Conference Paper: A visual manipulation used to examine the neural processing underpinning skilled interceptive movements

File Download
Supplementary
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleA visual manipulation used to examine the neural processing underpinning skilled interceptive movements
AuthorsMann, DL
Abernethy, B
Farrow, D
KeywordsPsychology sports and games medical sciences
Sports medicine
Issue Date2010
PublisherHuman Kinetics.
CitationThe 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity (NASPSPA 2010), Tucson, AZ., 10-12 June 2010. In Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2010, v. 32 suppl., p. S107 [How to Cite?]
AbstractCoupled interceptive actions are understood to be the result of neural processing - and visual information - which is distinct from that used for uncoupled perceptual responses. To date, the majority of studies examining skilled interception have relied on uncoupled perceptual responses; as a result it has been suggested that our current knowledge of the neural processes underpinning skilled interception is somewhat limited and biased (van der Kamp, Rivas, van Doorn, & Savelsbergh, 2008). Based on the distribution of the human visual pathways, it is understood that perceptual-cognitive responses produced by the ventral pathway rely on visual information of better quality than the relatively blurred information used for online interceptive responses produced by the dorsal pathway. As a result it was hypothesised that low levels of visual blur would adversely affect a coupled response, but not an uncoupled one. To examine the visual information used for action and perception, skilled cricket batters anticipated the direction of balls bowled towards them using a coupled hitting movement and an uncoupled verbal response in each of four different visual blur conditions (plano, 1.00, 2.00, 3.00). When anticipating outcomes with habitual (unblurred) vision, coupled responses were found to be more accurate than uncoupled ones (p < .01), highlighting the importance of the relationship between perception and action when seeking to examine perceptual-motor skills. ANOVA testing revealed a significant interaction between coupling and blur (F(3,18) = 3.70, p < .05). Low levels of visual blur did not affect coupled anticipation, a finding consistent with the relatively poorer visual information which online interceptive actions are proposed to rely on. In contrast, evidence was found to suggest that low levels of blur may enhance the uncoupled (verbal) perception of movement. This rather counterintuitive finding is considered in light of other psychological studies which have reported enhanced movement perception with the introduction of visual blur.
DescriptionThis journal suppl. contains NASPSPA 2010 Conference Program & Abstracts
Free Communications - Verbal and Poster: Motor Development, Motor Learning and Control, and Sport and Exercise Psychology
ISSN0895-2779
2011 Impact Factor: 2.658
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.080
DC Field
Value
dc.contributor.authorMann, DL
dc.contributor.authorAbernethy, B
dc.contributor.authorFarrow, D
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-31T13:53:03Z
dc.date.available2010-10-31T13:53:03Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractCoupled interceptive actions are understood to be the result of neural processing - and visual information - which is distinct from that used for uncoupled perceptual responses. To date, the majority of studies examining skilled interception have relied on uncoupled perceptual responses; as a result it has been suggested that our current knowledge of the neural processes underpinning skilled interception is somewhat limited and biased (van der Kamp, Rivas, van Doorn, & Savelsbergh, 2008). Based on the distribution of the human visual pathways, it is understood that perceptual-cognitive responses produced by the ventral pathway rely on visual information of better quality than the relatively blurred information used for online interceptive responses produced by the dorsal pathway. As a result it was hypothesised that low levels of visual blur would adversely affect a coupled response, but not an uncoupled one. To examine the visual information used for action and perception, skilled cricket batters anticipated the direction of balls bowled towards them using a coupled hitting movement and an uncoupled verbal response in each of four different visual blur conditions (plano, 1.00, 2.00, 3.00). When anticipating outcomes with habitual (unblurred) vision, coupled responses were found to be more accurate than uncoupled ones (p < .01), highlighting the importance of the relationship between perception and action when seeking to examine perceptual-motor skills. ANOVA testing revealed a significant interaction between coupling and blur (F(3,18) = 3.70, p < .05). Low levels of visual blur did not affect coupled anticipation, a finding consistent with the relatively poorer visual information which online interceptive actions are proposed to rely on. In contrast, evidence was found to suggest that low levels of blur may enhance the uncoupled (verbal) perception of movement. This rather counterintuitive finding is considered in light of other psychological studies which have reported enhanced movement perception with the introduction of visual blur.
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version
dc.descriptionThis journal suppl. contains NASPSPA 2010 Conference Program & Abstracts
dc.descriptionFree Communications - Verbal and Poster: Motor Development, Motor Learning and Control, and Sport and Exercise Psychology
dc.description.otherThe 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity (NASPSPA 2010), Tucson, AZ., 10-12 June 2010. In Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2010, v. 32 suppl., p. S107
dc.identifier.citationThe 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity (NASPSPA 2010), Tucson, AZ., 10-12 June 2010. In Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2010, v. 32 suppl., p. S107 [How to Cite?]
dc.identifier.epageS107
dc.identifier.hkuros182660
dc.identifier.issn0895-2779
2011 Impact Factor: 2.658
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.080
dc.identifier.issuesuppl.
dc.identifier.spageS107
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/127897
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherHuman Kinetics.
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License
dc.subjectPsychology sports and games medical sciences
dc.subjectSports medicine
dc.titleA visual manipulation used to examine the neural processing underpinning skilled interceptive movements
dc.typeConference_Paper