File Download
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: The CFA and civil procedure
Title | The CFA and civil procedure |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Civil procedure Hong Kong |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Publisher | Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc.. |
Citation | The 2010 Conference on Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal: The Andrew Li Court 1997-2010, Hong Kong, March 2010. How to Cite? |
Abstract | Approximately 80 CFA judgments between 1997 and 2010 touched upon civil procedure. About a quarter of those decisions concerned the CFA’s own procedures (i.e. when leave to appeal will be granted), and almost as many dealt with costs. Far fewer addressed weightier matters such as pleadings or evidence. An examination of some of the CFA’s decisions is a worthwhile exercise given the significance to practitioners and their clients of what the court’s members said from 1997 to 2010. This paper will do so in the sequence that procedural issues are usually encountered by parties (i.e. pleadings followed by discovery and so on). It is not a review of every case considered by the CFA – or even of every case on a specific issue – but a ‘snapshot’ that, it is hoped, will illustrate how the CFA approached some potentially tricky procedural issues during this formative period of its history. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/128023 |
SSRN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Meggitt, G | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-10-31T14:00:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-10-31T14:00:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | The 2010 Conference on Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal: The Andrew Li Court 1997-2010, Hong Kong, March 2010. | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/128023 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Approximately 80 CFA judgments between 1997 and 2010 touched upon civil procedure. About a quarter of those decisions concerned the CFA’s own procedures (i.e. when leave to appeal will be granted), and almost as many dealt with costs. Far fewer addressed weightier matters such as pleadings or evidence. An examination of some of the CFA’s decisions is a worthwhile exercise given the significance to practitioners and their clients of what the court’s members said from 1997 to 2010. This paper will do so in the sequence that procedural issues are usually encountered by parties (i.e. pleadings followed by discovery and so on). It is not a review of every case considered by the CFA – or even of every case on a specific issue – but a ‘snapshot’ that, it is hoped, will illustrate how the CFA approached some potentially tricky procedural issues during this formative period of its history. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc.. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | 'Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal: The Andrew Li Court 1997-2010' Conference 2010 | - |
dc.rights | © 2011 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. For personal & noncommercial use apply only to specific documents and use of specific SSRN-provided statistics and other information. | - |
dc.subject | Civil procedure | - |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | - |
dc.title | The CFA and civil procedure | en_HK |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Meggitt, G: garym@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Meggitt, G=rp01284 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 179265 | en_HK |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.ssrn | 2290135 | - |