Article: Hard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs

File Download Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
Supplementary
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleHard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs
AuthorsCaneva, M1
Salata, LA5
de Souza, SS5
Bressan, E2
Botticelli, D4
Lang, NP3
Issue Date2010
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
CitationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 9, p. 885-890 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.x
AbstractObjectives: To evaluate the influence of implant size and configuration on osseointegration in implants immediately placed into extraction sockets. Material and methods: Implants were installed immediately into extraction sockets in the mandibles of six Labrador dogs. In the control sites, cylindrical transmucosal implants (3.3 mm diameter) were installed, while in the test sites, larger and conical (root formed, 5 mm diameter) implants were installed. After 4 months of healing, the resorptive patterns of the alveolar crest were evaluated histomorphometrically. Results: With one exception, all implants were integrated in mineralized bone, mainly composed of mature lamellar bone. The alveolar crest underwent resorption at the control as well as at the test implants. This resorption was more pronounced at the buccal aspects and significantly greater at the test (2.7±0.4 mm) than at the control implants (1.5±0.6 mm). However, the control implants were associated with residual defects that were deeper at the lingual than at the buccal aspects, while these defects were virtually absent at test implants. Conclusions: The installment of root formed wide implants immediately into extraction sockets will not prevent the resorption of the alveolar crest. In contrast, this resorption is more marked both at the buccal and lingual aspects of root formed wide than at standard cylindrical implants. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
ISSN0905-7161
2011 Impact Factor: 2.514
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.117
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.x
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000280630200001
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden & Martina (Due Carrare, Padova, Italy)
ARDEC (Ariminum Odontologica, Rimini, Italy)
Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the Promotion of Oral Health, Brienz, Switzerland
Funding Information:

This study has been supported in part by a grant from Sweden & Martina (Due Carrare, Padova, Italy), ARDEC (Ariminum Odontologica, Rimini, Italy) and the Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the Promotion of Oral Health, Brienz, Switzerland. The competent contributions of Mr Sebastiao Bianco, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil in the histological processing are highly appreciated.

ReferencesReferences in Scopus
DC Field
Value
dc.contributor.authorCaneva, M
dc.contributor.authorSalata, LA
dc.contributor.authorde Souza, SS
dc.contributor.authorBressan, E
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, D
dc.contributor.authorLang, NP
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-31T10:33:47Z
dc.date.available2010-10-31T10:33:47Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the influence of implant size and configuration on osseointegration in implants immediately placed into extraction sockets. Material and methods: Implants were installed immediately into extraction sockets in the mandibles of six Labrador dogs. In the control sites, cylindrical transmucosal implants (3.3 mm diameter) were installed, while in the test sites, larger and conical (root formed, 5 mm diameter) implants were installed. After 4 months of healing, the resorptive patterns of the alveolar crest were evaluated histomorphometrically. Results: With one exception, all implants were integrated in mineralized bone, mainly composed of mature lamellar bone. The alveolar crest underwent resorption at the control as well as at the test implants. This resorption was more pronounced at the buccal aspects and significantly greater at the test (2.7±0.4 mm) than at the control implants (1.5±0.6 mm). However, the control implants were associated with residual defects that were deeper at the lingual than at the buccal aspects, while these defects were virtually absent at test implants. Conclusions: The installment of root formed wide implants immediately into extraction sockets will not prevent the resorption of the alveolar crest. In contrast, this resorption is more marked both at the buccal and lingual aspects of root formed wide than at standard cylindrical implants. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 9, p. 885-890 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.x
dc.identifier.citeulike7604540
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.x
dc.identifier.epage890
dc.identifier.hkuros182850
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000280630200001
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden & Martina (Due Carrare, Padova, Italy)
ARDEC (Ariminum Odontologica, Rimini, Italy)
Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the Promotion of Oral Health, Brienz, Switzerland
Funding Information:

This study has been supported in part by a grant from Sweden & Martina (Due Carrare, Padova, Italy), ARDEC (Ariminum Odontologica, Rimini, Italy) and the Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the Promotion of Oral Health, Brienz, Switzerland. The competent contributions of Mr Sebastiao Bianco, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil in the histological processing are highly appreciated.

dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
2011 Impact Factor: 2.514
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.117
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.openurl
dc.identifier.pmid20491839
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77955351268
dc.identifier.spage885
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/124427
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Bone Loss - classification - pathology
dc.subject.meshAnimals
dc.subject.meshBicuspid - surgery
dc.subject.meshCalcification, Physiologic - physiology
dc.subject.meshDental Abutments
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseous - methods
dc.subject.meshDental Implants
dc.subject.meshDental Materials - chemistry
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis Design
dc.subject.meshDogs
dc.subject.meshMandible - pathology - surgery
dc.subject.meshModels, Animal
dc.subject.meshOsseointegration - physiology
dc.subject.meshOsteogenesis - physiology
dc.subject.meshSurface Properties
dc.subject.meshTime Factors
dc.subject.meshTitanium - chemistry
dc.subject.meshTooth Extraction
dc.subject.meshTooth Socket - pathology - surgery
dc.subject.meshWound Healing - physiology
dc.titleHard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs
dc.typeArticle
Author Affiliations
  1. UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
  2. Università degli Studi di Padova
  3. The University of Hong Kong
  4. null
  5. Universidade de Sao Paulo