File Download
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Product crises and babyfaces: the face of a company affects consumer judgments
Title | Product crises and babyfaces: the face of a company affects consumer judgments |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | Association for Consumer Research. |
Citation | The Annual North American Conference of the The Association for Consumer Research, Pittsburgh, PA., 22-25 October 2009. In Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Proceedings, 2009, v. 8, p. 176 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Search the web for today’s business news or read the business section of the newspaper and you will likely come across a headline about a company facing a public relations (i.e., PR) crisis. Take the recent headline “Edelman Eats Humble Pie, Unmasked as Force behind Wal-Mart Blog; PR Giant Does Damage Control” in Advertising Age (2006). The accompanying article and photo of Richard Edelman contains an apology by him for a fake blog that his firm created on behalf of Wal-Mart. The question we address is how consumers will respond to Edelman’s public apology for the “error in failing to be transparent about the identity of the two bloggers from the outset.” How will Edelman’s apology impact consumer liking for the Edelman and Wal-Mart brands? We believe that Edelman’s photo in the news article, specifically whether he is perceived to have a “babyface” (large eyes, small nose, high forehead, and small chin) or a mature face will be one of the determinants of their response. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/112111 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gorn, GJ | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Jiang, Y | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Johar, GV | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-26T03:18:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-26T03:18:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | The Annual North American Conference of the The Association for Consumer Research, Pittsburgh, PA., 22-25 October 2009. In Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Proceedings, 2009, v. 8, p. 176 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/112111 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Search the web for today’s business news or read the business section of the newspaper and you will likely come across a headline about a company facing a public relations (i.e., PR) crisis. Take the recent headline “Edelman Eats Humble Pie, Unmasked as Force behind Wal-Mart Blog; PR Giant Does Damage Control” in Advertising Age (2006). The accompanying article and photo of Richard Edelman contains an apology by him for a fake blog that his firm created on behalf of Wal-Mart. The question we address is how consumers will respond to Edelman’s public apology for the “error in failing to be transparent about the identity of the two bloggers from the outset.” How will Edelman’s apology impact consumer liking for the Edelman and Wal-Mart brands? We believe that Edelman’s photo in the news article, specifically whether he is perceived to have a “babyface” (large eyes, small nose, high forehead, and small chin) or a mature face will be one of the determinants of their response. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Association for Consumer Research. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Proceedings | en_HK |
dc.title | Product crises and babyfaces: the face of a company affects consumer judgments | en_HK |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Gorn, GJ: gorn@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Johar, GV: gvj1@columbia.edu | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 164986 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 165114 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 8 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 176 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 176 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.description.other | The Annual North American Conference of the The Association for Consumer Research, Pittsburgh, PA., 22-25 October 2009. In Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Proceedings, 2009, v. 8, p. 176 | - |