File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/ajcl/avx040
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85101079854
- WOS: WOS:000423078800006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Piercing the Veil of Arbitration Reform in China: Promises, Pitfalls, Patterns, Prognoses and Prospects
Title | Piercing the Veil of Arbitration Reform in China: Promises, Pitfalls, Patterns, Prognoses and Prospects |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2017 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/issue |
Citation | American Journal of Comparative Law, 2017, v. 65 n. 4, p. 799-840 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The promulgation of the China Arbitration Law in 1994 largely reformed and gave shape to the modern Chinese arbitration regulatory framework. However, since then, there has been little legislative improvement in meeting the changing needs. Instead, judicial efforts by China’s Supreme People’s Court and institutional initiatives by Chinese arbitration commissions have further refined and internationalized the Chinese arbitration system. Recent years have witnessed many changes in the Chinese arbitration landscape, particularly the formation, expansion, and complication of the Chinese arbitration market. This Article first critically examines the current regulatory framework and special features of the Chinese arbitration system, many of which promised in the China Arbitration Law, and often referred to as 'arbitration with Chinese characteristics.' It then analyzes comprehensively arbitral developments of the past decade in order to pierce the veil of arbitration reform in China, highlighting the pitfalls, patterns, prognoses, and prospects. Finally, this Article identifies the 'essential' and “highly recommended” ingredients in prospective reform proposals and examines the extent to which such proposals can actually transform China into a favorable international arbitration forum. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/229205 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.175 |
SSRN | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gu, W | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-23T14:09:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-23T14:09:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | American Journal of Comparative Law, 2017, v. 65 n. 4, p. 799-840 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0002-919X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/229205 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The promulgation of the China Arbitration Law in 1994 largely reformed and gave shape to the modern Chinese arbitration regulatory framework. However, since then, there has been little legislative improvement in meeting the changing needs. Instead, judicial efforts by China’s Supreme People’s Court and institutional initiatives by Chinese arbitration commissions have further refined and internationalized the Chinese arbitration system. Recent years have witnessed many changes in the Chinese arbitration landscape, particularly the formation, expansion, and complication of the Chinese arbitration market. This Article first critically examines the current regulatory framework and special features of the Chinese arbitration system, many of which promised in the China Arbitration Law, and often referred to as 'arbitration with Chinese characteristics.' It then analyzes comprehensively arbitral developments of the past decade in order to pierce the veil of arbitration reform in China, highlighting the pitfalls, patterns, prognoses, and prospects. Finally, this Article identifies the 'essential' and “highly recommended” ingredients in prospective reform proposals and examines the extent to which such proposals can actually transform China into a favorable international arbitration forum. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/issue | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | American Journal of Comparative Law | - |
dc.rights | This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in American Journal of Comparative Law following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version American Journal of Comparative Law, 2017, v. 65 n. 4, p. 799-840 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/65/4/799/4712222 | - |
dc.title | Piercing the Veil of Arbitration Reform in China: Promises, Pitfalls, Patterns, Prognoses and Prospects | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Gu, W: guweixia@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Gu, W=rp01249 | - |
dc.description.nature | postprint | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/ajcl/avx040 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85101079854 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 260013 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 65 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 799 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 840 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000423078800006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.ssrn | 3183549 | - |
dc.identifier.hkulrp | 2018/035 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0002-919X | - |