File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.04.043
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-77953812306
- PMID: 20546840
- WOS: WOS:000279808600009
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Computational studies of interactions between endocrine disrupting chemicals and androgen receptor of different vertebrate species
Title | Computational studies of interactions between endocrine disrupting chemicals and androgen receptor of different vertebrate species | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||||||
Keywords | Androgen receptor Endocrine disrupting chemicals Homology modeling Molecular docking | ||||||||
Issue Date | 2010 | ||||||||
Publisher | Pergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere | ||||||||
Citation | Chemosphere, 2010, v. 80 n. 5, p. 535-541 How to Cite? | ||||||||
Abstract | Homology modeling and molecular docking were used to in silico analyze the interactions between six endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and 11 androgen receptors (ARs) of different vertebrate species. The MODELLER 9V7 program was employed to construct the homology models of AR ligand binding domains (LBDs) from birds, amphibians, bony fishes and cartilaginous fishes. The Surflex-Dock program was applied to calculate and analyze the binding affinities between the six EDCs and AR LBDs. The docking experiment showed that AR LBDs had high affinities with nonyl phenol (NP) and butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), but low affinities with the 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexabromodiphenyl ether (BDE153). The results of cluster analysis suggested that predicted binding affinities were species-specific, which was consistent with the phylogenetic analysis of AR LBDs. The difference of binding affinities could be mainly due to the different hydrogen bonds and the orientation of ligands in the binding pockets. Our results suggest that integrated methods of phylogenetic analysis, homology modeling and molecular docking might be a potential tool to predict the different interactions between contaminants and associated receptors in different trophic levels. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. | ||||||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/124082 | ||||||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 8.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.806 | ||||||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: This research work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50938004), Social Development Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BE2009668) and Shanghai Tongji Gao Tingyao Environmental Science and Technology Development Foundation. | ||||||||
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wu, B | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ford, T | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Gu, JD | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, XX | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Li, AM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, SP | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-10-22T03:51:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-10-22T03:51:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Chemosphere, 2010, v. 80 n. 5, p. 535-541 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0045-6535 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/124082 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Homology modeling and molecular docking were used to in silico analyze the interactions between six endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and 11 androgen receptors (ARs) of different vertebrate species. The MODELLER 9V7 program was employed to construct the homology models of AR ligand binding domains (LBDs) from birds, amphibians, bony fishes and cartilaginous fishes. The Surflex-Dock program was applied to calculate and analyze the binding affinities between the six EDCs and AR LBDs. The docking experiment showed that AR LBDs had high affinities with nonyl phenol (NP) and butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), but low affinities with the 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexabromodiphenyl ether (BDE153). The results of cluster analysis suggested that predicted binding affinities were species-specific, which was consistent with the phylogenetic analysis of AR LBDs. The difference of binding affinities could be mainly due to the different hydrogen bonds and the orientation of ligands in the binding pockets. Our results suggest that integrated methods of phylogenetic analysis, homology modeling and molecular docking might be a potential tool to predict the different interactions between contaminants and associated receptors in different trophic levels. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Pergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Chemosphere | en_HK |
dc.subject | Androgen receptor | en_HK |
dc.subject | Endocrine disrupting chemicals | en_HK |
dc.subject | Homology modeling | en_HK |
dc.subject | Molecular docking | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Amino Acid Sequence | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Amphibians - metabolism | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Endocrine Disruptors - chemistry - metabolism - toxicity | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Receptors, Androgen - chemistry - metabolism | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Vertebrates - metabolism | - |
dc.title | Computational studies of interactions between endocrine disrupting chemicals and androgen receptor of different vertebrate species | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0045-6535&volume=80&issue=5&spage=535&epage=541&date=2010&atitle=Computational+studies+of+interactions+between+endocrine+disrupting+chemicals+and+androgen+receptor+of+different+vertebrate+species | - |
dc.identifier.email | Gu, JD: jdgu@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Gu, JD=rp00701 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.04.043 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20546840 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-77953812306 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 172625 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77953812306&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 80 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 535 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 541 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000279808600009 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wu, B=55120553300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ford, T=26634948200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Gu, JD=7403129601 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zhang, XX=8555121100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Li, AM=24577638500 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cheng, SP=18039405400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 7267284 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0045-6535 | - |