Article: Competition law enforcement in the television broadcasting sector in Hong Kong: Past cases and recent controversies

File Download Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
  • Find via
Supplementary

  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleCompetition law enforcement in the television broadcasting sector in Hong Kong: Past cases and recent controversies
AuthorsCheng, TKH
KeywordsCompetition law
Broadcasting
Hong Kong
Issue Date2010
PublisherKluwer Law International.
CitationWorld Competition: law and economics review, 2010, v. 33 n. 2, p. 317-343 [How to Cite?]
AbstractThis article reviews the competition law regime in the television broadcasting sector in Hong Kong. This regime governs one of the only two sectors in Hong Kong subject to competition law enforcement until the government promulgates a cross-sector competition law. The article begins with an overview of the state of competition in the sector, highlighting trends in recent development that are relevant to competition law enforcement. This is followed by an examination of the two main competition provisions in the Broadcasting Ordinance and the guidelines issued by the Broadcasting Authority, the sectoral regulator. It argues that one of the greatest flaws in the provisions is their designation of the downstream market as the relevant market, hence exacerbating the limitations of a sectoral regime. The article continues with a critical review of the existing decisional practices, focusing on the regulator’s treatment of market definition, predatory pricing, and causation. It argues that the regulator has largely failed to apply rigorous analysis to these issues and has adopted an overly stringent standard for causation. It concludes with an analysis of a recent controversy in the sector - the dominant terrestrial broadcaster’s alleged imposition of exclusivity on artists, which prevent these artists from appearing on rival channels.
ISSN1011-4548
DC Field
Value
dc.contributor.authorCheng, TKH
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-31T10:17:51Z
dc.date.available2010-10-31T10:17:51Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractThis article reviews the competition law regime in the television broadcasting sector in Hong Kong. This regime governs one of the only two sectors in Hong Kong subject to competition law enforcement until the government promulgates a cross-sector competition law. The article begins with an overview of the state of competition in the sector, highlighting trends in recent development that are relevant to competition law enforcement. This is followed by an examination of the two main competition provisions in the Broadcasting Ordinance and the guidelines issued by the Broadcasting Authority, the sectoral regulator. It argues that one of the greatest flaws in the provisions is their designation of the downstream market as the relevant market, hence exacerbating the limitations of a sectoral regime. The article continues with a critical review of the existing decisional practices, focusing on the regulator’s treatment of market definition, predatory pricing, and causation. It argues that the regulator has largely failed to apply rigorous analysis to these issues and has adopted an overly stringent standard for causation. It concludes with an analysis of a recent controversy in the sector - the dominant terrestrial broadcaster’s alleged imposition of exclusivity on artists, which prevent these artists from appearing on rival channels.
dc.identifier.citationWorld Competition: law and economics review, 2010, v. 33 n. 2, p. 317-343 [How to Cite?]
dc.identifier.epage343
dc.identifier.hkuros179626
dc.identifier.issn1011-4548
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.openurl
dc.identifier.spage317
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/124171
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherKluwer Law International.
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Competition: law and economics review
dc.subjectCompetition law
dc.subjectBroadcasting
dc.subjectHong Kong
dc.titleCompetition law enforcement in the television broadcasting sector in Hong Kong: Past cases and recent controversies
dc.typeArticle