk chinese: A prospective study | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Leung, WK:waikleung@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Leung, WK=rp01479 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/ajg.2009.202 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19455125 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-68349146553 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-68349146553&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 104 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 8 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 2028 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 2034 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1572-0241 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000268965300019 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Leung, WK=7201504523 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lau, JY=34667994100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Suen, BY=6506058430 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, GL=35277444000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chow, DK=36788133300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lai, LH=12759998700 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | To, KF=7101911940 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yim, CK=35277839800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lee, ES=35276871200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tsoi, KK=36869118100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ng, SS=35277520800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Sung, JJ=36847007300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0002-9270 | - |