File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Adjuvant chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis

TitleAdjuvant chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis
Authors
Keywordsadjuvant chemotherapy
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
meta-analysis
oncological outcomes
Issue Date2019
PublisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins: Various Creative Commons. The Journal's web site is located at http://journals.lww.com/md-journal/pages/default.aspx
Citation
Medicine, 2019, v. 98 n. 5, article no. e14013 How to Cite?
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To define the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) by performing a meta-analysis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Oncological benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable ICC remains controversial, high-level evidence in such context is lacking. METHOD: A comprehensive search using Pubmed, EMbase, and Web of Science was performed from inception to October 2018. Studies compared the survival of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone were included. Data were analyzed using random effect model. Quality of each study and presence of publication bias were assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa score (NOS) and funnel plot with Egger test respectively. RESULTS: The present meta-analysis included 15 studies (all were retrospective series) and 5060 patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered either intravenously or intra-arterially in the form of trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE). The average NOS for the included studies was 6.5. Pooled analysis of the included studies demonstrated significant advantage in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (HR 0.66, 0.55-079, P <.001, I-square [I] = 20.8%). After 2 studies were removed for heterogeneity, advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy remained (HR 0.72, 0.62-0.84, P <.001, I = 0%). Funnel plot suggested no significant publication bias (Egger test, 2-tailed P = .203). Subgroup analyses suggested that intravenous route of chemotherapy injection (P <.001) and use of gemcitabine base regimen (P = .004) are associated with improved overall survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve disease-free survival in subgroup analysis (P = .94). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival and should be considered in patients with ICC following curative resection and in particular to patients with advance disease.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/271291
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.817
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.590
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMa, KW-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, TT-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, B-
dc.contributor.authorShe, BWH-
dc.contributor.authorChok, KSH-
dc.contributor.authorChan, ACY-
dc.contributor.authorDai, WC-
dc.contributor.authorLo, CM-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-24T01:07:03Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-24T01:07:03Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationMedicine, 2019, v. 98 n. 5, article no. e14013-
dc.identifier.issn0025-7974-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/271291-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To define the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) by performing a meta-analysis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Oncological benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable ICC remains controversial, high-level evidence in such context is lacking. METHOD: A comprehensive search using Pubmed, EMbase, and Web of Science was performed from inception to October 2018. Studies compared the survival of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone were included. Data were analyzed using random effect model. Quality of each study and presence of publication bias were assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa score (NOS) and funnel plot with Egger test respectively. RESULTS: The present meta-analysis included 15 studies (all were retrospective series) and 5060 patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered either intravenously or intra-arterially in the form of trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE). The average NOS for the included studies was 6.5. Pooled analysis of the included studies demonstrated significant advantage in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (HR 0.66, 0.55-079, P <.001, I-square [I] = 20.8%). After 2 studies were removed for heterogeneity, advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy remained (HR 0.72, 0.62-0.84, P <.001, I = 0%). Funnel plot suggested no significant publication bias (Egger test, 2-tailed P = .203). Subgroup analyses suggested that intravenous route of chemotherapy injection (P <.001) and use of gemcitabine base regimen (P = .004) are associated with improved overall survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve disease-free survival in subgroup analysis (P = .94). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival and should be considered in patients with ICC following curative resection and in particular to patients with advance disease.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins: Various Creative Commons. The Journal's web site is located at http://journals.lww.com/md-journal/pages/default.aspx-
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectadjuvant chemotherapy-
dc.subjectintrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-
dc.subjectmeta-analysis-
dc.subjectoncological outcomes-
dc.titleAdjuvant chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, TT: cheung68@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailShe, BWH: brianshe@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChok, KSH: chok6275@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, ACY: acchan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailDai, WC: daiwc@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLo, CM: chungmlo@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, TT=rp02129-
dc.identifier.authorityChok, KSH=rp02110-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, ACY=rp00310-
dc.identifier.authorityLo, CM=rp00412-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MD.0000000000014013-
dc.identifier.pmid30702559-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6380775-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85060955340-
dc.identifier.hkuros297972-
dc.identifier.volume98-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e14013-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e14013-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000462392900008-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0025-7974-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats