File Download
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: A randomized controlled trial of concurrent UFT/Radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy for loco-regionally advanced non-metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Title | A randomized controlled trial of concurrent UFT/Radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy for loco-regionally advanced non-metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2002 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
Citation | The 18th UICC International Cancer Congress, Oslo, Norway, 30 June-5 July 2002. In International Journal of Cancer, 2002, v. 100 n. S13, p. 79, abstract no. O30 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background of the study: There have been many attempts tocombine chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in treatment ofnasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but improvement in tumor con-trol over standard RT was demonstrated only recently by theInternational Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Study and the Head andNeck Intergroup. Methods and material: Patients with newly di-agnosed non-metastatic NPC with Ho’s stage T3, or N2-N3 dis-ease, or any lymph node „d4 cm were recruited. Patients were firstrandomized to receive UFT 200mg 3 times per day during wholecourse of RT or RT only, and they were also further randomizedto receive AC or no AC after RT. AC consisted of alternating PF (cisplatin 100mg/m2 D1 and 5-FU 1g/m2 D1-3) and VBM (vin-cristine 2mg, bleomycin 30mg and methotrexate 250mg/m2, all onD1) for total of 6 cycles. Thus, there were 4 treatment groups: a.RT alone, b. RT with concurrent UFT, c. RT and AC, d. RT withconcurrent UFT and then AC. For the analysis on efficacy ofconcurrent chemoradiation (i.e. no UFT vs. UFT), groups a and cwere compared with groups b and d. For the analysis on efficacyof AC (i.e. no AC vs. AC), groups a and b were compared withgroups c and d. Results: One hundred fifty-seven patients, atmedian follow up of 34 months, were included in this analysis.There was no significant difference in number of patients andprognostic factors between the groups. The 3 years failure-freesurvival (FFS) of the 4 groups were respectively 54.5%, 69.6%,51.1% and 73.3%. Patients on concurrent chemoradiation withUFT fared significantly better than patients on RT only (3 yearsFFS 71.4% vs. 52.9%, p ⫽ 0.019), but there was no significantdifference in 3 years overall survival (83.9% vs. 75.9%, p ⫽ 0.29).There was no significant difference in outcome for patients withand without AC (3 years FFS: 62.9% vs. 61.4%, p ⫽ 0.68).Conclusion: The results will be discussed. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/105606 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.131 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sham, JST | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Kwong, DLW | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Au, GKH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chua, DTT | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-25T22:41:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-25T22:41:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | The 18th UICC International Cancer Congress, Oslo, Norway, 30 June-5 July 2002. In International Journal of Cancer, 2002, v. 100 n. S13, p. 79, abstract no. O30 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0020-7136 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/105606 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background of the study: There have been many attempts tocombine chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in treatment ofnasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but improvement in tumor con-trol over standard RT was demonstrated only recently by theInternational Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Study and the Head andNeck Intergroup. Methods and material: Patients with newly di-agnosed non-metastatic NPC with Ho’s stage T3, or N2-N3 dis-ease, or any lymph node „d4 cm were recruited. Patients were firstrandomized to receive UFT 200mg 3 times per day during wholecourse of RT or RT only, and they were also further randomizedto receive AC or no AC after RT. AC consisted of alternating PF (cisplatin 100mg/m2 D1 and 5-FU 1g/m2 D1-3) and VBM (vin-cristine 2mg, bleomycin 30mg and methotrexate 250mg/m2, all onD1) for total of 6 cycles. Thus, there were 4 treatment groups: a.RT alone, b. RT with concurrent UFT, c. RT and AC, d. RT withconcurrent UFT and then AC. For the analysis on efficacy ofconcurrent chemoradiation (i.e. no UFT vs. UFT), groups a and cwere compared with groups b and d. For the analysis on efficacyof AC (i.e. no AC vs. AC), groups a and b were compared withgroups c and d. Results: One hundred fifty-seven patients, atmedian follow up of 34 months, were included in this analysis.There was no significant difference in number of patients andprognostic factors between the groups. The 3 years failure-freesurvival (FFS) of the 4 groups were respectively 54.5%, 69.6%,51.1% and 73.3%. Patients on concurrent chemoradiation withUFT fared significantly better than patients on RT only (3 yearsFFS 71.4% vs. 52.9%, p ⫽ 0.019), but there was no significantdifference in 3 years overall survival (83.9% vs. 75.9%, p ⫽ 0.29).There was no significant difference in outcome for patients withand without AC (3 years FFS: 62.9% vs. 61.4%, p ⫽ 0.68).Conclusion: The results will be discussed. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Cancer | en_HK |
dc.title | A randomized controlled trial of concurrent UFT/Radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy for loco-regionally advanced non-metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma | en_HK |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Sham, JST: jstsham@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Kwong, DLW: dlwkwong@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Chua, DTT: danielchua@hksh.com | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Kwong, DLW=rp00414 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/ijc.9998 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 82194 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 72356 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 100 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | suppl. 13 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 79, abstract no. O30 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 79, abstract no. O30 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0020-7136 | - |