File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/adj.12169
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84901483042
- PMID: 24861394
- WOS: WOS:000339717300009
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effect of dentine conditioning on adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer adhesives
Title | Effect of dentine conditioning on adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer adhesives |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | acid etch bond test dentine bonding polyacrylic acid Resin-modified glass ionomer cement |
Issue Date | 2014 |
Citation | Australian Dental Journal, 2014, v. 59 n. 2, p. 193-200 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the use of phosphoric acid as a surface treatment compared to traditional conditioning agents to dentine bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) adhesives. Methods: Forty human molars were utilized in microtensile bond strength testing, while another 16 were used for evaluation of the bonded interface with scanning electron microscopy. Three RMGIC adhesives were evaluated: Fuji Bond LC (GC Corp); Riva Bond LC (SDI Ltd); and Ketac N100 (3M-ESPE). Surface treatments were 37% phosphoric acid (5 s) or 25-30% polyacrylic acid (PAA) (10 s), or the manufacturer's method - Fuji Bond LC: Cavity Conditioner (20% PAA + 3% AlCl 3 10 s) or Ketac N100 primer: Ketac Nano priming agent (15 s). Teeth were finished with 600-grit SiC paper, surfaces treated and bonded with RMGIC adhesive and stored in distilled water for 24 h then subjected to microtensile bond strength testing. Results: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed adhesion was affected by the 'type of RMGIC adhesive' and 'method of dentine surface treatment' (p < 0.05). The microtensile bond strength of Ketac N100 primer groups was lower than Fuji Bond LC and Riva Bond LC (p < 0.05). Conclusions: For RMGIC adhesives a brief etch with phosphoric acid does not adversely effect short-term bond strengths, but is no better than traditional conditioning with PAA. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/200433 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hamama, HHHE | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Burrow, MF | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yiu, CKY | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-21T06:45:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-21T06:45:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Australian Dental Journal, 2014, v. 59 n. 2, p. 193-200 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/200433 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the use of phosphoric acid as a surface treatment compared to traditional conditioning agents to dentine bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) adhesives. Methods: Forty human molars were utilized in microtensile bond strength testing, while another 16 were used for evaluation of the bonded interface with scanning electron microscopy. Three RMGIC adhesives were evaluated: Fuji Bond LC (GC Corp); Riva Bond LC (SDI Ltd); and Ketac N100 (3M-ESPE). Surface treatments were 37% phosphoric acid (5 s) or 25-30% polyacrylic acid (PAA) (10 s), or the manufacturer's method - Fuji Bond LC: Cavity Conditioner (20% PAA + 3% AlCl 3 10 s) or Ketac N100 primer: Ketac Nano priming agent (15 s). Teeth were finished with 600-grit SiC paper, surfaces treated and bonded with RMGIC adhesive and stored in distilled water for 24 h then subjected to microtensile bond strength testing. Results: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed adhesion was affected by the 'type of RMGIC adhesive' and 'method of dentine surface treatment' (p < 0.05). The microtensile bond strength of Ketac N100 primer groups was lower than Fuji Bond LC and Riva Bond LC (p < 0.05). Conclusions: For RMGIC adhesives a brief etch with phosphoric acid does not adversely effect short-term bond strengths, but is no better than traditional conditioning with PAA. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Australian Dental Journal | en_US |
dc.subject | acid etch | - |
dc.subject | bond test | - |
dc.subject | dentine bonding | - |
dc.subject | polyacrylic acid | - |
dc.subject | Resin-modified glass ionomer cement | - |
dc.title | Effect of dentine conditioning on adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer adhesives | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Burrow, MF: mfburr58@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Yiu, CKY: ckyyiu@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Burrow, MF=rp01306 | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Yiu, CKY=rp00018 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/adj.12169 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 24861394 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84901483042 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 233794 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 59 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 193 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 200 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000339717300009 | - |