File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: Teaching Evidence Law in Hong Kong after 1997
Title | Teaching Evidence Law in Hong Kong after 1997 |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Citation | Teaching Evidence Law in Hong Kong after 1997. In Daly, Y; Gans, J & Schwikkard, PJ (Eds.), Teaching Evidence Law: Contemporary Trends and Innovations, Ch 10 (11 pp.). Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2021 How to Cite? |
Abstract | In this chapter, the author discusses his experience of using comparative law materials and incorporating experiences from legal practice to enrich Evidence Law teaching. As most people now know, the implementation of “one country, two systems” in Hong Kong has not been without its challenges. In the conclusion, the author reflects upon whether the civil unrest of 2019, sparked by a proposed bill enabling ad hoc extradition of Hong Kong residents to Mainland China and other places, has implications for the teaching of Evidence in Hong Kong. Legal academics naturally speak of comparative law with a mind to scholarship, judges with a mind to adjudication, and most apex court judges with a mind to the coherent development of the law. But the author returns to the classroom and pedagogy. Comparative materials are especially useful in shedding light on how the local law might develop in an unsettled area. |
Description | Chapter 10 |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/289349 |
ISBN | |
Series/Report no. | Legal Pedagogy |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Young, SNM | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-22T08:11:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-22T08:11:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Teaching Evidence Law in Hong Kong after 1997. In Daly, Y; Gans, J & Schwikkard, PJ (Eds.), Teaching Evidence Law: Contemporary Trends and Innovations, Ch 10 (11 pp.). Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-0367251390 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/289349 | - |
dc.description | Chapter 10 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this chapter, the author discusses his experience of using comparative law materials and incorporating experiences from legal practice to enrich Evidence Law teaching. As most people now know, the implementation of “one country, two systems” in Hong Kong has not been without its challenges. In the conclusion, the author reflects upon whether the civil unrest of 2019, sparked by a proposed bill enabling ad hoc extradition of Hong Kong residents to Mainland China and other places, has implications for the teaching of Evidence in Hong Kong. Legal academics naturally speak of comparative law with a mind to scholarship, judges with a mind to adjudication, and most apex court judges with a mind to the coherent development of the law. But the author returns to the classroom and pedagogy. Comparative materials are especially useful in shedding light on how the local law might develop in an unsettled area. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Routledge | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Teaching Evidence Law: Contemporary Trends and Innovations | - |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Legal Pedagogy | - |
dc.title | Teaching Evidence Law in Hong Kong after 1997 | - |
dc.type | Book_Chapter | - |
dc.identifier.email | Young, SNM: snmyoung@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Young, SNM=rp01275 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9780429286292-10 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 316495 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York, NY | - |