File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Effectiveness of Delivering Free Nicotine Replacement Therapy Sample at Outdoor Smoking Hotspots on Quit Attempts: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TitleEffectiveness of Delivering Free Nicotine Replacement Therapy Sample at Outdoor Smoking Hotspots on Quit Attempts: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
Issue Date2017
PublisherSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong.
Citation
The 7th Hong Kong International Nursing Forum, Hong Kong, 18-19 December 2017 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground and Objectives: We have shown that promoting smoking cessation at outdoor smoking hotspots is feasible and efficacious to recruit smokers for further smoking cessation interventions. We examined whether a free 1-week nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) sample would motivate adult smokers, who were recruited at smoking hotspots, to use NRT and quit. Methods: This was a pilot single-blinded, 2-group (1:1) randomized controlled trial on adult smokers recruited at outdoor smoking hotspots from July 2015 to January 2016. We trained university students to recruit smokers and deliver interventions. Smokers who smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day and deemed appropriate for using NRT were individually randomized to receive 1-week free NRT gum or patch, and a brief advice on using NRT (intervention, n=50), or just an advice to purchase on their own or obtain from existing smoking cessation services (control, n=50). The primary outcome was self-reported quit attempts (no smoking for at least 24 hours) in the past 30 days at 1- and 3-month telephone follow-up. Results: The intervention group had a greater rate of using NRT by the first month (38% versus 6%, Crude prevalence ratio (PR) = 6.33, 95% CI 2.00-20.18) and quit attempts than the control group at 1- (14% versus 10%; PR = 1.40, 95% CI 0.47-4.14) and 3-month follow-up (20% versus 8%; PR = 2.50, 95% CI 0.83-7.49). Within the intervention group, use of NRT at 1-month follow-up predicted quit attempts at 3-month follow-up (42% versus 16%, PRadj = 2.61, 95% CI 0.99-6.89). The 7-day point prevalence of abstinence at 6-month follow-up in the two groups was the same (8%). Conclusions: This study has shown proof-of-concept evidence that 1-week free NRT sample could motivate NRT use and quit attempts in the adult smokers. Larger trials with more strategies for long-term NRT use and quitting outcomes are warranted.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251538

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, YTD-
dc.contributor.authorWang, MP-
dc.contributor.authorLi, WHC-
dc.contributor.authorLam, TH-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-01T03:40:52Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-01T03:40:52Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationThe 7th Hong Kong International Nursing Forum, Hong Kong, 18-19 December 2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251538-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: We have shown that promoting smoking cessation at outdoor smoking hotspots is feasible and efficacious to recruit smokers for further smoking cessation interventions. We examined whether a free 1-week nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) sample would motivate adult smokers, who were recruited at smoking hotspots, to use NRT and quit. Methods: This was a pilot single-blinded, 2-group (1:1) randomized controlled trial on adult smokers recruited at outdoor smoking hotspots from July 2015 to January 2016. We trained university students to recruit smokers and deliver interventions. Smokers who smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day and deemed appropriate for using NRT were individually randomized to receive 1-week free NRT gum or patch, and a brief advice on using NRT (intervention, n=50), or just an advice to purchase on their own or obtain from existing smoking cessation services (control, n=50). The primary outcome was self-reported quit attempts (no smoking for at least 24 hours) in the past 30 days at 1- and 3-month telephone follow-up. Results: The intervention group had a greater rate of using NRT by the first month (38% versus 6%, Crude prevalence ratio (PR) = 6.33, 95% CI 2.00-20.18) and quit attempts than the control group at 1- (14% versus 10%; PR = 1.40, 95% CI 0.47-4.14) and 3-month follow-up (20% versus 8%; PR = 2.50, 95% CI 0.83-7.49). Within the intervention group, use of NRT at 1-month follow-up predicted quit attempts at 3-month follow-up (42% versus 16%, PRadj = 2.61, 95% CI 0.99-6.89). The 7-day point prevalence of abstinence at 6-month follow-up in the two groups was the same (8%). Conclusions: This study has shown proof-of-concept evidence that 1-week free NRT sample could motivate NRT use and quit attempts in the adult smokers. Larger trials with more strategies for long-term NRT use and quitting outcomes are warranted.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong. -
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong International Nursing Forum-
dc.titleEffectiveness of Delivering Free Nicotine Replacement Therapy Sample at Outdoor Smoking Hotspots on Quit Attempts: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, YTD: takderek@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWang, MP: mpwang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLi, WHC: william3@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLam, TH: hrmrlth@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, YTD=rp02262-
dc.identifier.authorityWang, MP=rp01863-
dc.identifier.authorityLi, WHC=rp00528-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, TH=rp00326-
dc.identifier.hkuros284096-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats