File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial

TitleExternal drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial
Authors
Issue Date2007
PublisherAmerican Surgical Association
Citation
The 127th Annual Meeting of American Surgical Association, Colorado Springs, CO, 26-28 April 2007 How to Cite?
AbstractOBJECTIVE(S): Pancreatic fistula is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent has been shown to reduce pancreatic fistula rate of pancreaticojejunostomy in a few retrospective or prospective nonrandomized studies, but no randomized controlled trial has been reported thus far. This single-center prospective randomized trial compared the results of pancreaticoduodenectomy with external drainage stent versus no stent for pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. METHODS: A total of 120 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with end-to-side pancreaticojejunal anastomosis were randomized to have either an external stent inserted across the anastomosis to drain the pancreatic duct (n=60) or no stent (n=60). Duct-to-mucosa anastomosis was performed in all cases. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in demographic data, underlying pathologies, pancreatic consistency and duct diameter. Stented group had a significantly lower pancreatic fistula rate compared with nonstented group (6.7% vs. 20%, p=0.032). Radiological or surgical intervention for pancreatic fistula was required in 1 patient in the stented group and 4 patients in the nonstented group. There were no significant differences in overall morbidity (31.7% vs. 38.3%, p=0.444) and hospital mortality (1.7% vs. 5%, p=0.309). Two patients in the nonstented group and none in the stented group died of pancreatic fistula. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the stented group (mean 17 vs. 23 days, p=0.039). On multivariate analysis, pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm and no stenting were significant risk factors of pancreatic fistula. CONCLUSIONS: External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent reduced leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/108538

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPoon, RTPen_HK
dc.contributor.authorFan, STen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLo, CMen_HK
dc.contributor.authorNg, KKCen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYuen, WKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Cen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWong, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-26T00:43:49Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-26T00:43:49Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_HK
dc.identifier.citationThe 127th Annual Meeting of American Surgical Association, Colorado Springs, CO, 26-28 April 2007-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/108538-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE(S): Pancreatic fistula is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent has been shown to reduce pancreatic fistula rate of pancreaticojejunostomy in a few retrospective or prospective nonrandomized studies, but no randomized controlled trial has been reported thus far. This single-center prospective randomized trial compared the results of pancreaticoduodenectomy with external drainage stent versus no stent for pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. METHODS: A total of 120 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with end-to-side pancreaticojejunal anastomosis were randomized to have either an external stent inserted across the anastomosis to drain the pancreatic duct (n=60) or no stent (n=60). Duct-to-mucosa anastomosis was performed in all cases. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in demographic data, underlying pathologies, pancreatic consistency and duct diameter. Stented group had a significantly lower pancreatic fistula rate compared with nonstented group (6.7% vs. 20%, p=0.032). Radiological or surgical intervention for pancreatic fistula was required in 1 patient in the stented group and 4 patients in the nonstented group. There were no significant differences in overall morbidity (31.7% vs. 38.3%, p=0.444) and hospital mortality (1.7% vs. 5%, p=0.309). Two patients in the nonstented group and none in the stented group died of pancreatic fistula. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the stented group (mean 17 vs. 23 days, p=0.039). On multivariate analysis, pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm and no stenting were significant risk factors of pancreatic fistula. CONCLUSIONS: External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent reduced leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherAmerican Surgical Association-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Meeting of American Surgical Associationen_HK
dc.titleExternal drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trialen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.emailPoon, RTP: poontp@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailFan, ST: stfan@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailLo, CM: chungmlo@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailNg, KKC: kkcng95@gmail.comen_HK
dc.identifier.emailYeung, C: cyeung@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailWong, J: jwong@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityPoon, RTP=rp00446en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityFan, ST=rp00355en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLo, CM=rp00412en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityWong, J=rp00322en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros133229en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats