File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: The Swindle of Fragmented Criminalization: Continuing Piecemeal Responses to International Terrorism and Al Qaeda

TitleThe Swindle of Fragmented Criminalization: Continuing Piecemeal Responses to International Terrorism and Al Qaeda
Authors
Issue Date2009
PublisherNew England School of Law. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nesl.edu/students/law_review.cfm
Citation
New England Law Review, 2009, v. 43 n. 3, p. 377-436 How to Cite?
AbstractBy comparing the counter-terrorism conventions and Security Council resolutions from before and after the September 11 attacks, this Article challenges the relatively common notion that the criminalization effort to combat international terrorism, including Al Qaeda, significantly has improved since the September 11 attacks.On the contrary, whereas the instruments before the September 11 attacks required states to criminalize specific acts normally associated with terrorism without having to define “terrorism” or “terrorist acts,” states now are required to define these terms for themselves, thus further fragmenting the international approach to combating this scourge. This Article calls for a renewed commitment to improving that approach.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/124763
ISSN
2007 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.123

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFry, JDen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-31T10:52:47Z-
dc.date.available2010-10-31T10:52:47Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_HK
dc.identifier.citationNew England Law Review, 2009, v. 43 n. 3, p. 377-436en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0028-4823-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/124763-
dc.description.abstractBy comparing the counter-terrorism conventions and Security Council resolutions from before and after the September 11 attacks, this Article challenges the relatively common notion that the criminalization effort to combat international terrorism, including Al Qaeda, significantly has improved since the September 11 attacks.On the contrary, whereas the instruments before the September 11 attacks required states to criminalize specific acts normally associated with terrorism without having to define “terrorism” or “terrorist acts,” states now are required to define these terms for themselves, thus further fragmenting the international approach to combating this scourge. This Article calls for a renewed commitment to improving that approach.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherNew England School of Law. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nesl.edu/students/law_review.cfm-
dc.relation.ispartofNew England Law Reviewen_HK
dc.titleThe Swindle of Fragmented Criminalization: Continuing Piecemeal Responses to International Terrorism and Al Qaedaen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0028-4823&volume=43&issue=3&spage=377&epage=436&date=2009&atitle=The+Swindle+of+Fragmented+Criminalization:+Continuing+Piecemeal+Responses+to+International+Terrorism+and+Al+Qaeda+(lead+article)-
dc.identifier.emailFry, JD: jamesdfry@yahoo.comen_HK
dc.identifier.authorityFry, JD=rp01244en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros175928en_HK
dc.identifier.volume43en_HK
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage377en_HK
dc.identifier.epage436en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats