File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Judicialization and the construction of governance

TitleJudicialization and the construction of governance
Authors
Issue Date1999
Citation
Comparative Political Studies, 1999, v. 32, n. 2, p. 147-184 How to Cite?
AbstractI present a theory of the emergence and evolution of governance, conceived as the process through which the rules systems in place in any social setting are adapted to the needs of those who live under them. The theory is composed of three elements: normative structure, dyadic contracting, and triadic dispute resolution. I demonstrate that a move to triadic dispute resolution leads the triadic dispute resolver to construct, and then to manage over time, specific causal relationships between exchange, conflict, and rules. In this way, political life is judicialized. Under certain conditions, the triad will constitute a crucial mechanism of political change. I then explain judicialization and the dynamics of change in two very different polities: the international trade regime and the French Fifth Republic. The conclusion draws out some of the implications of the theory and data for our understanding of the complex relationship between strategic behavior and social structure.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300147
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.491
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStone Sweet, Alec-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T05:49:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T05:49:09Z-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.citationComparative Political Studies, 1999, v. 32, n. 2, p. 147-184-
dc.identifier.issn0010-4140-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300147-
dc.description.abstractI present a theory of the emergence and evolution of governance, conceived as the process through which the rules systems in place in any social setting are adapted to the needs of those who live under them. The theory is composed of three elements: normative structure, dyadic contracting, and triadic dispute resolution. I demonstrate that a move to triadic dispute resolution leads the triadic dispute resolver to construct, and then to manage over time, specific causal relationships between exchange, conflict, and rules. In this way, political life is judicialized. Under certain conditions, the triad will constitute a crucial mechanism of political change. I then explain judicialization and the dynamics of change in two very different polities: the international trade regime and the French Fifth Republic. The conclusion draws out some of the implications of the theory and data for our understanding of the complex relationship between strategic behavior and social structure.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofComparative Political Studies-
dc.titleJudicialization and the construction of governance-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0010414099032002001-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0033412440-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage147-
dc.identifier.epage184-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000079608300001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats