File Download
 
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
 
Supplementary

Article: Hard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleHard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs
 
AuthorsCaneva, M2
Salata, LA5
de Souza, SS5
Bressan, E1
Botticelli, D4
Lang, NP3
 
Issue Date2010
 
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
 
CitationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 9, p. 885-890 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.x
 
AbstractObjectives: To evaluate the influence of implant size and configuration on osseointegration in implants immediately placed into extraction sockets. Material and methods: Implants were installed immediately into extraction sockets in the mandibles of six Labrador dogs. In the control sites, cylindrical transmucosal implants (3.3 mm diameter) were installed, while in the test sites, larger and conical (root formed, 5 mm diameter) implants were installed. After 4 months of healing, the resorptive patterns of the alveolar crest were evaluated histomorphometrically. Results: With one exception, all implants were integrated in mineralized bone, mainly composed of mature lamellar bone. The alveolar crest underwent resorption at the control as well as at the test implants. This resorption was more pronounced at the buccal aspects and significantly greater at the test (2.7±0.4 mm) than at the control implants (1.5±0.6 mm). However, the control implants were associated with residual defects that were deeper at the lingual than at the buccal aspects, while these defects were virtually absent at test implants. Conclusions: The installment of root formed wide implants immediately into extraction sockets will not prevent the resorption of the alveolar crest. In contrast, this resorption is more marked both at the buccal and lingual aspects of root formed wide than at standard cylindrical implants. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
 
ISSN0905-7161
2013 Impact Factor: 3.123
 
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.x
 
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000280630200001
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden & Martina (Due Carrare, Padova, Italy)
ARDEC (Ariminum Odontologica, Rimini, Italy)
Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the Promotion of Oral Health, Brienz, Switzerland
Funding Information:

This study has been supported in part by a grant from Sweden & Martina (Due Carrare, Padova, Italy), ARDEC (Ariminum Odontologica, Rimini, Italy) and the Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the Promotion of Oral Health, Brienz, Switzerland. The competent contributions of Mr Sebastiao Bianco, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil in the histological processing are highly appreciated.

 
ReferencesReferences in Scopus
 
DC FieldValue
dc.contributor.authorCaneva, M
 
dc.contributor.authorSalata, LA
 
dc.contributor.authorde Souza, SS
 
dc.contributor.authorBressan, E
 
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, D
 
dc.contributor.authorLang, NP
 
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-31T10:33:47Z
 
dc.date.available2010-10-31T10:33:47Z
 
dc.date.issued2010
 
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the influence of implant size and configuration on osseointegration in implants immediately placed into extraction sockets. Material and methods: Implants were installed immediately into extraction sockets in the mandibles of six Labrador dogs. In the control sites, cylindrical transmucosal implants (3.3 mm diameter) were installed, while in the test sites, larger and conical (root formed, 5 mm diameter) implants were installed. After 4 months of healing, the resorptive patterns of the alveolar crest were evaluated histomorphometrically. Results: With one exception, all implants were integrated in mineralized bone, mainly composed of mature lamellar bone. The alveolar crest underwent resorption at the control as well as at the test implants. This resorption was more pronounced at the buccal aspects and significantly greater at the test (2.7±0.4 mm) than at the control implants (1.5±0.6 mm). However, the control implants were associated with residual defects that were deeper at the lingual than at the buccal aspects, while these defects were virtually absent at test implants. Conclusions: The installment of root formed wide implants immediately into extraction sockets will not prevent the resorption of the alveolar crest. In contrast, this resorption is more marked both at the buccal and lingual aspects of root formed wide than at standard cylindrical implants. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
 
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
 
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 9, p. 885-890 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.x
 
dc.identifier.citeulike7604540
 
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.x
 
dc.identifier.epage890
 
dc.identifier.hkuros182850
 
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000280630200001
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden & Martina (Due Carrare, Padova, Italy)
ARDEC (Ariminum Odontologica, Rimini, Italy)
Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the Promotion of Oral Health, Brienz, Switzerland
Funding Information:

This study has been supported in part by a grant from Sweden & Martina (Due Carrare, Padova, Italy), ARDEC (Ariminum Odontologica, Rimini, Italy) and the Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the Promotion of Oral Health, Brienz, Switzerland. The competent contributions of Mr Sebastiao Bianco, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil in the histological processing are highly appreciated.

 
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
2013 Impact Factor: 3.123
 
dc.identifier.issue9
 
dc.identifier.openurl
 
dc.identifier.pmid20491839
 
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77955351268
 
dc.identifier.spage885
 
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/124427
 
dc.identifier.volume21
 
dc.languageeng
 
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
 
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
 
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research
 
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
 
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Bone Loss - classification - pathology
 
dc.subject.meshAnimals
 
dc.subject.meshBicuspid - surgery
 
dc.subject.meshCalcification, Physiologic - physiology
 
dc.subject.meshDental Abutments
 
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseous - methods
 
dc.subject.meshDental Implants
 
dc.subject.meshDental Materials - chemistry
 
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis Design
 
dc.subject.meshDogs
 
dc.subject.meshMandible - pathology - surgery
 
dc.subject.meshModels, Animal
 
dc.subject.meshOsseointegration - physiology
 
dc.subject.meshOsteogenesis - physiology
 
dc.subject.meshSurface Properties
 
dc.subject.meshTime Factors
 
dc.subject.meshTitanium - chemistry
 
dc.subject.meshTooth Extraction
 
dc.subject.meshTooth Socket - pathology - surgery
 
dc.subject.meshWound Healing - physiology
 
dc.titleHard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs
 
dc.typeArticle
 
<?xml encoding="utf-8" version="1.0"?>
<item><contributor.author>Caneva, M</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Salata, LA</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>de Souza, SS</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Bressan, E</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Botticelli, D</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Lang, NP</contributor.author>
<date.accessioned>2010-10-31T10:33:47Z</date.accessioned>
<date.available>2010-10-31T10:33:47Z</date.available>
<date.issued>2010</date.issued>
<identifier.citation>Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 9, p. 885-890</identifier.citation>
<identifier.issn>0905-7161</identifier.issn>
<identifier.uri>http://hdl.handle.net/10722/124427</identifier.uri>
<description.abstract>Objectives: To evaluate the influence of implant size and configuration on osseointegration in implants immediately placed into extraction sockets. Material and methods: Implants were installed immediately into extraction sockets in the mandibles of six Labrador dogs. In the control sites, cylindrical transmucosal implants (3.3 mm diameter) were installed, while in the test sites, larger and conical (root formed, 5 mm diameter) implants were installed. After 4 months of healing, the resorptive patterns of the alveolar crest were evaluated histomorphometrically. Results: With one exception, all implants were integrated in mineralized bone, mainly composed of mature lamellar bone. The alveolar crest underwent resorption at the control as well as at the test implants. This resorption was more pronounced at the buccal aspects and significantly greater at the test (2.7&#177;0.4 mm) than at the control implants (1.5&#177;0.6 mm). However, the control implants were associated with residual defects that were deeper at the lingual than at the buccal aspects, while these defects were virtually absent at test implants. Conclusions: The installment of root formed wide implants immediately into extraction sockets will not prevent the resorption of the alveolar crest. In contrast, this resorption is more marked both at the buccal and lingual aspects of root formed wide than at standard cylindrical implants. &#169; 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S.</description.abstract>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal&apos;s web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR</publisher>
<relation.ispartof>Clinical Oral Implants Research</relation.ispartof>
<subject.mesh>Alveolar Bone Loss - classification - pathology</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Animals</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Bicuspid - surgery</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Calcification, Physiologic - physiology</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Abutments</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Implants</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dogs</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Mandible - pathology - surgery</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Models, Animal</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Osseointegration - physiology</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Osteogenesis - physiology</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Surface Properties</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Time Factors</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Titanium - chemistry</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Tooth Extraction</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Tooth Socket - pathology - surgery</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Wound Healing - physiology</subject.mesh>
<title>Hard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs</title>
<type>Article</type>
<identifier.openurl>http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&amp;issn=0905-7161&amp;volume=21&amp;spage=885&amp;epage=890&amp;date=2010&amp;atitle=Hard+tissue+formation+adjacent+to+implants+of+various+size+and+configuration+immediately+placed+into+extraction+sockets:+an+experimental+study+in+dogs</identifier.openurl>
<description.nature>Link_to_subscribed_fulltext</description.nature>
<identifier.doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.x</identifier.doi>
<identifier.pmid>20491839</identifier.pmid>
<identifier.scopus>eid_2-s2.0-77955351268</identifier.scopus>
<identifier.hkuros>182850</identifier.hkuros>
<relation.references>http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955351268&amp;selection=ref&amp;src=s&amp;origin=recordpage</relation.references>
<identifier.volume>21</identifier.volume>
<identifier.issue>9</identifier.issue>
<identifier.spage>885</identifier.spage>
<identifier.epage>890</identifier.epage>
<identifier.isi>WOS:000280630200001</identifier.isi>
<publisher.place>United States</publisher.place>
<identifier.citeulike>7604540</identifier.citeulike>
</item>
Author Affiliations
  1. Università degli Studi di Padova
  2. UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
  3. The University of Hong Kong
  4. Ariminum Odontologica
  5. Universidade de Sao Paulo