File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1068/p7338
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84871533787
- PMID: 23409377
- WOS: WOS:000313227900014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Whatever happened to object-centered representations?
Title | Whatever happened to object-centered representations? |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Object recognition Mental rotation Object perception Shape perception Shape constancy |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Citation | Perception, 2012, v. 41, n. 9, p. 1153-1162 How to Cite? |
Abstract | David Marr's approach to the study of vision has been tremendously influential. However, the approach proposes the goal of computing invariant shape descriptions from imagebased information, a task that appears implausible, given the tremendous variation that can occur between images displaying a single object. Theorists in the field of three-dimensional object recognition have rejected the approach of computing object-centered representations, and instead propose representations of objects from the perspective of a viewer. If object-centered descriptions of objects exist in the brain, they are more likely to underlie motor interaction with objects rather than visual object understanding. © 2012 a Pion publication. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244007 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.584 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hayward, William G. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-31T02:29:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-31T02:29:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Perception, 2012, v. 41, n. 9, p. 1153-1162 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0301-0066 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244007 | - |
dc.description.abstract | David Marr's approach to the study of vision has been tremendously influential. However, the approach proposes the goal of computing invariant shape descriptions from imagebased information, a task that appears implausible, given the tremendous variation that can occur between images displaying a single object. Theorists in the field of three-dimensional object recognition have rejected the approach of computing object-centered representations, and instead propose representations of objects from the perspective of a viewer. If object-centered descriptions of objects exist in the brain, they are more likely to underlie motor interaction with objects rather than visual object understanding. © 2012 a Pion publication. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Perception | - |
dc.subject | Object recognition | - |
dc.subject | Mental rotation | - |
dc.subject | Object perception | - |
dc.subject | Shape perception | - |
dc.subject | Shape constancy | - |
dc.title | Whatever happened to object-centered representations? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1068/p7338 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 23409377 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84871533787 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 217081 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 41 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1153 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1162 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000313227900014 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0301-0066 | - |