File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/0010414099032002001
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0033412440
- WOS: WOS:000079608300001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Judicialization and the construction of governance
Title | Judicialization and the construction of governance |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 1999 |
Citation | Comparative Political Studies, 1999, v. 32, n. 2, p. 147-184 How to Cite? |
Abstract | I present a theory of the emergence and evolution of governance, conceived as the process through which the rules systems in place in any social setting are adapted to the needs of those who live under them. The theory is composed of three elements: normative structure, dyadic contracting, and triadic dispute resolution. I demonstrate that a move to triadic dispute resolution leads the triadic dispute resolver to construct, and then to manage over time, specific causal relationships between exchange, conflict, and rules. In this way, political life is judicialized. Under certain conditions, the triad will constitute a crucial mechanism of political change. I then explain judicialization and the dynamics of change in two very different polities: the international trade regime and the French Fifth Republic. The conclusion draws out some of the implications of the theory and data for our understanding of the complex relationship between strategic behavior and social structure. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/300147 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.491 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Stone Sweet, Alec | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-04T05:49:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-04T05:49:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Comparative Political Studies, 1999, v. 32, n. 2, p. 147-184 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0010-4140 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/300147 | - |
dc.description.abstract | I present a theory of the emergence and evolution of governance, conceived as the process through which the rules systems in place in any social setting are adapted to the needs of those who live under them. The theory is composed of three elements: normative structure, dyadic contracting, and triadic dispute resolution. I demonstrate that a move to triadic dispute resolution leads the triadic dispute resolver to construct, and then to manage over time, specific causal relationships between exchange, conflict, and rules. In this way, political life is judicialized. Under certain conditions, the triad will constitute a crucial mechanism of political change. I then explain judicialization and the dynamics of change in two very different polities: the international trade regime and the French Fifth Republic. The conclusion draws out some of the implications of the theory and data for our understanding of the complex relationship between strategic behavior and social structure. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Comparative Political Studies | - |
dc.title | Judicialization and the construction of governance | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0010414099032002001 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0033412440 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 32 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 147 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 184 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000079608300001 | - |