File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Household investment in structured financial product: pulled or pushed?
Title | Household investment in structured financial product: pulled or pushed? |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Structured products Financial literacy Ambiguity aversion |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Citation | The 4th Joint Economics Symposium of Five Leading East Asian Universities, Hong Kong, 29 January 2010. How to Cite? |
Abstract | Why did individual investors buy structured financial products? Were they too greedy to consider the risk involved? Or did the banks lure them to buy? Using unique household investment data from Hong Kong, we show that investor demand of such products (the ‘push’ effect) was not the key driver. Important determinants according to portfolio theories, such as product premium, have little explanatory power to investor's actual allocation decisions. More financially literate investors who can form reasonable expectations about stocks bought less. Education, IQ, and relationship with the distributing banks are statistically significant explanatory variables. However, we can only explain one-fifth of the cross-sectional variations of investment in structured products. The rest could be due to bounded rational investor behaviors and mis-selling by distributors. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/127320 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chang, EC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, DY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, M | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-10-31T13:18:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-10-31T13:18:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | The 4th Joint Economics Symposium of Five Leading East Asian Universities, Hong Kong, 29 January 2010. | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/127320 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Why did individual investors buy structured financial products? Were they too greedy to consider the risk involved? Or did the banks lure them to buy? Using unique household investment data from Hong Kong, we show that investor demand of such products (the ‘push’ effect) was not the key driver. Important determinants according to portfolio theories, such as product premium, have little explanatory power to investor's actual allocation decisions. More financially literate investors who can form reasonable expectations about stocks bought less. Education, IQ, and relationship with the distributing banks are statistically significant explanatory variables. However, we can only explain one-fifth of the cross-sectional variations of investment in structured products. The rest could be due to bounded rational investor behaviors and mis-selling by distributors. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Joint Economics Symposium of Five Leading East Asian Universities | - |
dc.subject | Structured products | - |
dc.subject | Financial literacy | - |
dc.subject | Ambiguity aversion | - |
dc.title | Household investment in structured financial product: pulled or pushed? | en_HK |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Chang, EC: ecchang@business.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Tang, DY: yjtang@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Zhang, M: benzhang@hku.hk, rainozhang@gmail.com | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 181506 | en_HK |