File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Nonprofit Policy Advocacy under Authoritarianism

TitleNonprofit Policy Advocacy under Authoritarianism
Authors
Issue Date2017
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
Citation
Public Administration Review, 2017, v. 77 n. 1, p. 103-117 How to Cite?
AbstractDespite the increasing volume and significance of research on nonprofit advocacy, most studies have focused on the phenomenon only in Western countries. This article expands the scope of the literature by examining the advocacy activities of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in authoritarian China. This article focuses on three aspects of advocacy behavior: advocacy investment and use of insider and outsider tactics. Data analyses of an original nationwide survey of 267 environmental NGOs and semistructured interviews with 30 highlight how resource and institutional factors—government funding, government affiliation, foundation funding, and peer collaborations—shape NGO advocacy in China. The findings also suggest ways in which institutional actors may enhance NGOs’ capacity for policy advocacy. © 2016 by The American Society for Public Administration
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/260275
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 8.144
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.721
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, H-
dc.contributor.authorLo, CWH-
dc.contributor.authorTang, SY-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-12T04:04:15Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-12T04:04:15Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationPublic Administration Review, 2017, v. 77 n. 1, p. 103-117-
dc.identifier.issn0033-3352-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/260275-
dc.description.abstractDespite the increasing volume and significance of research on nonprofit advocacy, most studies have focused on the phenomenon only in Western countries. This article expands the scope of the literature by examining the advocacy activities of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in authoritarian China. This article focuses on three aspects of advocacy behavior: advocacy investment and use of insider and outsider tactics. Data analyses of an original nationwide survey of 267 environmental NGOs and semistructured interviews with 30 highlight how resource and institutional factors—government funding, government affiliation, foundation funding, and peer collaborations—shape NGO advocacy in China. The findings also suggest ways in which institutional actors may enhance NGOs’ capacity for policy advocacy. © 2016 by The American Society for Public Administration-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.-
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Administration Review-
dc.rightsPreprint This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article]. Authors are not required to remove preprints posted prior to acceptance of the submitted version. Postprint This is the accepted version of the following article: [full citation], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article].-
dc.titleNonprofit Policy Advocacy under Authoritarianism-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLi, H: lihuipa@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLi, H=rp02425-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/puar.12585-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84971440955-
dc.identifier.volume77-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage103-
dc.identifier.epage117-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000392519200018-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0033-3352-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats