File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Does density of green infrastructure predict preference?

TitleDoes density of green infrastructure predict preference?
Authors
Issue Date2018
Citation
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018 How to Cite?
AbstractGreen Infrastructure (GI) refers to the natural spaces in a city that improve urban ecology and bring social, economic, and environmental benefits to residents and communities. Although we know a good deal about people's preference for urban forests, we know little about how people reaction to other types of GI and even less about how varying levels of vegetation density influence preference. Without this knowledge, planners and designers risk creating landscapes that people experience as insufficiently restorative.To understand people's preference for different types and vegetation density levels of GI, we conducted three GI preference surveys and utilized a new technology called Brown Dog's Green Index Extractor to calculate vegetation density. We found that, overall, tree density and understory vegetation density are positively associated with preference in a power-curve relationship. The nature of the relationship between bioretention density and preference remains unclear, even though it is significant and positive.The findings presented here expand our knowledge of landscape preference to the emerging field of GI. Designers and planners can use these results to create preferred landscapes that manage stormwater that also promote human well-being. Future studies might explore the relationship between GI density and preference further by investigating other aspects of GI such as planting designs and maintenance and the relationships between GI's vegetation density and various health and well-being indicators.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/261095

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuppakittpaisarn, P-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, B-
dc.contributor.authorSlavenas, M-
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, W-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-14T08:52:25Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-14T08:52:25Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationUrban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/261095-
dc.description.abstractGreen Infrastructure (GI) refers to the natural spaces in a city that improve urban ecology and bring social, economic, and environmental benefits to residents and communities. Although we know a good deal about people's preference for urban forests, we know little about how people reaction to other types of GI and even less about how varying levels of vegetation density influence preference. Without this knowledge, planners and designers risk creating landscapes that people experience as insufficiently restorative.To understand people's preference for different types and vegetation density levels of GI, we conducted three GI preference surveys and utilized a new technology called Brown Dog's Green Index Extractor to calculate vegetation density. We found that, overall, tree density and understory vegetation density are positively associated with preference in a power-curve relationship. The nature of the relationship between bioretention density and preference remains unclear, even though it is significant and positive.The findings presented here expand our knowledge of landscape preference to the emerging field of GI. Designers and planners can use these results to create preferred landscapes that manage stormwater that also promote human well-being. Future studies might explore the relationship between GI density and preference further by investigating other aspects of GI such as planting designs and maintenance and the relationships between GI's vegetation density and various health and well-being indicators.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofUrban Forestry & Urban Greening-
dc.titleDoes density of green infrastructure predict preference?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailJiang, B: jiangbin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityJiang, B=rp01942-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.007-
dc.identifier.hkuros289975-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats