File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Elephants have a nose for quantity

TitleElephants have a nose for quantity
Authors
Keywordscomparative cognition
relative quantity judgment
elephants
elephant cognition
numerosity
Issue Date2019
PublisherNational Academy of Sciences. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pnas.org
Citation
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, v. 116 n. 25, p. 12566-12571 How to Cite?
AbstractAnimals often face situations that require making decisions based on quantity. Many species, including humans, rely on an ability to differentiate between more and less to make judgments about social relationships, territories, and food. Habitat-related choices require animals to decide between areas with greater and lesser quantities of food while also weighing relative risk of danger based on group size and predation risk. Such decisions can have a significant impact on survival for an animal and its social group. Many species have demonstrated a capacity for differentiating between two quantities of food and choosing the greater of the two, but they have done so based on information provided primarily in the visual domain. Using an object-choice task, we demonstrate that elephants are able to discriminate between two distinct quantities using their olfactory sense alone. We presented the elephants with choices between two containers of sunflower seeds. The relationship between the amount of seeds within the two containers was represented by 11 different ratios. Overall, the elephants chose the larger quantity of food by smelling for it. The elephants’ performance was better when the relative difference between the quantities increased and worse when the ratio between the quantities of food increased, but was not affected by the overall quantity of food presented. These results are consistent with the performance of animals tested in the visual domain. This work has implications for the design of future, cross-phylogenetic cognitive comparisons that ought to account for differences in how animals sense their world.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278779
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 12.779
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 5.011
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPlotnik, JM-
dc.contributor.authorBrubaker, DL-
dc.contributor.authorDale, R-
dc.contributor.authorTiller, LN-
dc.contributor.authorMumby, HS-
dc.contributor.authorClayton, NS-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T02:13:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-21T02:13:54Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, v. 116 n. 25, p. 12566-12571-
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278779-
dc.description.abstractAnimals often face situations that require making decisions based on quantity. Many species, including humans, rely on an ability to differentiate between more and less to make judgments about social relationships, territories, and food. Habitat-related choices require animals to decide between areas with greater and lesser quantities of food while also weighing relative risk of danger based on group size and predation risk. Such decisions can have a significant impact on survival for an animal and its social group. Many species have demonstrated a capacity for differentiating between two quantities of food and choosing the greater of the two, but they have done so based on information provided primarily in the visual domain. Using an object-choice task, we demonstrate that elephants are able to discriminate between two distinct quantities using their olfactory sense alone. We presented the elephants with choices between two containers of sunflower seeds. The relationship between the amount of seeds within the two containers was represented by 11 different ratios. Overall, the elephants chose the larger quantity of food by smelling for it. The elephants’ performance was better when the relative difference between the quantities increased and worse when the ratio between the quantities of food increased, but was not affected by the overall quantity of food presented. These results are consistent with the performance of animals tested in the visual domain. This work has implications for the design of future, cross-phylogenetic cognitive comparisons that ought to account for differences in how animals sense their world.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciences. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pnas.org-
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences-
dc.rightsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences.-
dc.subjectcomparative cognition-
dc.subjectrelative quantity judgment-
dc.subjectelephants-
dc.subjectelephant cognition-
dc.subjectnumerosity-
dc.titleElephants have a nose for quantity-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailMumby, HS: hsmumby@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityMumby, HS=rp02538-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.1818284116-
dc.identifier.pmid31160445-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6591706-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85067610210-
dc.identifier.hkuros307939-
dc.identifier.volume116-
dc.identifier.issue25-
dc.identifier.spage12566-
dc.identifier.epage12571-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000471887900068-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0027-8424-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats