File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Piercing the Veil of Arbitration Reform in China: Promises, Pitfalls, Patterns, Prognoses and Prospects

TitlePiercing the Veil of Arbitration Reform in China: Promises, Pitfalls, Patterns, Prognoses and Prospects
Authors
Issue Date2017
PublisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/issue
Citation
American Journal of Comparative Law, 2017, v. 65 n. 4, p. 799-840 How to Cite?
AbstractThe promulgation of the China Arbitration Law in 1994 largely reformed and gave shape to the modern Chinese arbitration regulatory framework. However, since then, there has been little legislative improvement in meeting the changing needs. Instead, judicial efforts by China’s Supreme People’s Court and institutional initiatives by Chinese arbitration commissions have further refined and internationalized the Chinese arbitration system. Recent years have witnessed many changes in the Chinese arbitration landscape, particularly the formation, expansion, and complication of the Chinese arbitration market. This Article first critically examines the current regulatory framework and special features of the Chinese arbitration system, many of which promised in the China Arbitration Law, and often referred to as 'arbitration with Chinese characteristics.' It then analyzes comprehensively arbitral developments of the past decade in order to pierce the veil of arbitration reform in China, highlighting the pitfalls, patterns, prognoses, and prospects. Finally, this Article identifies the 'essential' and “highly recommended” ingredients in prospective reform proposals and examines the extent to which such proposals can actually transform China into a favorable international arbitration forum.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/229205
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.175
SSRN
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGu, W-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-23T14:09:38Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-23T14:09:38Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Comparative Law, 2017, v. 65 n. 4, p. 799-840-
dc.identifier.issn0002-919X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/229205-
dc.description.abstractThe promulgation of the China Arbitration Law in 1994 largely reformed and gave shape to the modern Chinese arbitration regulatory framework. However, since then, there has been little legislative improvement in meeting the changing needs. Instead, judicial efforts by China’s Supreme People’s Court and institutional initiatives by Chinese arbitration commissions have further refined and internationalized the Chinese arbitration system. Recent years have witnessed many changes in the Chinese arbitration landscape, particularly the formation, expansion, and complication of the Chinese arbitration market. This Article first critically examines the current regulatory framework and special features of the Chinese arbitration system, many of which promised in the China Arbitration Law, and often referred to as 'arbitration with Chinese characteristics.' It then analyzes comprehensively arbitral developments of the past decade in order to pierce the veil of arbitration reform in China, highlighting the pitfalls, patterns, prognoses, and prospects. Finally, this Article identifies the 'essential' and “highly recommended” ingredients in prospective reform proposals and examines the extent to which such proposals can actually transform China into a favorable international arbitration forum.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/issue-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Comparative Law-
dc.rightsThis is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in American Journal of Comparative Law following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version American Journal of Comparative Law, 2017, v. 65 n. 4, p. 799-840 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/65/4/799/4712222-
dc.titlePiercing the Veil of Arbitration Reform in China: Promises, Pitfalls, Patterns, Prognoses and Prospects-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailGu, W: guweixia@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityGu, W=rp01249-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ajcl/avx040-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85101079854-
dc.identifier.hkuros260013-
dc.identifier.volume65-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage799-
dc.identifier.epage840-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000423078800006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.ssrn3183549-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2018/035-
dc.identifier.issnl0002-919X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats