File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Selective attention modulates motion speed learning by suppressing visible irrelevant stimuli
Title | Selective attention modulates motion speed learning by suppressing visible irrelevant stimuli |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | Pion Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.perceptionweb.com |
Citation | The 32nd European Conference on Visual Perception, Regensburg, Germany, 24-28 August 2009. In Perception, v. 38, abstract suppl., p. 138 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Selective attention modulates perceptual learning in motion speed, but previous studies were unable to answer whether selective attention modulates learning by enhancing the attended signal, suppressing the ignored signal, or a combination of the two. We investigated this question by separating the attended/ignored signals in two disparity-defined depths. The learning stimuli contain speed change in one specific direction (target direction) at one specific depth plane (target depth), with another depth plane (non-target depth) containing either nothing (control group), or distractor dots moving in random direction random-direction group) or orthogonal to target direction (orthogonal-direction group). Observers' 80%-correct motion coherence detection thresholds at two depth planes were measured before and after six hourly sessions of speed discrimination. After learning, observers' motion sensitivity increased by an average 23% at target depth plane at all tested directions in all three conditions, as well as at the non-target depth plane when no distractors were present (control condition) (21%). At conditions where clearly visible moving distractors in either non-specific (random) or specific (orthogonal) direction, there is a clear disadvantage at the distractor direction(s) (6%, 0%). Our results strongly suggest that selective attention modulates motion speed learning largely by suppressing visible irrelevant stimuli. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/132202 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.584 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wang, SW | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tseng, CH | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-03-21T09:01:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-03-21T09:01:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | The 32nd European Conference on Visual Perception, Regensburg, Germany, 24-28 August 2009. In Perception, v. 38, abstract suppl., p. 138 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0301-0066 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/132202 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Selective attention modulates perceptual learning in motion speed, but previous studies were unable to answer whether selective attention modulates learning by enhancing the attended signal, suppressing the ignored signal, or a combination of the two. We investigated this question by separating the attended/ignored signals in two disparity-defined depths. The learning stimuli contain speed change in one specific direction (target direction) at one specific depth plane (target depth), with another depth plane (non-target depth) containing either nothing (control group), or distractor dots moving in random direction random-direction group) or orthogonal to target direction (orthogonal-direction group). Observers' 80%-correct motion coherence detection thresholds at two depth planes were measured before and after six hourly sessions of speed discrimination. After learning, observers' motion sensitivity increased by an average 23% at target depth plane at all tested directions in all three conditions, as well as at the non-target depth plane when no distractors were present (control condition) (21%). At conditions where clearly visible moving distractors in either non-specific (random) or specific (orthogonal) direction, there is a clear disadvantage at the distractor direction(s) (6%, 0%). Our results strongly suggest that selective attention modulates motion speed learning largely by suppressing visible irrelevant stimuli. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Pion Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.perceptionweb.com | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Perception | en_US |
dc.title | Selective attention modulates motion speed learning by suppressing visible irrelevant stimuli | en_US |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Wang, SW: SWWang@gmail.com | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Tseng, CH: tseng@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Tseng, CH=rp00640 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 177437 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 38, abstract suppl. | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 138 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 138 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.description.other | The 32nd European Conference on Visual Perception, Regensburg, Germany, 24-28 August 2009. In Perception, v. 38, abstract suppl., p. 138 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0301-0066 | - |