File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Combining high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules

TitleCombining high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules
Authors
KeywordsInterventional ultrasonography
High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation
Nodular goiter
Ultrasonic imaging
Ablation techniques
Issue Date2021
PublisherSpringer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00330/index.htm
Citation
European Radiology, 2021, v. 31, p. 2384-2391 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective Assessing the 6-month efficacy of combined high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in benign thyroid nodules by comparing it with HIFU ablation alone. Methods: One hundred and eighty-one (55.2%) patients underwent HIFU alone (group I) while 147 (44.8%) underwent concomitant HIFU and PEI treatment for solid or predominantly solid nodules (group II). Intravenous sedation and analgesia were given before the start of treatment. Extent of nodule shrinkage (by volume reduction ratio (VRR)), pain scores (by 0–10 visual analogue scale) during and after ablation, and rate of vocal cord palsy (VCP), skin burn, and nausea/vomiting were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean amount of ethanol injected in group II was 1.3 ± 0.7 ml. The 3- and 6-month VRR were significantly greater in group II (60.41 ± 20.49% vs. 50.13 ± 21.06%, p = 0.001; and 71.08 ± 21.25% vs. 61.37 ± 22.76%, p = 0.001, respectively), and “on-beam” treatment time was significantly shorter in group II (26.55 min vs. 30.26 min, p = 0.001). Group II patients reported significantly lower pain score during treatment (2.24 ± 3.07 vs. 4.97 ± 3.21, p < 0.001) and 2 h after treatment (2.23 ± 2.50 vs. 2.97 ± 4.39, p = 0.044). Rates of VCP, skin burn, and nausea or vomiting were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The combined HIFU and PEI approach with improved administration of intravenous sedation and analgesia was associated with a significantly better 6-month efficacy than HIFU alone in benign thyroid nodules without compromising the safety and comfort of patients.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288059
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 7.034
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.606
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLang, BHH-
dc.contributor.authorWoo, YC-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, KWH-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T12:07:16Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-05T12:07:16Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Radiology, 2021, v. 31, p. 2384-2391-
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288059-
dc.description.abstractObjective Assessing the 6-month efficacy of combined high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in benign thyroid nodules by comparing it with HIFU ablation alone. Methods: One hundred and eighty-one (55.2%) patients underwent HIFU alone (group I) while 147 (44.8%) underwent concomitant HIFU and PEI treatment for solid or predominantly solid nodules (group II). Intravenous sedation and analgesia were given before the start of treatment. Extent of nodule shrinkage (by volume reduction ratio (VRR)), pain scores (by 0–10 visual analogue scale) during and after ablation, and rate of vocal cord palsy (VCP), skin burn, and nausea/vomiting were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean amount of ethanol injected in group II was 1.3 ± 0.7 ml. The 3- and 6-month VRR were significantly greater in group II (60.41 ± 20.49% vs. 50.13 ± 21.06%, p = 0.001; and 71.08 ± 21.25% vs. 61.37 ± 22.76%, p = 0.001, respectively), and “on-beam” treatment time was significantly shorter in group II (26.55 min vs. 30.26 min, p = 0.001). Group II patients reported significantly lower pain score during treatment (2.24 ± 3.07 vs. 4.97 ± 3.21, p < 0.001) and 2 h after treatment (2.23 ± 2.50 vs. 2.97 ± 4.39, p = 0.044). Rates of VCP, skin burn, and nausea or vomiting were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The combined HIFU and PEI approach with improved administration of intravenous sedation and analgesia was associated with a significantly better 6-month efficacy than HIFU alone in benign thyroid nodules without compromising the safety and comfort of patients.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00330/index.htm-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Radiology-
dc.rightsThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in [insert journal title]. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/[insert DOI]-
dc.subjectInterventional ultrasonography-
dc.subjectHigh-intensity focused ultrasound ablation-
dc.subjectNodular goiter-
dc.subjectUltrasonic imaging-
dc.subjectAblation techniques-
dc.titleCombining high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLang, BHH: Blang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWoo, YC: wooyucho@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChiu, KWH: kwhchiu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLang, BHH=rp01828-
dc.identifier.authorityChiu, KWH=rp02074-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-020-07317-3-
dc.identifier.pmid32974689-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85091427976-
dc.identifier.hkuros315467-
dc.identifier.volume31-
dc.identifier.spage2384-
dc.identifier.epage2391-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000572614000005-
dc.publisher.placeGermany-
dc.identifier.issnl0938-7994-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats