File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/00220389708422494
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0031411128
- WOS: WOS:A1997XQ45400001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: China's collectivisation puzzle: A new resolution
Title | China's collectivisation puzzle: A new resolution |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 1997 |
Citation | Journal of Development Studies, 1997, v. 33, n. 6, p. 741-763 How to Cite? |
Abstract | According to total factor productivity trends in Chinese agriculture, China achieved productivity gains both when collectivising (1954-58) and when decollectivising (1979-84) its agriculture. If the productivity gains from decollectivisation were due mainly to eliminating the incentive problems of collective farms, how the initial collectivisation could also have been associated with gains in productivity presents a major historical puzzle. We suggest as an answer the possibility that agricultural production in China was widely organised on a household basis until 1958, despite the collectivisation of property rights, and that the formation of the agricultural producers' co-operatives reduced the inefficiencies in factor allocation that existed following China's land reform. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/256863 |
ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 2.519 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.960 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kung, James K.S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Putterman, Louis | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-24T08:58:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-24T08:58:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Development Studies, 1997, v. 33, n. 6, p. 741-763 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-0388 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/256863 | - |
dc.description.abstract | According to total factor productivity trends in Chinese agriculture, China achieved productivity gains both when collectivising (1954-58) and when decollectivising (1979-84) its agriculture. If the productivity gains from decollectivisation were due mainly to eliminating the incentive problems of collective farms, how the initial collectivisation could also have been associated with gains in productivity presents a major historical puzzle. We suggest as an answer the possibility that agricultural production in China was widely organised on a household basis until 1958, despite the collectivisation of property rights, and that the formation of the agricultural producers' co-operatives reduced the inefficiencies in factor allocation that existed following China's land reform. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Development Studies | - |
dc.title | China's collectivisation puzzle: A new resolution | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00220389708422494 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0031411128 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 33 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 741 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 763 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:A1997XQ45400001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0022-0388 | - |