File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Regulatory Regime for Online Dispute Resolution: Current Forms and Future Development

TitleRegulatory Regime for Online Dispute Resolution: Current Forms and Future Development
Authors
Issue Date2020
PublisherEdward Elgar
Citation
Regulatory Regime for Online Dispute Resolution: Current Forms and Future Development. In Moscati, MF; Palmer, M & Roberts, M (Eds.), Comparative Dispute Resolution, p. 424-436. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2020 How to Cite?
AbstractOnline Dispute Resolution (ODR) makes use of modern information technology to facilitate dispute resolution through negotiation, mediation, arbitration and litigation. For a long time, self-regulation is believed to be the guiding principle for the development of ODR forms. Under this regulatory regime, ODR develops rather quickly, but relevant ODR platforms lack sustainability. The only successful example is the domain name dispute resolution regime represented by the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). To ensure healthy and sustainable development of the ODR, it is necessary for the international society to consider the possibility of setting up an appropriate regulatory regime. The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) took the initiative to draft guiding rules for ODR. This Chapter examines the existing forms and processes of ODR, and analyses the necessity of a regulatory regime for ODR, followed by the discussions on the UNCITAL regulatory efforts. By identifying the problems and loopholes in the current regulatory regime, this Chapter puts forward suggestions on how to improve the current situation and push further development of ODR.
DescriptionChapter 29
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/311799
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T09:13:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-01T09:13:21Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationRegulatory Regime for Online Dispute Resolution: Current Forms and Future Development. In Moscati, MF; Palmer, M & Roberts, M (Eds.), Comparative Dispute Resolution, p. 424-436. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2020-
dc.identifier.isbn9781786433022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/311799-
dc.descriptionChapter 29-
dc.description.abstractOnline Dispute Resolution (ODR) makes use of modern information technology to facilitate dispute resolution through negotiation, mediation, arbitration and litigation. For a long time, self-regulation is believed to be the guiding principle for the development of ODR forms. Under this regulatory regime, ODR develops rather quickly, but relevant ODR platforms lack sustainability. The only successful example is the domain name dispute resolution regime represented by the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). To ensure healthy and sustainable development of the ODR, it is necessary for the international society to consider the possibility of setting up an appropriate regulatory regime. The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) took the initiative to draft guiding rules for ODR. This Chapter examines the existing forms and processes of ODR, and analyses the necessity of a regulatory regime for ODR, followed by the discussions on the UNCITAL regulatory efforts. By identifying the problems and loopholes in the current regulatory regime, this Chapter puts forward suggestions on how to improve the current situation and push further development of ODR.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEdward Elgar-
dc.relation.ispartofComparative Dispute Resolution-
dc.titleRegulatory Regime for Online Dispute Resolution: Current Forms and Future Development-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailZhao, Y: zhaoy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityZhao, Y=rp01278-
dc.identifier.doi10.4337/9781786433039.00039-
dc.identifier.hkuros332337-
dc.identifier.spage424-
dc.identifier.epage436-
dc.publisher.placeCheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats