File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparing the efficacy of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention with cognitive behavioral therapy in patient-caregiver parallel groups for lung cancer patients using a randomized controlled trial

TitleComparing the efficacy of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention with cognitive behavioral therapy in patient-caregiver parallel groups for lung cancer patients using a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Keywordscomparative effectiveness
family
intervention research
lungquality of Life
RCT
Issue Date2020
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wjpo20
Citation
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 2020, v. 38 n. 4, p. 389-405 How to Cite?
AbstractPurposes/objectives: This paper reports the comparative efficacies of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention (I-BMS) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in patient-caregiver parallel groups for Chinese patients with lung cancer. Design: Randomized controlled trial (RCT). Methods: One hundred and fifty-seven patient-caregiver dyads with no marked functional impairment were randomized into one of the two interventions with eight weekly patient-caregiver parallel groups. Assessments were conducted at baseline, within one, eight- and sixteen-weeks post-intervention. Effects of treatment group across time were analyzed by multilevel modeling. Findings: CBT led to greater reduction in emotional vulnerability than I-BMS. I-BMS resulted in greater increase in overall QoL and spiritual self-care, and more reduction in depression than CBT. Patients in both interventions experienced improvement in physical, emotional and spiritual, except social, domains of QoL. Conclusion: I-BMS was more efficacious for diverse domains of QoL, and CBT was more effective for emotional well-being, despite the relatively small between-group effect sizes. Implications for psychosocial providers/policy: (1) With the expanding repertoire of psychosocial interventions for families facing lung cancer, it has become imperative to investigate the comparative efficacies of empirically supported and culturally adapted interventions. (2) Our findings show that I-BMS was more effective for diverse domains of QoL, while CBT was more efficacious with emotional well-being, although both interventions led to significant improvements in physical, emotional and spiritual domains of patient QoL. (3) Patient-caregiver parallel groups have been shown to be effective for enhancing QoL of Chinese lung cancer patients. (4) Care professionals are encouraged to dispense interventions based on the idiosyncratic needs and preferences of the patients to maximize the treatment effects.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290137
ISSN
2019 Impact Factor: 1.238
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.776

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLau, BHP-
dc.contributor.authorChow, AYM-
dc.contributor.authorNg, TK-
dc.contributor.authorFung, YL-
dc.contributor.authorLam, TC-
dc.contributor.authorSo, TH-
dc.contributor.authorChan, JSM-
dc.contributor.authorChan, CHY-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, J-
dc.contributor.authorTam, MYJ-
dc.contributor.authorTsang, MW-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, NSY-
dc.contributor.authorLim, PFM-
dc.contributor.authorChow, SF-
dc.contributor.authorChan, CLW-
dc.contributor.authorWong, DFK-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T08:22:36Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-22T08:22:36Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Psychosocial Oncology, 2020, v. 38 n. 4, p. 389-405-
dc.identifier.issn0734-7332-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290137-
dc.description.abstractPurposes/objectives: This paper reports the comparative efficacies of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention (I-BMS) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in patient-caregiver parallel groups for Chinese patients with lung cancer. Design: Randomized controlled trial (RCT). Methods: One hundred and fifty-seven patient-caregiver dyads with no marked functional impairment were randomized into one of the two interventions with eight weekly patient-caregiver parallel groups. Assessments were conducted at baseline, within one, eight- and sixteen-weeks post-intervention. Effects of treatment group across time were analyzed by multilevel modeling. Findings: CBT led to greater reduction in emotional vulnerability than I-BMS. I-BMS resulted in greater increase in overall QoL and spiritual self-care, and more reduction in depression than CBT. Patients in both interventions experienced improvement in physical, emotional and spiritual, except social, domains of QoL. Conclusion: I-BMS was more efficacious for diverse domains of QoL, and CBT was more effective for emotional well-being, despite the relatively small between-group effect sizes. Implications for psychosocial providers/policy: (1) With the expanding repertoire of psychosocial interventions for families facing lung cancer, it has become imperative to investigate the comparative efficacies of empirically supported and culturally adapted interventions. (2) Our findings show that I-BMS was more effective for diverse domains of QoL, while CBT was more efficacious with emotional well-being, although both interventions led to significant improvements in physical, emotional and spiritual domains of patient QoL. (3) Patient-caregiver parallel groups have been shown to be effective for enhancing QoL of Chinese lung cancer patients. (4) Care professionals are encouraged to dispense interventions based on the idiosyncratic needs and preferences of the patients to maximize the treatment effects.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wjpo20-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Psychosocial Oncology-
dc.rightsPreprint: This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI]. Postprint: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI].-
dc.subjectcomparative effectiveness-
dc.subjectfamily-
dc.subjectintervention research-
dc.subjectlungquality of Life-
dc.subjectRCT-
dc.titleComparing the efficacy of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention with cognitive behavioral therapy in patient-caregiver parallel groups for lung cancer patients using a randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChow, AYM: chowamy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailFung, YL: yl.fung28@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLam, TC: lamtc03@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailSo, TH: sth495@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, CHY: chancelia@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, CLW: cecichan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWong, DFK: dfkwong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChow, AYM=rp00623-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, TC=rp02128-
dc.identifier.authoritySo, TH=rp01981-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, CHY=rp00498-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, CLW=rp00579-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, DFK=rp00593-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/07347332.2020.1722981-
dc.identifier.pmid32146876-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85081361873-
dc.identifier.hkuros316654-
dc.identifier.volume38-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage389-
dc.identifier.epage405-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats