File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Alternative Facts in Peer-to-Peer Loans? Borrower Misreporting Dynamics and Implications

TitleAlternative Facts in Peer-to-Peer Loans? Borrower Misreporting Dynamics and Implications
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherFinancial Management Association .
Citation
2019 Financial Management Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA, 23-26 October 2019 How to Cite?
AbstractI study the implications and determinants of borrower misreporting in peer-to-peer (P2P) loans for credit card debt repayment and consolidation. I identify potential misreporting based on three behavior-based indicators: consistency of loan amount with outstanding credit balance, roundness of reported income, and roundness of chosen loan amount. A Misreporting Index constructed from these indicators has significant predictive power over the likelihood of default, and the additional default risk does not get compensated in the form of higher interest. Borrower misreporting is more prevalent in areas with lower social capital and among borrowers whose professions are considered less honest. Misreporting also increases notably in the period following the Trump inauguration, and the increase is larger among low-income and low-credit-grade borrowers.
DescriptionSession 070 - Finance & the Internet
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278789

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPURSIAINEN, VP-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T02:14:05Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-21T02:14:05Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citation2019 Financial Management Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA, 23-26 October 2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278789-
dc.descriptionSession 070 - Finance & the Internet-
dc.description.abstractI study the implications and determinants of borrower misreporting in peer-to-peer (P2P) loans for credit card debt repayment and consolidation. I identify potential misreporting based on three behavior-based indicators: consistency of loan amount with outstanding credit balance, roundness of reported income, and roundness of chosen loan amount. A Misreporting Index constructed from these indicators has significant predictive power over the likelihood of default, and the additional default risk does not get compensated in the form of higher interest. Borrower misreporting is more prevalent in areas with lower social capital and among borrowers whose professions are considered less honest. Misreporting also increases notably in the period following the Trump inauguration, and the increase is larger among low-income and low-credit-grade borrowers.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFinancial Management Association . -
dc.relation.ispartofFinancial Management Association Annual Meeting, 2019-
dc.titleAlternative Facts in Peer-to-Peer Loans? Borrower Misreporting Dynamics and Implications-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.hkuros307555-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats