File Download
Supplementary

Conference Paper: The CFA and civil procedure

TitleThe CFA and civil procedure
Authors
KeywordsCivil procedure
Hong Kong
Issue Date2010
PublisherSocial Science Electronic Publishing, Inc..
Citation
The 2010 Conference on Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal: The Andrew Li Court 1997-2010, Hong Kong, March 2010. How to Cite?
AbstractApproximately 80 CFA judgments between 1997 and 2010 touched upon civil procedure. About a quarter of those decisions concerned the CFA’s own procedures (i.e. when leave to appeal will be granted), and almost as many dealt with costs. Far fewer addressed weightier matters such as pleadings or evidence. An examination of some of the CFA’s decisions is a worthwhile exercise given the significance to practitioners and their clients of what the court’s members said from 1997 to 2010. This paper will do so in the sequence that procedural issues are usually encountered by parties (i.e. pleadings followed by discovery and so on). It is not a review of every case considered by the CFA – or even of every case on a specific issue – but a ‘snapshot’ that, it is hoped, will illustrate how the CFA approached some potentially tricky procedural issues during this formative period of its history.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/128023
SSRN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeggitt, Gen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-31T14:00:28Z-
dc.date.available2010-10-31T14:00:28Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_HK
dc.identifier.citationThe 2010 Conference on Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal: The Andrew Li Court 1997-2010, Hong Kong, March 2010.en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/128023-
dc.description.abstractApproximately 80 CFA judgments between 1997 and 2010 touched upon civil procedure. About a quarter of those decisions concerned the CFA’s own procedures (i.e. when leave to appeal will be granted), and almost as many dealt with costs. Far fewer addressed weightier matters such as pleadings or evidence. An examination of some of the CFA’s decisions is a worthwhile exercise given the significance to practitioners and their clients of what the court’s members said from 1997 to 2010. This paper will do so in the sequence that procedural issues are usually encountered by parties (i.e. pleadings followed by discovery and so on). It is not a review of every case considered by the CFA – or even of every case on a specific issue – but a ‘snapshot’ that, it is hoped, will illustrate how the CFA approached some potentially tricky procedural issues during this formative period of its history.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherSocial Science Electronic Publishing, Inc..-
dc.relation.ispartof'Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal: The Andrew Li Court 1997-2010' Conference 2010-
dc.rights© 2011 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. For personal & noncommercial use apply only to specific documents and use of specific SSRN-provided statistics and other information.-
dc.subjectCivil procedure-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.titleThe CFA and civil procedureen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.emailMeggitt, G: garym@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityMeggitt, G=rp01284en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros179265en_HK
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.ssrn2290135-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats