File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Is spatial distribution of China’s population excessively unequal? A cross-country comparison

TitleIs spatial distribution of China’s population excessively unequal? A cross-country comparison
Authors
KeywordsC10
O18
R12
R23
Issue Date2017
Citation
Annals of Regional Science, 2017, v. 59, n. 2, p. 453-474 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany. This study explores whether China’s population distribution is excessively biased toward large cities or coastal regions. The test is based on a fixed effects model estimated from a 5-year panel dataset for 101 countries, and two spatial inequality measures are computed from 0. 25 ∘ × 0. 25 ∘ population grids for a parallel cross-country comparison. The results show that the spatial Gini coefficient for China does not deviate from a general trend, while Moran’s I index is biased upward. This suggests that the spatial inequality of China’s population distribution tends to be more obvious at the regional level than at the city level.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251872
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.709
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.722
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNam, Kyung-Min-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T02:21:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-29T02:21:35Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Regional Science, 2017, v. 59, n. 2, p. 453-474-
dc.identifier.issn0570-1864-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251872-
dc.description.abstract© 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany. This study explores whether China’s population distribution is excessively biased toward large cities or coastal regions. The test is based on a fixed effects model estimated from a 5-year panel dataset for 101 countries, and two spatial inequality measures are computed from 0. 25 ∘ × 0. 25 ∘ population grids for a parallel cross-country comparison. The results show that the spatial Gini coefficient for China does not deviate from a general trend, while Moran’s I index is biased upward. This suggests that the spatial inequality of China’s population distribution tends to be more obvious at the regional level than at the city level.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Regional Science-
dc.subjectC10-
dc.subjectO18-
dc.subjectR12-
dc.subjectR23-
dc.titleIs spatial distribution of China’s population excessively unequal? A cross-country comparison-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00168-017-0839-0-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85022218649-
dc.identifier.hkuros274048-
dc.identifier.volume59-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage453-
dc.identifier.epage474-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-0592-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000410114000008-
dc.identifier.issnl0570-1864-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats