File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparative evaluation of a dual-target real-time RT-PCR assay for COVID-19 diagnosis and assessment of performance in pooled saliva and nasopharyngeal swab samples

TitleComparative evaluation of a dual-target real-time RT-PCR assay for COVID-19 diagnosis and assessment of performance in pooled saliva and nasopharyngeal swab samples
Authors
KeywordsSARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
real-time RT-PCR
diagnostic test evaluation
pooling
Issue Date2021
PublisherTaylor & Francis. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iero20#.VgGYxUaFOnI
Citation
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 2021, v. 21, p. 741-747 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: Sensitive molecular diagnostic assays are essential for COVID-19 diagnosis. We evaluated the Hecin Scientific SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test kit, a dual-target real-time RT-PCR assay targeting the SARS-CoV-2 N and ORF1ab genes. Methods: The Hecin test kit’s diagnostic performance in detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA was compared to the LightMix Modular SARS and Wuhan CoV E-gene kit (TIB Molbiol) and an in-house single-tube nested real-time RT-PCR using 296 clinical specimens, 11 proficiency testing samples, and 30 low-positive deep throat saliva and nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples pooled into negative samples in ratios of 1:5, 1:10, and 1:30. Results: The limit-of-detection of the Hecin test kit was around 500 dC/mL for the N and ORF1ab targets. Sensitivity and specificity of the Hecin test kit were 98.1% (95% CI: 93.4–99.8%) and 100% (98.1–100%), respectively, when measured against the reference method. The Hecin test kit showed fair sensitivity (80%) in low-positive NPS samples pooled in ratios of 1:5 and 1:10. Its performance in pooled samples could be dramatically improved by adjusting the assay Ct cutoff. Conclusion: The Hecin test kit enables sensitive and specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples and pooled samples.
DescriptionBronze open access
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304683
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.670
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.482
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYip, CCY-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, KH-
dc.contributor.authorNg, ACK-
dc.contributor.authorChan, KH-
dc.contributor.authorTo, KKW-
dc.contributor.authorChan, JFW-
dc.contributor.authorHung, IFN-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, CCV-
dc.contributor.authorSridhar, S-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-05T02:33:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-05T02:33:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationExpert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 2021, v. 21, p. 741-747-
dc.identifier.issn1473-7159-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304683-
dc.descriptionBronze open access-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Sensitive molecular diagnostic assays are essential for COVID-19 diagnosis. We evaluated the Hecin Scientific SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test kit, a dual-target real-time RT-PCR assay targeting the SARS-CoV-2 N and ORF1ab genes. Methods: The Hecin test kit’s diagnostic performance in detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA was compared to the LightMix Modular SARS and Wuhan CoV E-gene kit (TIB Molbiol) and an in-house single-tube nested real-time RT-PCR using 296 clinical specimens, 11 proficiency testing samples, and 30 low-positive deep throat saliva and nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples pooled into negative samples in ratios of 1:5, 1:10, and 1:30. Results: The limit-of-detection of the Hecin test kit was around 500 dC/mL for the N and ORF1ab targets. Sensitivity and specificity of the Hecin test kit were 98.1% (95% CI: 93.4–99.8%) and 100% (98.1–100%), respectively, when measured against the reference method. The Hecin test kit showed fair sensitivity (80%) in low-positive NPS samples pooled in ratios of 1:5 and 1:10. Its performance in pooled samples could be dramatically improved by adjusting the assay Ct cutoff. Conclusion: The Hecin test kit enables sensitive and specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples and pooled samples.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iero20#.VgGYxUaFOnI-
dc.relation.ispartofExpert Review of Molecular Diagnostics-
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI].-
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjectreal-time RT-PCR-
dc.subjectdiagnostic test evaluation-
dc.subjectpooling-
dc.titleComparative evaluation of a dual-target real-time RT-PCR assay for COVID-19 diagnosis and assessment of performance in pooled saliva and nasopharyngeal swab samples-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailYip, CCY: yipcyril@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLeung, KH: khl17@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, KH: chankh2@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailTo, KKW: kelvinto@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, JFW: jfwchan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailHung, IFN: ivanhung@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailSridhar, S: sid8998@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYip, CCY=rp01721-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, KH=rp01921-
dc.identifier.authorityTo, KKW=rp01384-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, JFW=rp01736-
dc.identifier.authorityHung, IFN=rp00508-
dc.identifier.authoritySridhar, S=rp02249-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14737159.2021.1933445-
dc.identifier.pmid34014785-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC8182820-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85107473840-
dc.identifier.hkuros325981-
dc.identifier.volume21-
dc.identifier.spage741-
dc.identifier.epage747-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000657928500001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats