File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150533
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84961130265
- PMID: 26938085
- WOS: WOS:000371735200104
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: How big is it really? Assessing the efficacy of indirect estimates of body size in Asian elephants
Title | How big is it really? Assessing the efficacy of indirect estimates of body size in Asian elephants |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2016 |
Citation | PLoS ONE, 2016, v. 11, n. 3, article no. e0150533, p. 1-19 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2016 Chapman et al.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Information on an organism's body size is pivotal in understanding its life history and fitne, as well as helping inform conservation measures. However, for many species, particularly large-bodied wild animals, taking accurate body size measurements can be a challenge. Various means to estimate body size have been employed, from more direct methods such as using photogrammetry to obtain height or length measurements, to indirect prediction of weight using other body morphometrics or even the size of dung boli. It is often unclear how accurate these measures are because they cannot be compared to objective measures. Here, we investigate how well existing estimation equations predict the actual body weight of Asian elephants Elephas maximus, using body measurements (height, chest girth, length, foot circumference and neck circumference) taken directly from a large population of semicaptive animals in Myanmar (n = 404). We then define new and better fitting formulas to predict body weight in Myanmar elephants from these readily available measures. We also investigate whether the important parameters height and chest girth can be estimated from photographs (n = 151). Our results show considerable variation in the ability of existing estimation equations to predict weight, and that the equations proposed in this paper predict weight better in almost all circumstances. We also find that measurements from standardised photographs reflect body height and chest girth after applying minor adjustments. Our results have implications for size estimation of large wild animals in the field, as well as for management in captive settings. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/269742 |
ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 3.752 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.990 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chapman, Simon N. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mumby, Hannah S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Crawley, Jennie A.H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mar, Khyne U. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Htut, Win | - |
dc.contributor.author | Soe, Aung Thura | - |
dc.contributor.author | Aung, Htoo Htoo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lummaa, Virpi | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-30T01:49:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-30T01:49:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | PLoS ONE, 2016, v. 11, n. 3, article no. e0150533, p. 1-19 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/269742 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2016 Chapman et al.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Information on an organism's body size is pivotal in understanding its life history and fitne, as well as helping inform conservation measures. However, for many species, particularly large-bodied wild animals, taking accurate body size measurements can be a challenge. Various means to estimate body size have been employed, from more direct methods such as using photogrammetry to obtain height or length measurements, to indirect prediction of weight using other body morphometrics or even the size of dung boli. It is often unclear how accurate these measures are because they cannot be compared to objective measures. Here, we investigate how well existing estimation equations predict the actual body weight of Asian elephants Elephas maximus, using body measurements (height, chest girth, length, foot circumference and neck circumference) taken directly from a large population of semicaptive animals in Myanmar (n = 404). We then define new and better fitting formulas to predict body weight in Myanmar elephants from these readily available measures. We also investigate whether the important parameters height and chest girth can be estimated from photographs (n = 151). Our results show considerable variation in the ability of existing estimation equations to predict weight, and that the equations proposed in this paper predict weight better in almost all circumstances. We also find that measurements from standardised photographs reflect body height and chest girth after applying minor adjustments. Our results have implications for size estimation of large wild animals in the field, as well as for management in captive settings. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | PLoS ONE | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.title | How big is it really? Assessing the efficacy of indirect estimates of body size in Asian elephants | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0150533 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 26938085 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84961130265 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. e0150533, p. 1 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. e0150533, p. 19 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000371735200104 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1932-6203 | - |