File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Fundamental Theory of Biodegradable Metals—Definition, Criteria, and Design

TitleFundamental Theory of Biodegradable Metals—Definition, Criteria, and Design
Authors
Keywordsbiocompatibility
biodegradability
biodegradable metals
classification
definition
Issue Date2019
Citation
Advanced Functional Materials, 2019, v. 29 n. 18, p. article no. 1805402 How to Cite?
AbstractUntil now there has been no fundamental theory applicable for biodegradable metals (BMs). First, this paper optimizes the definition of BMs given in 2014. Second, the dual criteria of biodegradability and biocompatibility are proposed for BMs, and all metallic elements in the periodic table with accessible data are screened on the basis of these criteria. Regarding biodegradability, electrode potential, reactivity series, galvanic series, Pilling–Bedworth ratio, and Pourbaix diagrams are all adopted as parameters to classify the degradable and nondegradable nature of a material, especially in a physiological environment. Considering the biocompatibility at different levels, cellular biocompatibility, tissue biocompatibility, and human/clinical related biocompatibility parameters are put forward to comprehensively evaluate the biosafety of BMs. Third, for the material design of BMs, mechanical properties, chemical properties, physical properties and biological properties should be considered and balanced to guarantee that the degradation behavior of BMs match well with a tissue regeneration/repair procedure as the function of time and spatial location. Besides the selected metallic elements, some nonmetallic elements are selected as suitable alloying elements for BMs. Finally, five classification/research directions for future BMs are proposed: biodegradable pure metals, crystalline alloys, bulk metallic glasses, high entropy alloys, and metal matrix composites.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278238
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 19.924
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 6.069
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLIU, Y-
dc.contributor.authorZHENG, Y-
dc.contributor.authorCHEN, XH-
dc.contributor.authorYANG, JA-
dc.contributor.authorPAN, H-
dc.contributor.authorCHEN, D-
dc.contributor.authorWANG, L-
dc.contributor.authorZHANG, J-
dc.contributor.authorZHU, D-
dc.contributor.authorWU, S-
dc.contributor.authorYeung, KWK-
dc.contributor.authorZENG, RC-
dc.contributor.authorHAN, Y-
dc.contributor.authorGUAN, S-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T08:10:09Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-04T08:10:09Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationAdvanced Functional Materials, 2019, v. 29 n. 18, p. article no. 1805402-
dc.identifier.issn1616-301X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278238-
dc.description.abstractUntil now there has been no fundamental theory applicable for biodegradable metals (BMs). First, this paper optimizes the definition of BMs given in 2014. Second, the dual criteria of biodegradability and biocompatibility are proposed for BMs, and all metallic elements in the periodic table with accessible data are screened on the basis of these criteria. Regarding biodegradability, electrode potential, reactivity series, galvanic series, Pilling–Bedworth ratio, and Pourbaix diagrams are all adopted as parameters to classify the degradable and nondegradable nature of a material, especially in a physiological environment. Considering the biocompatibility at different levels, cellular biocompatibility, tissue biocompatibility, and human/clinical related biocompatibility parameters are put forward to comprehensively evaluate the biosafety of BMs. Third, for the material design of BMs, mechanical properties, chemical properties, physical properties and biological properties should be considered and balanced to guarantee that the degradation behavior of BMs match well with a tissue regeneration/repair procedure as the function of time and spatial location. Besides the selected metallic elements, some nonmetallic elements are selected as suitable alloying elements for BMs. Finally, five classification/research directions for future BMs are proposed: biodegradable pure metals, crystalline alloys, bulk metallic glasses, high entropy alloys, and metal matrix composites.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAdvanced Functional Materials-
dc.subjectbiocompatibility-
dc.subjectbiodegradability-
dc.subjectbiodegradable metals-
dc.subjectclassification-
dc.subjectdefinition-
dc.titleFundamental Theory of Biodegradable Metals—Definition, Criteria, and Design-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailYeung, KWK: wkkyeung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYeung, KWK=rp00309-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/adfm.201805402-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85062358711-
dc.identifier.hkuros307078-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue18-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 1805402-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 1805402-
dc.identifier.eissn1616-3028-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000471330500001-
dc.identifier.issnl1616-301X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats