File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Ticagrelor reduced risk of infection compared with clopidogrel: a meta-analysis

TitleTicagrelor reduced risk of infection compared with clopidogrel: a meta-analysis
Authors
Issue Date2020
PublisherHong Kong Academy of Medicine Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hkmj.org/
Citation
The 25th Annual Medical Research Conference, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, 18 January 2020. In Hong Kong Medical Journal, 2020, v. 26 n. 1, Suppl. 1, p. 34, abstract no. 56 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: Ticagrelor has antibacterial activity in vitro.1 In the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial, ticagrelor reduced the incidence of pneumonia and improved lung function. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate if ticagrelor reduces the risk of infections. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov for randomised controlled trials comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel that have reported the incidence of infection. The primary outcome was pneumonia. Secondary outcomes were upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), urinary tract infection (UTI), and sepsis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined with random-effects model in RevMan version 5.3. Results: Out of 5231 citations, 13 trials with altogether 90 679 patients were included. Ticagrelor was associated with a lower risk of pneumonia (OR=0.79, 95% CI=0.66-0.95) compared with clopidogrel, but no statistically significant difference was observed for URTI (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.33-1.43), UTI (OR=1.06, 95% CI=0.75-1.49), or sepsis (OR=0.79, 95% CI=0.52-1.21). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis provides further evidence that ticagrelor reduces the risk of pneumonia, when compared with clopidogrel. Our results did not show a reduction in URTI, UTI, or sepsis. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of ticagrelor on infections. Reference: 1. Lancellotti P, Musumeci L, Jacques N, et al. Antibacterial activity of ticagrelor in conventional antiplatelet dosages against antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. JAMA Cardiol 2019;4:596-9.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/281733
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.256
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.357

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, HL-
dc.contributor.authorTsoi, MF-
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Q-
dc.contributor.authorFei, T-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, BMY-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-22T04:18:53Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-22T04:18:53Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationThe 25th Annual Medical Research Conference, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, 18 January 2020. In Hong Kong Medical Journal, 2020, v. 26 n. 1, Suppl. 1, p. 34, abstract no. 56-
dc.identifier.issn1024-2708-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/281733-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Ticagrelor has antibacterial activity in vitro.1 In the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial, ticagrelor reduced the incidence of pneumonia and improved lung function. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate if ticagrelor reduces the risk of infections. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov for randomised controlled trials comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel that have reported the incidence of infection. The primary outcome was pneumonia. Secondary outcomes were upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), urinary tract infection (UTI), and sepsis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined with random-effects model in RevMan version 5.3. Results: Out of 5231 citations, 13 trials with altogether 90 679 patients were included. Ticagrelor was associated with a lower risk of pneumonia (OR=0.79, 95% CI=0.66-0.95) compared with clopidogrel, but no statistically significant difference was observed for URTI (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.33-1.43), UTI (OR=1.06, 95% CI=0.75-1.49), or sepsis (OR=0.79, 95% CI=0.52-1.21). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis provides further evidence that ticagrelor reduces the risk of pneumonia, when compared with clopidogrel. Our results did not show a reduction in URTI, UTI, or sepsis. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of ticagrelor on infections. Reference: 1. Lancellotti P, Musumeci L, Jacques N, et al. Antibacterial activity of ticagrelor in conventional antiplatelet dosages against antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. JAMA Cardiol 2019;4:596-9.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherHong Kong Academy of Medicine Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hkmj.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Medical Journal-
dc.relation.ispartof25th Medical Research Conference-
dc.rightsHong Kong Medical Journal. Copyright © Hong Kong Academy of Medicine Press.-
dc.titleTicagrelor reduced risk of infection compared with clopidogrel: a meta-analysis-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailTsoi, MF: smftsoi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailFeng, Q: qifeng@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, BMY: mycheung@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, BMY=rp01321-
dc.identifier.hkuros309421-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue1, Suppl. 1-
dc.identifier.spage34, abstract no. 56-
dc.identifier.epage34, abstract no. 56-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-
dc.identifier.issnl1024-2708-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats