File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Impacts of federally funded state obesity programs on adult obesity prevalence in the united states, 1998-2010

TitleImpacts of federally funded state obesity programs on adult obesity prevalence in the united states, 1998-2010
Authors
KeywordsObesity
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Quasi-experimental analysis
Issue Date2018
Citation
Public Health Reports, 2018, v. 133, n. 2, p. 169-176 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2018, Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health All rights reserved. Objectives: From 2000 to 2010, the Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity (DNPAO) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded 37 state health departments to address the obesity epidemic in their states through various interventions. The objective of this study was to investigate the overall impacts of CDC-DNPAO statewide intervention programs on adult obesity prevalence in the United States. Methods: We used a set of an individual-level, interrupted time-series regression and a quasi-experimental analysis to evaluate the overall effect of CDC-DNPAO intervention programs before (1998-1999) and after (2010) their implementation by using data from CDC’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Results: States that implemented the CDC-DNPAO program had a 2.4% to 3.8% reduction in the odds of obesity during 2000-2010 compared with states without the program. The effect of the CDC-DNPAO program varied by length of program implementation. A quasi-experimental analysis found that states with longer program implementation did not necessarily have lower odds of obesity than states with shorter program implementation. Conclusions: Statewide obesity interventions can contribute to reduced odds of obesity in the United States. Future research should evaluate the CDC-DNPAO programs in relation to their goals, objectives, and other environmental obesity risk factors to inform future interventions.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/265734
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.117
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.202
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Keumseok-
dc.contributor.authorGrady, Sue C.-
dc.contributor.authorVojnovic, Igor-
dc.contributor.authorDarden, Joe T.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-03T01:21:32Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-03T01:21:32Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationPublic Health Reports, 2018, v. 133, n. 2, p. 169-176-
dc.identifier.issn0033-3549-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/265734-
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health All rights reserved. Objectives: From 2000 to 2010, the Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity (DNPAO) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded 37 state health departments to address the obesity epidemic in their states through various interventions. The objective of this study was to investigate the overall impacts of CDC-DNPAO statewide intervention programs on adult obesity prevalence in the United States. Methods: We used a set of an individual-level, interrupted time-series regression and a quasi-experimental analysis to evaluate the overall effect of CDC-DNPAO intervention programs before (1998-1999) and after (2010) their implementation by using data from CDC’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Results: States that implemented the CDC-DNPAO program had a 2.4% to 3.8% reduction in the odds of obesity during 2000-2010 compared with states without the program. The effect of the CDC-DNPAO program varied by length of program implementation. A quasi-experimental analysis found that states with longer program implementation did not necessarily have lower odds of obesity than states with shorter program implementation. Conclusions: Statewide obesity interventions can contribute to reduced odds of obesity in the United States. Future research should evaluate the CDC-DNPAO programs in relation to their goals, objectives, and other environmental obesity risk factors to inform future interventions.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Health Reports-
dc.subjectObesity-
dc.subjectCenters for Disease Control and Prevention-
dc.subjectQuasi-experimental analysis-
dc.titleImpacts of federally funded state obesity programs on adult obesity prevalence in the united states, 1998-2010-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0033354917751128-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85041895700-
dc.identifier.hkuros304093-
dc.identifier.volume133-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage169-
dc.identifier.epage176-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-2877-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000429921600008-
dc.identifier.issnl0033-3549-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats